Jump to content

Ifeoma Ozoma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Silenced No More Act)

Ifeoma Ozoma
Born1991 or 1992 (age 31–32)
Alma materYale University
Occupation(s)Public policy and tech equity consultant
Known forWorkers' rights advocacy in the technology industry

Ifeoma Ozoma (born 1991 or 1992) is an American public policy specialist and technology industry equity advocate. After two years working on public policy at Pinterest, Ozoma resigned and spoke out about mistreatment and racial discrimination she alleged she had experienced at the company. She subsequently began a consulting firm called Earthseed, and has worked to advocate for whistleblower protection legislation and other worker protections in the technology industry. She is the director of tech accountability at the University of California, LA Center on Race and Digital Justice.[1]

She has been recognized by The Root and Time for her work.

Early life and education

[edit]

Ozoma grew up in Anchorage, Alaska, and Raleigh, North Carolina.[2][3] Her parents are Nigerian immigrants.[2][3] Ozoma attended high school at Choate Rosemary Hall, a private college-preparatory boarding school in Connecticut.[4][3] She earned a Bachelor of Arts in political science from Yale University in 2015.[4][5]

Career and advocacy

[edit]

After graduating college, Ozoma joined Google at the Washington, D.C., office in 2015, where she worked on public policy and was a government liaison.[2][4] She then spent two years at Facebook in Silicon Valley, working on international relations.[2][3]

Pinterest

[edit]

Ozoma joined Pinterest's newly-formed public policy and impact team in 2018.[3][5][2] While she was at Pinterest, she orchestrated its widely-praised decision to stop promoting former slave plantations as wedding venues.[3][6] She also worked on subjects including medical misinformation, and helped Pinterest implement a policy to ban anti-vaccination content from its platform.[2][7]

While at Pinterest, she spent a year advocating for a pay raise, which she said would have brought her compensation in line with that of colleagues with similar experience and responsibilities.[5] She ultimately hired a lawyer to assist her with negotiations about her title and compensation.[3] After Ozoma suggested that the company add a content warning to posts by Ben Shapiro, a conservative political commentator whom she described as a "white supremacist",[8] a colleague collaborated with a right-wing group to dox Ozoma by publishing her personal phone number, name, and photographs on extremist websites.[3][5] Ozoma began to receive death threats.[9] Pinterest did not help Ozoma get the information removed, nor punished the employee who was responsible.[9]

Already frustrated with what she described as a "dangerously inadequate" response to the doxing incident, and with fruitlessly advocating for a raise, a manager's criticism in a performance review of the language she had used in the wedding venue policy was the last straw for her.[5] In May 2020, Ozoma resigned from her position and filed a complaint with California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH).[9][10] She eventually reached a settlement with Pinterest.[3]

Ozoma began publicly discussing her experiences in June, breaking a non-disclosure agreement,[11] after Pinterest declared what she believed to be empty support of Black lives in the wake of the George Floyd protests and Black Lives Matter advocacy around the country.[9] Along with colleague Aerica Shimizu Banks, who also resigned and filed a complaint with DFEH, she publicly stated she had been paid unfairly at Pinterest, and faced retaliation when calling for change.[12] Both women criticized the environment as hostile and discriminatory toward Black women.[8] In August, Pinterest employees staged a walkout to protest the company's mistreatment of women, particularly women of color.[13]

Ozoma and Banks each received less than a year of severance pay when they quit.[10] A few months later, Françoise Brougher, Pinterest's former chief operating officer, was awarded a $22.5 million settlement in a gender discrimination lawsuit against the company.[14][12] Others in the tech industry, including Timnit Gebru, criticized Pinterest for what they saw as racist disparity in how the company treated Ozoma and Banks, and how they treated Brougher, who is white. According to The Guardian, Ozoma and Banks had "laid the groundwork" for others at the company, including Brougher, to speak out about discrimination.[12] Ozoma described the settlement as a "slap in the face".[12]

In November 2021, Pinterest settled a shareholder lawsuit filed by the Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island that alleged executives enabled a toxic culture of discrimination. The lawsuit was based on the allegations made by Ozoma and Banks.[15] The settlement earmarked $50 million into diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts at the company.[8]

After resigning from Pinterest, Ozoma founded Earthseed, a consulting firm focused on equity in the tech industry.[2]

Silenced No More Act

[edit]

Ozoma co-sponsored[a] California's Silenced No More Act, legislation that protects employees who speak about harassment and discrimination even if they've signed a non-disclosure agreement.[11][17] The bill was authored by Ozoma and Senator Connie Leyva,[3][18] and was passed by the California State Assembly. It was signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in October 2021, and went into effect on January 1, 2022.[17]

