Simanke v Liu
| Simanke v Liu | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | High Court of New Zealand |
| Full case name | Simanke v Liu |
| Citation | (1994) 2 NZ ConvC 191,888 |
| Court membership | |
| Judge sitting | Henry J |
Simanke v Liu (1994) 2 NZ ConvC 191,888 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding cancellation of a contract under the Contractual Remedies Act. It held that any deposit in excess of a customary deposit, in this case 10%, is refundable to the purchaser.[1]
Background
[edit]Simanke agreed to sell a property to Liu for $650,000, with the sales agreement stating that a deposit of $300,000 was to be paid within 14 days.
The contract was later cancelled, and Siminake sued for the $300,000 deposit. Liu defended the claim by saying as under the Contractual Remedies Act 1979, once a contract is cancelled, no party is obliged to perform any further on a contract. Simanke argued that the Act still requires the deposit to be paid.
Held
[edit]The court ruled that in New Zealand, the customary deposit is 10%, meaning in this case, $300,000 was not in the nature of a deposit, and so was not enforceable here. Furthermore, Simanke's claim was not helped either by the fact that the sales agreement had limited the forfeiture of deposit to be only 10%, anyway. Simanke's claim was dismissed.
References
[edit]- ^ Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. 362. ISBN 0-86472-555-8.
 | This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |