Jump to content

Talk:? (Lost)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Duplicate of other article

[edit]

Seems odd that we haven't gotten around to merging these articles. --Ted 06:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See this and this, thank you. --muhaidib-- (Talk | #info | ) 16:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was the ? the Pearl?

[edit]

On the blast door map, six stations are shown circling the "?". However, if the Pearl is merely another Dharma station, then what is the "?"? Or was the Pearl the "?"? If so, then one of the stations circling it is not really a Dharma station at all. Can anyone verify anything about the "?" and the Pearl? ShadowUltra 00:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There where lots of buildings in the blue map, those buildings included labeled hatches/stations such as The Swan (6 o'clock), The Flame (8 o'clock), The Staff (10 o'clock), The Arrow (1 o'clock), two unlabeled stations (2 & 4 o'clock) which and one scribbled out (11 o'clock). There where other things in the map such as small squares which we don't know what they are yet, they are tagged as CV I, CV II, CV III, CV and CV IV (roman numerals). The question mark in the middle of the map is unknown by whoever drew that map which is obvious when we learn that it's The Pearl and it's an observation station which presumably no one knew about. So, in the side labels around the map the mapmaker somehow knew that there is something named "The Pearl" but didn't know where it is or what it's for, in the text around the map he/she thought that (CV IV) was The Pearl which is at 3 o'clock of the map. --muhaidib-- (Talk | #info | ) 02:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Locke's Dream, not Eko's

[edit]

The dream was Locke's, not Eko's, even though Eko was the "actor" in the dream. In other words, it was a dream Locke was having about Eko. (Perhaps Locke WAS Eko in the dream. Who knows). When Eko reached the top of the cliff, Yemi said "wake up, John." He did NOT say "wake up Eko." This is significant, and erroneously described in this article. Anyway, I find it interesting that even tho Locke saw in the dream what would have certainly been Eko's death, he let Eko climb the cliff anyway without warning him. Recall that Locke had also seen a vision of Boone dead, and let him climb into the airplane anyway, with fatal results. I think Locke was willing to risk Eko's life to gain key infomration, perhaps viewing him as another "sacrifice the island demanded." I don't think Locke places a very high value on human life, really. He gives me the creeps sometimes. --C.67.170.176.203 06:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There where dreams of both Locke and Eko, but the flashbacks where Eko's. --muhaidib-- (Talk | #info | ) 14:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plagarism

[edit]

A section of this page was copied directly from Lostpedia. The following text was copied:

During the Lockdown incident, while being trapped under one of the blast doors, Locke saw the blast door map for the first time. He later tried to recreate the map on paper by drawing what he remembered. Locke only had a few seconds to look at the blast door map though, so his memories of the details were rather patchy. He appeared to recall the station locations, the 'rivers' and the "?" in the middle the best. After various attempts, particularly in "S.O.S."., Locke finally drew a good copy, which was seen in "?", when he was handing it to Mr. Eko

The text was added to Lostpedia on November 20th, 2006 and added to wikipedia on January 19th, 2007. The history can be viewed here at Lostpedia and here at wikipedia. Could someone please change this article to avoid the plagiarism.-Mr.Leaf67 00:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lost-?.jpg

[edit]

Image:Lost-?.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lost S02E21 Report.jpg

[edit]

Image:Lost S02E21 Report.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ? (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ? (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:%3F_(Lost)&oldid=1196237174"