In fall 2021, Ozoma inspired Chelsey Glasson,[19] a former Google employee who sued for pregnancy discrimination, and worked with Cher Scarlett,[20] a former Apple software engineer and labor activist who had been a leader of the #AppleToo movement, to bring a similar bill to Washington state, which was passed into law in March 2022.[21] Google and Apple committed to Silenced No More protections for all employees.[22][23]

Apple shareholder proposal

[edit]

In September 2021, Ozoma, non-profit shareholder advocacy group Open MIC,[24] and social impact investing firms Whistle Capital and Nia Impact Capital[25] filed a shareholder proposal at Apple.[2] The group asked the company to perform a risk assessment with respect to non-disclosure clauses imposed on employees who have experienced harassment or discrimination.[2] The proposal came following a less formal suggestion from Ozoma and Nia, to proactively add a statement to employment agreements saying that employees were not prevented from "discussing or disclosing information about unlawful acts in the workplace, such as harassment or discrimination". Apple refused, saying this was already reflected in its Business Conduct Policy.[26]

On October 18, 2021, Apple filed a no-action response to the shareholder proposal with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),[27] claiming that Apple does not utilize the types of concealment clauses that Nia was referencing.[28]

On November 22, 2021, Nia filed a response to Apple and the SEC, stating that they had "received information, confidentially provided, that Apple has sought to use concealment clauses in the context of discrimination, harassment, and other workplace labor violation claims". Scarlett later revealed she had provided Nia with the information.[28] On December 21, 2021, the SEC ruled against Apple's filing, a win for the activists.[29] Eight United States treasurers called on the SEC to investigate. Shareholders voted in favor of the proposal of the audit on March 4, 2022. Apple published the results of the audit in December 2022 and committed to non-enforcement of provisions found that might limit "a person’s ability to speak about [unlawful] conduct".[23][30]

The Tech Worker Handbook

[edit]

In collaboration with organizations such as Omidyar Network, The Signals Network, and Lioness, Ozoma launched The Tech Worker Handbook in October 2021. It is a website containing free resources for tech workers who are looking to make more informed decisions about whether to speak out on issues that are in the public interest.[3][31][32] The handbook guides workers through what they might encounter in the legal process, how to approach the media, and information on how to navigate physical and security concerns. This includes anecdotes and recommendations from other tech whistleblowers.[33]

Recognition

[edit]

Ozoma was included in The Root's 2021 "The Root 100",[34] an annual list of the most influential African Americans in various fields.[35]

Ozoma was recognized by Time in 2022 in the Time 100 Next list[36] and was honored as one of the BBC 100 Women in the same year.[37]

Personal life

[edit]

