Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Fish
Appearance
This is a list of all the reasons that were written by Morris Fish during his tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada up to the end of 2007.
2004
[edit]
|
Case name | Issue | Co-authored by | Joined by | |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Lyttle [2004] 1 SCR 193; 2004 SCC 5 [1] |
Cross examination | Major J. | Unanimous | |
Transport North American Express Inc v New Solutions Financial Corp [2004] 1 SCR 249; 2004 SCC 7 [2] |
Illegal contracts. | None | Deschamps J. | |
R v Kehler [2004] 1 SCR 328; 2004 SCC 11 [3] |
Corroborating evidence by an accomplice | None | Unanimous | |
R v Fontaine [2004] 1 SCR 702; 2004 SCC 27 [4] |
Mental disorder automatism | None | Unanimous | |
Monsanto Canada Inc v Schmeiser [2004] 1 SCR 902; 2004 SCC 34 [5] |
Biological patent | McLachlin C.J. | Major, Binnie and Deschamps JJ. | |
Banque nationale de Paris (Canada) v 165836 Canada Inc [2004] 2 SCR 45; 2004 SCC 37 [6] |
Law of obligations | None | McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, Arbour, LeBel JJ. | |
Cabiakman v Industrial Alliance Life Insurance Co [2004] 3 SCR 195; 2004 SCC 55 [7] |
Employment law | LeBel J. | Iacobucci, Bastarache, Binnie, and Deschamps JJ. | |
Glykis v Hydro-Québec [2004] 3 SCR 285; 2004 SCC 60 [8] |
Interruptions of public services | LeBel J. | None | |
R v Sazant [2004] 3 SCR 635; 2004 SCC 77 [9] |
Preliminary hearings | Bastarache J. | None | |
Martineau v MNR [2004] 3 SCR 737; 2004 SCC 81 [10] |
Self-incrimination; Charter rights | None | Unanimous | |
2005
[edit]
|
Case name | Issue | Co-authored by | Joined by | |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Clark [2005] 1 SCR 6; 2005 SCC 2 [11] |
Criminal disorderly conduct | None | Unanimous | |
R v Roberts [2005] 1 SCR 22; 2005 SCC 3 [12] |
Defence of provocation | None | None | |
R v Ménard [2005] 1 SCR 24; 2005 SCC 4 [13] |
Appealing jury verdict; jury instruction | None | Unanimous | |
R v Decorte [2005] 1 SCR 133; 2005 SCC 9 [14] |
Arbitrary convention; Charter; First Nation police powers | None | Unanimous | |
R v Paice [2005] 1 SCR 339; 2005 SCC 22 [15] |
Defence of consent; R. v. Jobidon | None | None | |
R v Chow [2005] 1 SCR 384; 2005 SCC 24 [16] |
interception of communications | None | Unanimous | |
HL v Canada (AG) [2005] 1 SCR 401; 2005 SCC 25 [17] |
Appellate review, questions of fact | None | McLachlin C.J. and Major, Binnie and Abella JJ. | |
R v Dionne [2005] 1 SCR 665; 2005 SCC 29 [18] |
Circumstantial evidence | None | Unanimous | |
R v Fice [2005] 1 SCR 742; 2005 SCC 32 [19] |
Conditional sentencing | None | Deschamps J. | |
Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd v Ontario [2005] 2 SCR 188; 2005 SCC 41 [20] |
Freedom of the Press, open courts | None | Unanimous | |
R v Woods [2005] 2 SCR 205; 2005 SCC 42 [21] |
Compelling breath samples | None | Unanimous | |
R v Hamilton [2005] 2 SCR 432; 2005 SCC 47 [22] |
Counselling criminal offences by email | None | McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel and Deschamps JJ. | |
R v RC [2005] 3 SCR 99; 2005 SCC 61 [23] |
Forensic DNA analysis | None | McLachlin C.J. and Major, Binnie and Deschamps JJ. | |
Contino v Leonelli-Contino [2005] 3 SCR 217; 2005 SCC 63 [24] |
Shared custody | None | None | |
May v Ferndale Institution [2005] 3 SCR 809; 2005 SCC 82 [25] |
Transfer inmates; Habeas corpus | LeBel J. | McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, Deschamps and Abella JJ. | |
2006
[edit]
|
Case name | Issue | Co-authored by | Joined by | |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Chaisson 1 SCR 415; 2006 SCC 11 [26] |
Arbitrary detention; appeals | None | Unanimous | |
R v Rodgers 1 SCR 554; 2006 SCC 15 [27] |
DNA samples; Charter | None | Binnie and Deschamps JJ. | |
R v Graveline 1 SCR 609; 2006 SCC 16 [28] |
