Jump to content

Road ecology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Road ecology is the study of the ecological effects (both positive and negative) of roads and highways (public roads). These effects may include local effects, such as on noise, water pollution, habitat destruction/disturbance and local air quality; and the wider environmental effects of transport such as habitat fragmentation, ecosystem degradation, and climate change from vehicle emissions.

The design, construction and management of roads, parking and other related facilities as well as the design and regulation of vehicles can change their effect. Roads are known to cause significant damage to forests, prairies, streams and wetlands.[1] Besides the direct habitat loss due to the road itself, and the roadkill of animal species, roads alter water-flow patterns, increase noise, water, and air pollution, create disturbance that alters the species composition of nearby vegetation thereby reducing habitat for local native animals, and act as barriers to animal movements. Roads are a form of linear infrastructure intrusion that has some effects similar to infrastructure such as railroads, power lines, and canals, particularly in tropical forests.[2]

Road ecology is practiced as a field of inquiry by a variety of ecologists, biologists, hydrologists, engineers, and other scientists. There are several global centers for the study of road ecology: 1) The Road Ecology Center [3] at the University of California, Davis, which was the first of its kind in the world; 2) the Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Ecologia de Estradas at the Federal University of Lavras, Brazil;[4] 3) The Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State University;[5] and 4) the Road Ecology Program at the Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University.[6] There are also several important global conferences for road ecology research: 1) Infra-Eco Network Europe (IENE),[7] which is international, but focused primarily on Europe; 2) International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET),[8] which is also global in scope, but primarily focused on the US; 3) Australasian Network for Ecology & Transportation (ANET),[9] which focuses on the Australasian (sub)continent; and 4) a potential Southern African road ecology conference, being considered by the Endangered Wildlife Trust.[10]

Air quality

[edit]
Air pollution along Pasadena Highway in Los Angeles, United States

Roads can have both negative and positive effects on air quality.

Air pollution from fossil (and some biofuel) powered vehicles can occur wherever vehicles are used and are of particular concern in congested city street conditions and other low speed circumstances. Emissions, also referred to as exhaust gas, include particulate emissions from diesel engines, NOx,[11] volatile organic compounds,[12] carbon monoxide[13] and various other hazardous air pollutants including benzene.[14] Concentrations of air pollutants and adverse respiratory health effects are greater near the road than at some distance away from the road.[15] Road dust kicked up by vehicles may trigger allergic reactions.[16] Carbon dioxide is non-toxic to humans but is a major greenhouse gas and motor vehicle emissions are an important contributor to the growth of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere and therefore to global warming.

The construction of new roads which divert traffic from populated areas can deliver a perceived improvement in air quality in the original area. However, new roads will typically lead to more overall emissions due to induced demand.[17] The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study carried out for the development of the Tirana Outer Ring Road estimated that it would result in improved air quality in Tirana city center.[18]

A new section of road being built near Hindhead, UK, to replace a four-mile section of the A3 road, and which includes the new Hindhead Tunnel, is expected by the government to deliver environmental benefits to the immediate area including the removal of daily congestion, the elimination of air pollution in Hindhead caused by the congestion, and the removal of an existing road which crosses the environmentally sensitive Devil's Punchbowl area.[19][needs update]

Hydrology

[edit]
See also: Stormwater

Urban runoff from roads and other impervious surfaces is a major source of water pollution.[20] Rainwater and snowmelt running off of roads tends to pick up gasoline, motor oil, heavy metals, trash and other pollutants. Road runoff is a major source of nickel, copper, zinc, cadmium, lead and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are created as combustion byproducts of gasoline and other fossil fuels.[21]

De-icing chemicals and sand can run off into roadsides, contaminate groundwater and pollute surface waters.[22] Road salts (primarily chlorides of sodium, calcium or magnesium) can be toxic to sensitive plants and animals.[23] Sand can alter stream bed environments, causing stress for the plants and animals that live there. Several studies have found a definite difference in physical properties of waters between catchments or hydric systems immediately adjacent to roads compared with those in environments further away from the studied roads.[24] De-icing chemicals, salt, chlorides and the nutrients brought by particulate pollution such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can trigger trophic cascades in adjacent waterways.[25][26]

De-icing chemicals

[edit]

