Talk:"U" Is for Undertow

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Novels: Crime Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Crime task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on "U" Is for Undertow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100103134610/http://www.pbpulse.com/arts-and-culture/book-reviews-arts/2009/12/13/u-is-for-undertow-tops-bestseller-list/ to http://www.pbpulse.com/arts-and-culture/book-reviews-arts/2009/12/13/u-is-for-undertow-tops-bestseller-list/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Archived link goes to the page showing this novel at top of best seller list. --Prairieplant (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the links will be basis for Reviews section

As this article has some valid urls in the references now used so oddly (up in the lead, after the title and author and number in the series, facts needing no inline reference), have serious reviews that would add to the Reviews section, yet unwritten. More reviews are likely available on line. Some of the existing refs are interviews with the author, which are fine to read but I am not sure how they are best used in an article about the novel. More useful in an article about the author, or the series in some instances. --Prairieplant (talk) 19:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]