Ozoma resides in Santa Fe, New Mexico.[3]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Although sponsors of proposed legislation normally are legislators, in California, outside parties lobbying for legislation are referred to as "sponsors".[16]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Karimi, Faith (December 6, 2022). "This former tech worker is helping change laws for people who get laid off | CNN Business". CNN. Retrieved December 28, 2022.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Woo, Erin (November 24, 2021). "A Tech Whistle-Blower Helps Others Speak Out". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 24, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2021.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Rogers, Taylor Nicole (October 15, 2021). "The Pinterest whistleblower leading the charge against NDAs". Financial Times. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  4. ^ a b c "Classnotes". Choate Rosemary Hall Bulletin. May 19, 2015. p. 50. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  5. ^ a b c d e Bort, Julie (June 15, 2020). "Two Black women publicly resigned from Pinterest saying they faced humiliation, retaliation and were passed over for promotion". Business Insider. Archived from the original on December 15, 2020. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  6. ^ Murphy, Heather (December 5, 2019). "Pinterest and The Knot Pledge to Stop Promoting Plantation Weddings". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  7. ^ Wilson, Mark (February 26, 2019). "The tech giant fighting anti-vaxxers isn't Twitter or Facebook. It's Pinterest". Fast Company. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2021.
  8. ^ a b c Schiffer, Zoe (November 24, 2021). "Pinterest settles shareholder lawsuit over workplace culture". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 25, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  9. ^ a b c d Kai, Maiysha (August 13, 2021). "'There Is Literally No Way to Catch Up': Black Women Speak Candidly on the Cost of Racism, Sexism and Pay Inequity at Pinterest". The Root. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  10. ^ a b Duffy, Kate (December 16, 2020). "Pinterest's $22.5 million gender discrimination settlement is another example of how Black women are ignored, say senior women of color in the tech industry". Business Insider. Archived from the original on December 17, 2020. Retrieved December 17, 2020.
  11. ^ a b Spencer, Christian (May 10, 2021). "Woman who bravely spoke out against tech firm sponsors bill to help others do it too". The Hill. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2021.
  12. ^ a b c d Paul, Kari (December 18, 2020). "Pinterest's $22m settlement with executive is a 'slap in the face', Black former workers say". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 18, 2020. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  13. ^ Gold, Ashley (August 16, 2020). "Pinterest employees stage walkout, new board member delayed". Axios. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  14. ^ Dickey, Megan Rose (December 15, 2020). "Pinterest's $22.5M settlement highlights tech's inequities, say former employees who alleged discrimination". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on February 24, 2022. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  15. ^ Schiffer, Zoe (December 1, 2020). "Pinterest shareholders sue over 'toxic' work culture". The Verge. Archived from the original on November 25, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  16. ^ de Sá, Karen (July 6, 2010). "How our laws in California are really made". The Mercury News. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved November 27, 2021.
  17. ^ a b Schiffer, Zoe (October 7, 2021). "California just made it a lot harder for companies to cover up harassment and abuse". The Verge. Archived from the original on October 8, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2021.
  18. ^ Villegas, Paulina (February 8, 2021). "NDAs have long been used to silence the abused, advocates say. A new law may change that". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on March 28, 2021. Retrieved November 28, 2021.
  19. ^ House Labor & Workplace Standards Committee (January 18, 2022). "Public Hearing: HB 1795" (Video). TVW. Archived from the original on January 20, 2022. Retrieved January 26, 2022.
  20. ^ Woo, Erin (November 24, 2021). "A Tech Whistle-Blower Helps Others Speak Out". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 24, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2021.
  21. ^ Lapowsky, Issie (March 4, 2022). "Washington became the second state to pass the Silenced No More Act". Protocol. Archived from the original on March 4, 2022. Retrieved March 4, 2022.
  22. ^ "Google quietly gave Silenced No More protections to all". April 11, 2022. Archived from the original on April 11, 2022. Retrieved April 12, 2022.
  23. ^ a b "Apple to end employee gagging clauses after activist campaign". Financial Times. December 9, 2022. Retrieved December 28, 2022.
  24. ^ Bass, Dina (October 13, 2021). "Microsoft Agrees to Human Rights Review in Deals With Law Enforcement, Government". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved November 27, 2021.
  25. ^ Fox, Jr., Kevin (November 23, 2021). "Apple Reportedly Lied in Recent Memo about NDAs and Silencing Employees". Paste. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  26. ^ Schiffer, Zoe (September 8, 2021). "Apple refuses to make NDA concessions for workplace harassment and discrimination". The Verge. Archived from the original on November 24, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2021.
  27. ^ McGee, Patrick; Temple-West, Patrick (October 27, 2021). "Apple fights shareholder call for more transparency on forced labour". Financial Times. Archived from the original on November 24, 2021. Retrieved November 24, 2021.
  28. ^ a b Drange, Matt (November 23, 2021). "Apple told the SEC it doesn't silence employees regarding workplace harassment or discrimination. New whistleblower documents show that isn't true". Business Insider. Archived from the original on November 23, 2021. Retrieved November 23, 2021.
  29. ^ Sumagaysay, Levi. "SEC rejects Apple's argument that it doesn't try to silence workers after former employee disputed it". MarketWatch. Archived from the original on December 24, 2021. Retrieved December 23, 2021.
  30. ^ Lawler, Richard (March 4, 2022). "Apple shareholders approve a civil rights audit and investigation of the risks of its NDAs". The Verge. Retrieved March 5, 2022.
  31. ^ Sun, Mengqi (October 28, 2021). "More Tech Whistleblowers Are Expected, Experts Say". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  32. ^ Elias, Jennifer (October 10, 2021). "Tech whistleblowers are having a moment, and one woman who's been there has found a new way to help". CNBC. Archived from the original on January 2, 2022. Retrieved November 9, 2021.
  33. ^ Lee, Dave (October 19, 2021). "Rise of Silicon Valley whistleblowers spawns new industry". Financial Times. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  34. ^ "Ifeoma Ozoma - The Root 100 - 2021". The Root. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  35. ^ "The Root 100: Tell Us Who Should Be on Our Annual List of Influential African Americans". The Root. May 1, 2018. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved November 27, 2021.
  36. ^ "2022 TIME100 Next: Ifeoma Ozoma". Time. Retrieved October 7, 2022.
  37. ^ "BBC 100 Women 2022: Who is on the list this year?". BBC News. Retrieved December 10, 2022.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ifeoma_Ozoma&oldid=1243437095#Silenced_No_More_Act"