Jump to content

San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.
Decided May 27, 2021
Full case nameSan Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.
Docket no.20-334
Citations593 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39 does not permit a district court to alter a court of appeals’ allocation of the costs listed in subdivision (e) of that rule.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinion
MajorityAlito, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. App. P. 39

San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39 does not permit a district court to alter a court of appeals’ allocation of the costs listed in subsection (e) of that rule.[1] Rule 39 is about awarding the costs of the appeal to the victor, and subsection (e) is about the taxation of such an award.[2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., No. 20-334, 593 U.S. ___ (2021)
  2. ^ "Unanimous court rejects district court discretion to reduce appellate cost awards". SCOTUSblog. 2021-05-28. Retrieved 2024-10-24.
[edit]
  • Text of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., No. 20-334, 593 U.S. ___ (2021) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)