Talk:(Drawing) Rings Around the World/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Promoted
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- I was very impressed with the musical structure section. Not being a musician myself I found it easy to understand. Of course, I don't know what F♯ sounds like but I understood the big picture. The only qualm I have is that your [[weatherman]] wikilink goes to a disambiguation page rather than an actual article. There's nothing in GA criteria that states you should fail for this but I highly recommend changing that. This would be brought up again if you put this article up for peer review or decided to nominate it for featured article.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The everyHit.com source did bother me because of the fact that I had to do a search to fact check your information and since it's a database it made me think of imdb which is generally not accepted as a reliable source in wikipedia. However, since I've never heard anything bad about everyHit.com then I have no reason to deny promotion.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I encourage you to review another article in the Arts category. For some reason the Arts section has a much longer wait list than the other sections. What I like to do is review the shorter articles because they're much easier to review and critique and it helps people. Also, the more I review other people's article the less time it will take for someone else to review mine. Congratulations. // Gbern3 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Gbern, have fixed the weatherman link. I occasionally do GA reviews but I've been busy at the minute. Cavie78 (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- I encourage you to review another article in the Arts category. For some reason the Arts section has a much longer wait list than the other sections. What I like to do is review the shorter articles because they're much easier to review and critique and it helps people. Also, the more I review other people's article the less time it will take for someone else to review mine. Congratulations. // Gbern3 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