The chemicals applied to roads along with grit for de-icing are primarily Salt and calcium chloride.[27] Other chemicals such as urea are also used.[27] These chemicals leave the road surface either in water runoff or in water spray. Apart from heavy metal bioaccumulation[28] in adjacent plants, vegetation can be damaged by salt as far as 100 m (110 yd) from the road.[29] Studies have found negative effects on wood frog population dynamics when tadpoles were raised in presence of most de-icing chemicals, such as decreased tadpole survival rates and modified sex ratios at maturity.[30][31]

An increased level of chloride in water due to salt application to roads can be widespread in waterways, rather than a local phenomenon of the road edge itself.[27]

Noise

[edit]
Conversation with other traffic users is possible with low traffic noise

Motor vehicle traffic on roads will generate noise, in a wide range of frequencies which can affect both humans and animals.

Negative effects

[edit]

Noise pollution is a factor of environmental degradation that is often overlooked and typically seen as not having a significant effect, though traffic noise can contribute to numerous disturbances for wildlife. An increasing number of studies have been done on the effects of noise on wildlife. Both the sounds made by motors and the wind over moving vehicle structures, and the ultrasonic vibrations transmitted through the air and ground from vehicle passage can overlap with the frequency ranges and amplitudes used by animals for communication.[32][33][34]

Several studies revealed that noise can have a negative effect, particularly on birds. Noise from major roads can interrupt or interfere with the calls of song birds, and their instinctive calls associated with mating, communication, migration, and other purposes are hindered by noise from roads. Birds in cities that are exposed to traffic noise sing higher-frequency songs which increases the amplitude of their songs so that they are more likely to be heard over the noise.[35] One study did not necessarily directly provide a fatal effect for the tested birds, but the study showed that species abundance declined around major roads due to noise.[36] Noise effects may also modify the behaviour of certain species, such as birds and their feeding behaviours. Birds may spend an increasing amount of time using visual scanning to spot predators as a result of auditory cues and alarm signals from other species being masked by noise pollution. A decreased amount of time spent feeding may lower the mean body weight of birds living near roads, which directly affects their survival rates in a negative fashion.[37] Chronic traffic noise exposure hinders a bird's ability to respond to other common stress cues by lowering levels of stress-induced corticosterone (a measure of how strongly an organism responds to a stressor).[38] This can be life-threatening if birds are not able to respond appropriately to a stress cue, such as a predator. In noisy environments, nestlings are less likely to beg when their parents arrive because traffic noise masks the sounds of their parents' arrival.[39] This effect can lower rates of feeding, which leads to a reduction in nestling body size and chance of post-fledgling survival. Nestlings exposed to noise may also suffer from reduced immune function.[40]

Road noise can be a nuisance if it impinges on population centres, especially for roads at higher operating speeds, near intersections and on uphill sections. Noise health effects can be expected in such locations from road systems used by large numbers of motor vehicles. Noise mitigation strategies exist to reduce sound levels at nearby sensitive receptors. The idea that road design could be influenced by acoustical engineering considerations first arose about 1973.[citation needed]

Speed bumps, which are usually deployed in built-up areas, can increase noise pollution. This is especially the case if large vehicles use the road and particularly at night.

Positive effects

[edit]

New roads can divert traffic away from population centres thus relieving the noise pollution. A new road scheme planned in Shropshire, UK promises to reduce traffic noise in Shrewsbury town centre.[41][needs update]

Effects on wildlife

[edit]

Habitat fragmentation

[edit]
Main article: Barrier effect
Indian giant squirrel, a tree dweller, killed on a road that has disrupted the rainforest canopy

Roads can act as barriers or filters to animal movement and lead to habitat fragmentation.[42] Many species will not cross the open space created by a road due to the threat of predation[43] and roads also cause increased animal mortality from traffic.[44] This barrier effect can prevent species from migrating and recolonising areas where the species has gone locally extinct as well as restricting access to seasonally available or widely scattered resources.[43]

Habitat fragmentation may also divide large continuous populations into smaller more isolated populations.[42] These smaller populations are more vulnerable to genetic drift, inbreeding depression and an increased risk of population decline and extinction.[43] Whether or not this effect is observed depends greatly on the size and mobility of the species in question and the spatial scale at which the fragmentation occurs.[45] Fragmentation does not affect all species in the same way.

