Talk:Ålgård Line/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: two disambiguations fixed.diff

Linkrot: no dead links found.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The prose is "reasonably well written", I made a small number of copy-edits.diff Complies sufficiently with the MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Online sources check out, I assume good faith for print sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Thorough, whilst remaining focussed on the subject.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Correctly tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I have no hesitation in passing this as a good article. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review the articles. Your feedback is continuing to make me an ever better Wikipedian. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]