Talk:Ștefania Mărăcineanu
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Article needs cleaning up.
[edit]The lead section is a stub. And the biography section is too long and cluttered we need to make separate sections for her work and early life and education. Rock-Bottom007 (talk) 03:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Rock-Bottom007
- I have split the Biography into three main subsections. I am BTW intrigued an American newspaper reporter described her as "a girl scientist" when she was then 45 years old!Cloptonson (talk) 05:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! I wanted to make the edit myself but decided against it because I was scared of ruining the article. Btw, the changes you made were the exact ones that I had in my mind as well. Rock-Bottom007 (talk) 10:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]There are many physicists. Not all are notable. If this woman is, please add her notable achievement(s) to the lede. 2.98.184.247 (talk) 13:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oh didnt see this. I saw the same problem as you - and I fixed it. Victuallers (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Forced retirement
[edit]The article statates that she was forced to retire but does not explain why. Was it due to age, bad health of political reasons in WW2? 90.235.125.46 (talk) 13:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Good idea! Can you (or anyone) find out? Victuallers (talk) 13:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- Mandatory retirement, due to age limits, as per the Romanian laws at the time. The quoted source says: "Pe 20 iunie 1942 o adresă sosită de la Ministerul Culturii Naţionale şi al Cultelor comunica Facultăţii de ştiinţe că, prin decizia ministerială nr. 120.790/1942 dra. dr. Ştefania Mărăcineanu, şefă de lucrări, urmează a fi pusă în retragere din oficiu, pentru a-şi regula drepturile la pensie, începînd cu 1 octombrie 1942, pentru limită de vârstă, în conformitate cu art. 89, alin. 1 din Legea relativă la organizarea învăţământului superior din 23 mai 1942, şi art. 35 din Codul funcţionarilor publici, decizie publicată şi în Monitorul Oficial." Turgidson (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class Women scientists articles
- Low-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- C-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- C-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- C-Class physics biographies articles
- Physics biographies articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 217 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report