The presence of roads also decreases the amount of habitat accessible to species. This is to say that it decreases the amount of usable habitat available to organisms without crossing a road. That being said, whether a habitat on the other side of the road becomes inaccessible to an organism or not varies between species. Roads are a permeable barrier to some organisms and impermeable to others.[46]

Amphibians and reptiles

[edit]
Snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) crossing a road

Roads can be particularly hazardous to populations of amphibians and reptiles that migrate to vernal pools,[47] or to the gravel on road verges that several species try to use as nest sites.[48] Reptiles' instinctive activities can lead them towards roads and lead to an increase in mortality rates: snakes, for example, may use roads as a source of heat for thermoregulation. Also some turtles have been noted to lay their eggs on road shoulders. Migratory patterns from season to season can also bring frogs and snakes into contact with roads and lead to an increase in their mortality rates.[36]

Birds

[edit]

The traffic load near large cities may show dramatic cyclical changes induced by weekend tourism, and this could induce cyclical changes in the activity patterns of birds.[49] Road implantation may also lead birds to avoid certain sites, as they are seen as being less habitable (because of increases in noise and chemical pollution). Certain bird populations may then become confined into smaller habitable sites, leading to an increase in possibility of extinction caused by illness or habitat perturbation.[50]

Facilitation of poaching of flora and fauna

[edit]
Main articles: Bush meat, Wildlife trade, and Illegal logging

Roads that run through forests that house edible animals may encourage or facilitate poaching. Especially in poor areas, the construction of roads has promoted not only poaching for personal consumption but also for sale (for consumption or as a pet) to third parties.[citation needed]

Similarly, the construction of roads in forested areas has also promoted illegal logging as it becomes easier for illegal loggers to transport the wood.[51]

Mitigation efforts

[edit]

Awareness

[edit]

Awareness needs to be spread among drivers particularly those driving on forest road on maintaining speed limits and being vigilant. Environment Conservation Group had initiated an awareness drive named PATH an acronym for Provide Animals safe Transit on Highways[52] covering more than 17,000 km in India to highlighting the importance of safe driving on forest roads.[53]

Road permeability

[edit]

Wildlife crossings that allow animals to safely cross human-made barriers such as roads, are intended not only to reduce roadkill, but ideally to provide connectivity of habitat areas, combating habitat fragmentation.[1][54] Wildlife crossings may include: underpass tunnels, viaducts, and overpasses.

Habitat construction and planting

[edit]

In Washington County, North Carolina, along Highway 64, a study was conducted to analyze the effects of wildlife underpasses on the local wildlife. Three wildlife underpasses were built with fencing around the highway in the study zones. The study showed that deer used the underpasses the most and made up 93% of all crossings. Mortality rates were calculated and showed that the numbers of deaths were lower near underpasses. This cannot be said about all animals. Some have smaller home ranges so they were not inclined to travel to underpasses to cross the road. Underpass would most likely benefit larger mammals such as bears, deer, and cougars. Underpasses were seen to lower mortality rates and increase local species ability to adapt to a habitat along a major road.[55]

Structural elements such as fencing or walls along road bridges can encourage birds and bats to fly higher over roads or underneath bridges, which lowers the chances of vehicle collisions.[56] Some animals, such as birds, are more vulnerable to disturbances during certain periods of the year, such as the breeding season.[56]

Recycling

[edit]

Materials removed from a road can be reused in construction within the same project[57] or in other locations. Road construction can also use waste materials from other industries.

Asphalt pavement is one of the most recycled materials in the United States. It is estimated that over 80% of asphalt pavement removed from roadways is reused as construction aggregate. It can be mixed into new pavement or used as a subbase or fill material. Similarly, concrete from road or building demolition can be an excellent source of aggregate.[58]

Common examples of waste products used in road building include coal fly ash (used to make concrete stronger), asphalt shingles and shredded tires (used in asphalt pavement), ground glass and steel mill slag (used as aggregates).[58]

