Soestdijk-class gunvessel
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
.jpg) Gunvessel Schouwen of the Soestdijk class
| |
| Class overview | |
|---|---|
| Name | Soestdijk class |
| Builders | multiple |
| Operators |  Royal Netherlands Navy |
| Preceded by | Haarlemmermeer class |
| Succeeded by | Riouw class |
| Planned | 8 |
| Completed | 8 |
| Scrapped | 8 |
| General characteristics | |
| Type | Gunvessel |
| Tonnage | 285[1] |
| Displacement | 586 tons[2] |
| Length | 38 m (124 ft 8 in)[2] |
| Beam | 8.16 m (26 ft 9 in)[3] |
| Draught | 3.20 m (10 ft 6 in)[3] |
| Installed power | |
| Speed | 6-7 kn |
| Complement | 75[1] |
| Armament |
|
The Soestdijk class was a class of 8 gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class was built to the same design as the preceding Haarlemmermeer class, but proved far more durable.
Context
[edit]In the late 1850s the Dutch navy seemed to have a found a suitable model for gunvessels that could be used in the Netherlands as well as in the Dutch East Indies and West Indies. This was the Haarlemmermeer class, which seemed very promising while it was still on the slipway. Without waiting for proof of the abilities of the Haarlemmermeer the Dutch navy ordered a second batch of these vessels, the Soestdijk class.
The Haarlemmermeer class had been ordered from commercial shipyards. Construction by state shipyards or commercial shipyards was a point of political controversy fueled by ideology. Indeed Johannes Servaas Lotsy was minister of the navy when all these ships were ordered. The difference was that Jan Jacob Rochussen was prime minister from 18 March 1858 to 23 February 1860. From 23 February 1860 to 14 March 1861 it was Floris Adriaan van Hall.
Anyway, a second series of ships according to the Haarlemmermeer design was started. In 1860 the navy decided to build 5 more ships to the same design on state owned shipyards. Three at the Rijskwerf Amsterdam, and two on the Rijskwerf Vlissingen. The reasons given for this apparent change of policy was that the government saw an advantage in lengthening the construction time of ships on the slipway, and that this way the national shipyards could use their supply of wood only suitable for small ships.[4] Even before the lead ship of the Haarlemmermeer class had been commissioned, the Soestdijk and Coehoorn were laid down at the (state owned) Rijkswerf Amsterdam.
Characteristics
[edit]General
[edit]The ships of the Soestdijk were built according to the same design as the Haarlemmermeer class. Tideman[5] gives the length of 38 m in his overview of active ships. That is for the Kijkduin, Aart van Nes, Schouwen and Bommelerwaard. On the other hand the already decommissioned Brielle and Maas en Waal were in the overview of already decommissioned ships, and got a length of 40.7 m.[3] The beam and draught are equal in both overviews.
The explanation for the difference is that in the overview of active ships Tideman gave the length between perpendiculars. In the overview of retired ships the length was measured including the rudderpost.[3]
Propulsion
[edit]Propulsion of the class was the same as that of the Haarlemmermeer class.
Armament
[edit]Armament of the class was the same as that of the Haarlemmermeer class.
Criticism
[edit]The class was built to the same design as the Haarlemmermeer class, which got much criticism in the 1862 investigation of the navy by the Dutch House of Representatives. By the time that the first ships of the Soestdijk class were commissioned, this inquiry had long been finished.
Contrary to the short-lived Haarlemmermeer class, the ships of the Soestdijk class had a lifespan comparable to other screw steamship classes.
