Talk:Laghava
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:॰)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 13 November 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus on where to move this to. Without having any sources in the article for this information, it's difficult to verify what this is actually called. (closed by page mover) Bradv 23:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
॰ → Lāghava Cihna – Punctuation is usually called by name: see Category:Punctuation. Викизавр (talk) 12:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- The second word shouldn’t be capitalized. Is this mark called “lāghava cihna” in English sources? Are there any English sources besides Unicode? Gorobay (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Devanagari brevity sign? Devanagari ellipsis sign? I don't know... Wikisaurus (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose need to see an actual source from a Hindi grammar before making any move. I have one in the attic but can't be bothered to go and dig it out since the current title is doing perfectly well. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. I would love to see some sort of move if possible. The present title must be almost impossible for readers to actually navigate to. Jenks24 (talk) 11:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.