In 2012, US asphalt plants used an estimated 68.3 million tons of reclaimed asphalt pavement, 1.86 million tons of recycled asphalt shingles, and over 1 million tons of other recycled materials to produce new asphalt.[59]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Forman, R.T.T.; Sperling, D.; Bissonette, J.A.; Clevenger, A.P.; Cutshall, C.D.; Dale, V.H.; Fahrig, L.; France, R.L.; Goldman, C.R.; Heanue, K. (2002). Road Ecology: Science and Solutions. Island Press. ISBN 978-1-55963-933-0.
  2. ^ Laurance, William F.; Goosem, Miriam; Laurance, Susan G.W. (2009). "Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 24 (12): 659–669. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009. PMID 19748151.
  3. ^ "Road Ecology Center (REC)". roadecology.ucdavis.edu. 2019-09-15. Retrieved 2019-09-15.
  4. ^ "Portal CBEE · Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Ecologia de Estradas". Cbee.ufla.br. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  5. ^ "Center for Transportation and the Environment (CTE)". Cte.ncsu.edu. 2014-08-19. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  6. ^ "Western Transportation Institute - Western Transportation Institute | Montana State University". Wti.montana.edu. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  7. ^ "IENE – Infra Eco Network Europe". Iene.info. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  8. ^ "2017 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation". ICOET. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  9. ^ "ANET". Ecologyandtransport.com. Archived from the original on 2019-11-03. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  10. ^ "Endangered Wildlife Trust". Ewt.org.za. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  11. ^ "How nitrogen oxides affect the way we live and breathe" (PDF). Environmental protection agency. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-07-16. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
  12. ^ "Redirect - Volatile Organic Compounds | Air Emission Sources | US EPA". Archived from the original on 2010-05-14. Retrieved 2010-04-25.
  13. ^ Omaye ST. (2002). "Metabolic modulation of carbon monoxide toxicity". Toxicology. 180 (2): 139–150. doi:10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00387-6. PMID 12324190.
  14. ^ "Vehicle exhaust emissions". Theaa.com. 2017-01-11. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  15. ^ "Traffic-related Air Pollution near Busy Roads". American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Vol 170. pp. 520-526. 2004.
  16. ^ "Road Dust - Something To Sneeze About." Science Daily, 1999-11-30. Sand applied to icy roads can be ground up by traffic into fine particulates and contribute to air pollution.
  17. ^ Emily Mangan; Rayla Bellis; Beth Osborne; Stephen Lee Davis; Sam Rockwell (October 2020). "Driving Down Emissions" (PDF). Transportation for America. Retrieved 2023-11-01.
  18. ^ "Tirana Outer Ring Road: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Study" (PDF). Bernard Engineers & Brenner Engineers. 2009. Retrieved 2010-04-27. [dead link‍]
  19. ^ "£371 million A3 improvements will go ahead" (Press release). Department for Transport. 2006-10-27. Retrieved 2011-07-04.
  20. ^ United States. National Research Council. Washington, DC. "Urban Stormwater Management in the United States." October 15, 2008. pp. 5, 110.
  21. ^ G. Allen Burton Jr.; Robert Pitt (2001). Stormwater Effects Handbook: A Toolbox for Watershed Managers, Scientists, and Engineers. New York: CRC/Lewis Publishers. ISBN 978-0-87371-924-7. Chapter 2.
  22. ^ Charles Seawell and Newland Agbenowosi (1998)."Effects of Road Deicing Salts on Groundwater Systems." Archived 2009-05-21 at the Wayback Machine Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Department of Civil Engineering.
  23. ^ University of Minnesota (2009). "U of M research finds most road salt is making it into the state's lakes and rivers." 2009-02-10.
  24. ^ Waara, Sylvia; Färm, Carina (May 2008). "An assessment of the potential toxicity of runoff from an urban roadscape during rain events". Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 15 (3): 205–210. doi:10.1065/espr2007.12.463. ISSN 0944-1344. PMID 18504838. S2CID 26523691.
