Talk:-ine

the second usage, as identical to IUPAC's -yne, is seldom encountered, moreover the link used as a citation is dead, the info about this second usage is, sadly, not very useful - delete that crap!07:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)24.130.82.14 (talk)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?-ine
- In -ine on 2011-05-20 21:24:47, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
- In -ine on 2011-05-31 04:29:46, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amines...?

This suffix is also (perhaps even predominantly?) used for amines - most of the amino acids, for example, have names like glycine, leucine and so on, and are not usually considered alkaloids - 'The boundary between alkaloids and other nitrogen-containing natural compounds is not clear-cut. Compounds like amino acid peptides, proteins, nucleotides, nucleic acid, amines, and antibiotics are usually not called alkaloids.' --Oolong (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halogens?

It's kind of odd to see no mention of chlorine, fluorine, etc. My dictionary (mid- to late-twentieth century) gives that as the main use of this suffix, and certainly it's significant. I'd add something, but I'm not enough of a chemist to know what to say beyond the fact that all of the names end in "ine". (My last chemistry class was almost half a century ago.) If someone knowledgeable can either do the necessary work, or say why the halogens are missing, I'd appreciate it. Davecat4 (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]