Jump to content

T A Dellaca v PDL Industries Ltd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

T A Dellaca Ltd v PDL Industries Ltd
CourtHigh Court of New Zealand
Full case name T A Dellaca Ltd v PDL Industries Ltd
Decided20 November 1991
Citation[1992] 3 NZLR 88
Court membership
Judge sittingTipping J

T A Dellaca Ltd v PDL Industries Ltd [1992] 3 NZLR 88 is a cited case in New Zealand law regarding the requirement of some form of signature on a document required under the Contracts Enforcement Act 1956.[1][page needed]

References

[edit]
  • R D Mulholland, "Part performance: Back to classical theory" in "Law of contract" [1993] NZLJ 109. See further pages 291 and 361.
  • The Abridgement of New Zealand Case Law. Permanent Supplement (No 5) to Volumes 1 to 18. Butterworths. Wellington. 1995. Pages 217 and 1244. Google
  • New Zealand Recent Law Review 1994. Page 35.
  • [1994] NZLJ 396 and 397
  • [1997] NZLJ 104
  • (2000) New Zealand Law Journal 196 and 197
  • Butterworths Current Law Digest. 2004. Page 116. Google
  • Butterworths Current Law. 1992. Paragraphs 202 and 264. Google
  • Butterworths Current Law. 1993. Pages 250 and 257. Google
  • (1998) 13 Journal of Contract Law 111
  • Stephen Todd and Jeremy Finn. Contract Law in New Zealand. Fourth Edition. Wolters Kluwer. 2019. Note 412.
  • David Wright. Remedies. Federation Press. 2010. Page 174. Google
  • I C F Spry. The Principles of Equitable Remedies. Fifth Edition. LBC Information Services. 1997. Page 267.
  • Stephen Mason. Electronic Signatures in Law. Third Edition. Cambridge University Press. 2012. Pages 51 and 64.
  1. ^ Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. ISBN 0-86472-555-8.