Ships in the class
[edit]Notes on individual ships
[edit]The Aart van Nes was decommissioned in 1879 in Surabaya[6] and converted to a ship for pilots on the eastern approaches of the city. While there she was sunk in early 1881 when S.S. Drenthe hit her.[7]
Construction
[edit]| Name | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Fate | Built by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soestdijk | 12 April 1860[8] | 19 March 1862[9] | 1 February 1864[10] | Sold 29 November 1875[11] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
| Coehoorn | 1 August 1860[12] | 19 March 1862[9] | 11 August 1864[13] | Unfit 20 April 1874[14] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
| Bommelerwaard | 19 February 1861[8] | 29 October 1862[15] | 1 May 1865[16] | Sold 4 May 1878[17] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
| Maas en Waal | 19 February 1861[12] | 25 September 1862[18] | 1 September 1865[19] | Sold 19 September 1874[20] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
| Den Briel | 18 March 1861[12] | 18 May 1863[21] | 1 September 1865[22] | Sold 26 September 1874[20] | Rijkswerf Vlissingen |
| Aart van Nes | 6 April 1861[12] | 2 June 1863[23] | 1 September 1865[24] | Sunk 1881[7] | Rijkswerf Vlissingen |
| Kijduin | 12 April 1861[8] | 2 December 1863[25] | 1 February 1867[26] | Sold 16 November 1876[27] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
| Schouwen | 12 April 1861[8] | 23 December 1863[28] | 1 February 1867[26] | Sold 23 December 1878[29] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b c d Tweede Kamer 1875, Bijlage A: Algemeen overzicht der schepen en vaartuigen van oorlog op den 1sten Augustus 1875.
- ^ a b Tideman 1880, p. 2e afd p. 14.
- ^ a b c d e Tideman 1880, p. 2e afd p. 7.
- ^ "Uittreksel uit de Memorie van Toelichting". Algemeen Handelsblad. 1 October 1860.
- ^ Tideman 1880, p. 2e afd p. 12.
- ^ "Uit het Bassin". Soerabaijasch handelsblad. 23 September 1879.
- ^ a b "Nederlandsch-Indië". Java-bode. 5 May 1881.
- ^ a b c d Departement van Marine 1869, p. 110.
- ^ a b "Binnenlandsche Berigten". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 20 March 1862.
- ^ "Marine en Leger". Rotterdamsche courant. 3 February 1864.
- ^ "Marine". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 17 November 1875.
- ^ a b c d Departement van Marine 1869, p. 116.
- ^ "Marine en Leger". Rotterdamsche courant. 13 August 1864.
- ^ "Nederlandsche Kolonien". Algemeen Handelsblad. 31 May 1874.
- ^ "Binnenlandsche Berichten". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 30 October 1862.
- ^ "Marine en Leger". Rotterdamsche courant. 4 May 1865.
- ^ "Nederlandsche Kolonien". Algemeen Handelsblad. 20 June 1878.
- ^ "Binnenlandsche Berichten". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 26 September 1862.
- ^ "Utrecht, Zaturdag 2 September". Utrechtsch provinciaal. 2 September 1865.
- ^ a b "Uit Soerabaia". De Locomotief. 29 August 1874.
- ^ "Binnenlandsche Berichten". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 19 May 1863.
- ^ "Marine en Leger". Middelburgsche courant. 15 August 1865.
- ^ "Binnenlandsche Berichten". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 3 June 1863.
- ^ "Marine en Leger". Rotterdamsche courant. 12 August 1865.
- ^ "Binnenlandsche Berichten". Nederlandsche staatscourant. 3 December 1863.
- ^ a b "Helvoetsluis, 8 Jan". Dagblad van Zuidholland. 11 January 1867.
- ^ "Kroniek van de Week". De West-Indiër. 12 November 1876.
- ^ "Marine en Leger". Rotterdamsche courant. 24 December 1863.
- ^ "Op de vendutie". Bataviaasch handelsblad. 13 December 1878.
References
[edit]- Tideman, B.J. (1880), Memoriaal van de Marine, Van Heteren Amsterdam
- Departement van Marine (1869), Koninklijke Nederlandsche Marine op den 1sten Januarij 1869, Gebroeders van Cleef, p. 103
- Tweede Kamer (1875), Bijlagen van het verslag der Handelingen, Nederlandsche Staatscourant
- Murray, Andrew (1863), Ship-building in Iron and Wood, Adam and Charles Black, Edinburgh, hdl:2027/mdp.39015004516913