Talk:(What Is) Love?/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 21:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• Two writers of the song are indicated here, but only one is credited in the lead section

• It does state two: "written by Diana "Wynter" Gordon, with the song's producer Emile "D'Mile" Dernst II." Statυs (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Lead

• Fix disambiguation issue with "Title track" according to this

•  Done Statυs (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

• ...(2011), as the album's title track. "(What Is) Love?" is a midtempo electropop song... → Put space betweeen "track" and "what"

• Not exactly sure what you mean here. Statυs (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Background

• No issues

Music and lyrics

• US Weekly noted the song's lyrics to be pointing "a few fingers" at Lopez's previous relationships... → The phrase "previous relationships" should not be wiki-linked, as it was a page that was twice deleted

•  Done Statυs (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Critical response

• No issues

Credits and personnel

• No issues

Charts

• No issues

Release history

• No issues

References

• Reference 6 → "Rap-Up" should not be wiki-linked as it was mentioned before

•  Done Statυs (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, I will be more than happy to help. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 22:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

• Thank you for the review! Statυs (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

All issues have been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 23:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)