  25. ^ Castillo, Anakena M.; Sharpe, Diana M. T.; Ghalambor, Cameron K.; León, Luis F. De (2018-02-01). "Exploring the effects of salinization on trophic diversity in freshwater ecosystems: a quantitative review". Hydrobiologia. 807 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10750-017-3403-0. ISSN 0018-8158. S2CID 34256287.
  26. ^ Hintz, William D.; Mattes, Brian M.; Schuler, Matthew S.; Jones, Devin K.; Stoler, Aaron B.; Lind, Lovisa; Relyea, Rick A. (2017-04-01). "Salinization triggers a trophic cascade in experimental freshwater communities with varying food-chain length". Ecological Applications. 27 (3): 833–844. doi:10.1002/eap.1487. ISSN 1939-5582. PMID 27992971.
  27. ^ a b c Devikarani M. Ramakrishna & Thiruvenkatachari Viraraghavan (2005). "Environmental Impact Of Chemical Deicers – A Review". Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 166 (1–4): 49–63. Bibcode:2005WASP..166...49R. doi:10.1007/s11270-005-8265-9. S2CID 97342847.
  28. ^ Heintzman, Rebecca L.; Titus, John E.; Zhu, Weixing (2015-02-01). "Effects of Roadside Deposition on Growth and Pollutant Accumulation by Willow (Salix miyabeana)". Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 226 (2): 11. Bibcode:2015WASP..226...11H. doi:10.1007/s11270-014-2270-9. ISSN 0049-6979. S2CID 93852240.
  29. ^ G. Blomqvist (1997-11-30). "Impact Of De-Icing Salt On Roadside Vegetation. A Literature Review". Vti Rapport (427A).
  30. ^ Harless, Meagan L.; Huckins, Casey J; Grant, Jacqualine B.; Pypker, Thomas G. (2011-07-01). "Effects of six chemical deicers on larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica)". Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 30 (7): 1637–1641. doi:10.1002/etc.544. ISSN 1552-8618. PMID 21472773. S2CID 25418331.
  31. ^ Lambert, Max R.; Stoler, Aaron B.; Smylie, Meredith S.; Relyea, Rick A.; Skelly, David K. (2016-11-22). "Interactive effects of road salt and leaf litter on wood frog sex ratios and sexual size dimorphism". Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 74 (2): 141–146. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2016-0324. hdl:1807/74970. ISSN 0706-652X.
  32. ^ Francis, Clinton D.; Ortega, Catherine P.; Cruz, Alexander (2009). "Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions". Current Biology. 19 (16): 1415–1419. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.052. PMID 19631542. S2CID 15985432.
  33. ^ Shier, D.M.; Lea, A.J.; Owen, M.A. (2012). "Beyond masking: Endangered Stephen's kangaroo rats respond to traffic noise with footdrumming". Biological Conservation. 150 (1): 53–58. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.007.
  34. ^ Grade, Aaron M.; Sieving, Kathryn E. (2016-04-01). "When the birds go unheard: highway noise disrupts information transfer between bird species". Biology Letters. 12 (4): 20160113. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2016.0113. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 4881358. PMID 27095267.
  35. ^ Nemeth, Erwin; Pieretti, Nadia; Zollinger, Sue Anne; Geberzahn, Nicole; Partecke, Jesko; Miranda, Ana Catarina; Brumm, Henrik (2013-03-07). "Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 280 (1754): 20122798. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2798. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 3574330. PMID 23303546.
  36. ^ a b Fahrig, Lenore, and Trina Rytwinski. "Effects Of Roads On Animal Abundance: An Empirical Review And Synthesis."Ecology and Society 14.1 (2009): 1-20. Environment Complete. Web. 25 Sept. 2013.
  37. ^ HABIB, LUCAS; BAYNE, ERIN M.; BOUTIN, STAN (2007-02-01). "Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla". Journal of Applied Ecology. 44 (1): 176–184. Bibcode:2007JApEc..44..176H. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01234.x. ISSN 1365-2664.
  38. ^ Injaian, Allison S.; Taff, Conor C.; Pearson, Kira L.; Gin, Michelle M. Y.; Patricelli, Gail L.; Vitousek, Maren N. (2018-11-01). "Effects of experimental chronic traffic noise exposure on adult and nestling corticosterone levels, and nestling body condition in a free-living bird". Hormones and Behavior. 106: 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.07.012. ISSN 0018-506X. PMID 30189211. S2CID 52171536.
  39. ^ Leonard, Marty L.; Horn, Andrew G. (2012-08-23). "Ambient noise increases missed detections in nestling birds". Biology Letters. 8 (4): 530–532. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0032. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 3391455. PMID 22357939.
