Talk:Ūla

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is only 1 or 2 sentences in length. Please expand!
	Review comments: --Lysy^talk 13:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus Low‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

River flow

I tried hard to trace the source and the belarusian part of the river in maps, but the rivers/rivulets in this area (around 53°56'42.7"N 24°52'20.0"E) and around are so heavily channeled that I cannot tell heads from tails to verify the sources. The area is also part of the Lithuanian ethnographic region, so I had hard time to restore correct Belarusian names for toponyms mentioned in Lithuanian sources. It is hardly an important topic, I just enjoyed a bit of detective work. And it is not the first time I found that published sources are rather sloppy in details. and I am still not sure that 84km is the "true" length of the river, because numbers of its parts from various sources do not sum up. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]