Talk:Élisabeth Lévy
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Neo-reaction - failed verification
[edit]As far as I can tell from that source, it doesn't mention anything about neo-reactionism or 'the neo-reaction'; the only instance of 'neo' is the subject asking a question about neo-Catholicism, as far as I can tell. It is an interview by the article subject of one of the people named; formatting problems within the source even make it hard to tell which bits are the interviewer and which the interviewee. I'm sure the source might be useful for something, but at best using it to support this statement appears to be original research or improper synthesis. SamBC(talk) 12:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- I take note of the changes since I added the tags, but a link to one interview doesn't support the claim that she 'specialises' in such interviews; even a large number of such interviews as sources would make that original research. To make a claim like that, you need a reliable source that actually makes that claim. SamBC(talk) 12:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)