  40. ^ Padgett, David A.; Glaser, Ronald (2003-08-01). "How stress influences the immune response". Trends in Immunology. 24 (8): 444–448. doi:10.1016/S1471-4906(03)00173-X. ISSN 1471-4906. PMID 12909458.
  41. ^ "FAQs for the North West Relief Road". Shropshire Council. 2010. Retrieved 2010-05-14.[permanent dead link‍]
  42. ^ a b Forman, R.T.T.; Alexander, L.E. (1998). "Roads and their major ecological effects" (PDF). Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 29: 207–31. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207.
  43. ^ a b c Primack, R.B. (2004). A Primer of Conservation Biology (3rd ed). Massachusetts, U.S.A.: Sinauer Associates, Inc. pp. 84–89. ISBN 978-0-87893-728-8.
  44. ^ Philip Clarke, G.; White, P.C.L.; Harris, S (1998). "Effects of roads on badger Meles meles populations in south-west England" (PDF). Biological Conservation. 86 (2): 117–124. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00018-4.
  45. ^ KELLER, I.; NENTWIG, W.; LARGIADÈR, C. R. (2004-10-01). "Recent habitat fragmentation due to roads can lead to significant genetic differentiation in an abundant flightless ground beetle". Molecular Ecology. 13 (10): 2983–2994. Bibcode:2004MolEc..13.2983K. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02310.x. ISSN 1365-294X. PMID 15367114. S2CID 30774198.
  46. ^ Eigenbrod, Felix; Hecnar, Stephen J.; Fahrig, Lenore (2008-02-01). "Accessible habitat: an improved measure of the effects of habitat loss and roads on wildlife populations". Landscape Ecology. 23 (2): 159–168. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9174-7. ISSN 0921-2973. S2CID 19947880.
  47. ^ Keddy, P.A. 2010. Wetland Ecology: Principles and Conservation (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 497 p.
  48. ^ Aresco, M. (2005). "The effect of sex-specific terrestrial movements and roads on the sex ratio of freshwater turtles". Biological Conservation. 123: 37–44. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.006.
  49. ^ Bautista, L.M.; García, J.T.; Calmaestra, R.G.; Palacín, C.; Martín, C.A.; Morales, M.B.; Bonal, R.; Viñuela, J. (2004). "Effect of weekend road traffic on the use of space by raptors". Conservation Biology. 18 (3): 725–732. Bibcode:2004ConBi..18..726B. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00499.x. hdl:10261/43806. S2CID 56389571.
  50. ^ Pinto, Márcia; Rocha, Pedro; Moreira, Francisco (2005). "Long-term trends in great bustard (Otis tarda) populations in Portugal suggest concentration in single high quality area". Biological Conservation. 124 (3): 415–423. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.047.
  51. ^ "Roads are ruining the rainforests | Illegal Logging Portal". Illegal-logging.info. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  52. ^ "Driven To Protect – A Journey Across India To Document Wild Roadkills". Sanctuaryasia.com. Retrieved 2017-05-23.
  53. ^ K. Jeshi. "Stop! The animals are crossing". The Hindu. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
  54. ^ Greenfield, Patrick (2021-01-23). "How creating wildlife crossings can help reindeer, bears – and even crabs". The Guardian. Retrieved 2021-01-25.
  55. ^ McCollister, Matthew F. & Frank T. Van Manen (2010). "Effectiveness of Wildlife Underpasses and Fencing to Reduce Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions". Journal of Wildlife Management. 74 (8): 1722–1731. doi:10.2193/2009-535. S2CID 86709243.
  56. ^ a b Kociolek, Angela; Grilo, Clara; Jacobson, Sandra (April 2015), van der Ree, Rodney; Smith, Daniel J.; Grilo, Clara (eds.), "Flight Doesn't Solve Everything: Mitigation of Road Impacts on Birds", Handbook of Road Ecology (1 ed.), Wiley, pp. 281–289, doi:10.1002/9781118568170.ch33, ISBN 978-1-118-56818-7, retrieved 2023-11-21
  57. ^ Sianipar, C.P.M.; Dowaki, K. (2014). "Eco-burden in pavement maintenance: Effects from excess traffic growth and overload". Sustainable Cities and Society. 12: 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2014.01.002.
  58. ^ a b User Guidelines for Waste and Byproduct Materials in Pavement Construction. Federal Highway Administration. 2012-04-23.
  59. ^ "Survey finds growth in recycled materials for asphalt". Construction and Demolition Recycling. February 5, 2014. Archived from the original on February 23, 2014.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Road_ecology&oldid=1232884374"