Jump to content

Talk:À gogo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Dab-CU)

[edit]

I'm unsure about the intro, but have removed the cu tag as everything else now seems clean.
Boleyn (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   The prose portion at the top of the Dab sounds like it could have been written before we attained our current clarity about WP:PTOPIC and about the narrow applicability of prose in any Dab.
   And the diffs (use the "∆" option), between the original prose and what i am about to both move to an article and replace here, testify to year after year of timidity. (A fact that may also say something is that "Wikt:à gogo" began as the same prose, contributed with the same sig, in the same minute.) I think i can add encyclopedic content beyond that prose, for an article, so i'm going to break the prose out.
   The most natural way to construe the original and current content is a primary topic Dab where no one's bothered to split the prose out to start the primary-topic article. That is supported by the overwhelming prevalence of PTMs among the entries: three album titles, and maybe the record label can count as true matches, and it's hard to imagine those four adding up to the disco-related phrase itself in frequency of usage.
--Jerzyt 05:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
   A colleague opined in a wiki-source comment, "needs partial matches removed", as part of a series of edits that added a DabCU tag, and on that tag's line. The comment later became attached to a specific entry (which lk'd to another Dab page), but clearly referred solely to the general cleanup of this Dab page.
   The guidelines of course provide for exiling the partial matches to the "See also" section, and i have done so (also removing the wandering comment).
--Jerzyt 07:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored the dab page and move the unreferenced replacement to À gogo (phrase). This disambiguation page cover multiple topics and undoubtedly needs cleaning up but that is not what has occurred. Tassedethe (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Re WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. A more substantial article than the bare dictionary definition at À gogo (phrase) would be needed before the primary topic can be decided. Tassedethe (talk) 17:00, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]