Criminal appeals | None | McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Binnie, Abella and Charron JJ. | |
R v Gagnon 2 SCR 621; 2006 SCC 17 [29] |
Giving reasons for a judgment | Deschamps J. | None | |
Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice) 2006 SCC 39 [30] |
Solitictor-client privilege | None | McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, Deschamps and Abella JJ. | |
Robertson v Thomson Corp 2006 SCC 43 [31] |
copyright in electronic databases | LeBel J. | Bastarache, Deschamps, Rothstein JJ. | |
R v Krieger 2006 SCC 47 [32] |
Right to trial by jury; jury nullification | None | Unanimous | |
R v Déry 2006 SCC 53 [33] |
Attempted conspiracy | None | Unanimous | |
R v Angelillo 2006 SCC 55 [34] |
Sentencing; fresh evidence | None | Binnie J. | |
R v Larche 2006 SCC 56 [35] |
Sentencing | None | Unanimous | |
R v Morris 2006 SCC 59 [36] |
Aboriginal treaty rights | McLachlin C.J. | None | |
2007
[edit]This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (March 2018) |
2008
[edit]This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (March 2018) |
2009
[edit]This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (March 2018) |
2010
[edit]
|
Case name | Issue | Co-authored by | Joined by | |
---|---|---|---|---|
XXX CITATIONS [URL] |
XXX | XXX | XXX | |
XXX CITATIONS [URL] |
XXX | XXX | XXX |
2011
[edit]
|
Case name | Issue | Co-authored by | Joined by | |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v Bruce 2011 SCC 4 [37] |
Reasonableness of trial verdict | – | – | |
Smith v Alliance Pipeline Ltd 2011 SCC 7 [38] |
Standard of review for Pipeline Arbitration Committee appointed pursuant to the National Energy Board Act | – | McLachlin CJ and Binnie, LeBel, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ | |
R v Miljevic 2011 SCC 8 [39] |
Whether trial judge erred in response to jury's questions | – | McLachlin CJ and Deschamps J | |
R v SD 2011 SCC 14 [40] |
Whether the fact the accused was convicted of an offence on a date other than the one referred to in the indictment affected trial fairness | – | – | |
R v St-Onge 2011 SCC 16 [41] |
Whether Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada erred when substituting its own balancing of factors relevant to sentencing for that of a military judge — Whether Supreme Court of Canada has jurisdiction to hear appeal | – | Unanimous | |
R v JA 2011 SCC 28 [42] |
Whether in offence of sexual assault, Criminal Code defines "consent" as requiring conscious, operating mind throughout sexual activity, or whether consent to sexual activity may be given prior to period of unconsciousness | – | Binnie and LeBel JJ | |
R v EMW 2011 SCC 31 [43] |
Jurisdiction of a court of appeal to consider whether there was a miscarriage of justice — Whether there was a miscarriage of justice | – | – | |
R v Sinclair 2011 SCC 40 [44] |
XXX | – | McLachlin CJ and Binnie and Cromwell JJ | |
Crookes v Newton 2011 SCC 47 [45] |
Tort of libel and slander — Whether a hyperlink to an allegedly defamatory article in itself constitutes a publication | McLachlin CJ | – | |
R v Barros 2011 SCC 51 [46] |
Whether investigator hired by the defence is bound by informer privilege — Whether trial judge committed errors of law allowing appellate review of acquittals for offences of obstructing justice and extortion | – | – | |
Nor-Man Regional Health Authority Inc v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals 2011 SCC 59 [47] |
Whether a labour arbitration award applying a common law or equitable remedy is reviewable on standard of reasonableness or correctness | – | Unanimous |
2012
[edit]
|
2013
[edit]
|
Case name | Issue | Co-authored by | Joined by | |
---|---|---|---|---|
R v O'Brien 2013 SCC 2 [57] |
Offence of uttering threats | – | Cromwell, Moldaver and Wagner JJ | |
R v Manning 2013 SCC 1 [58] |
Forfeiture orders | – | Unanimous | |
R v Ryan 2013 SCC 3 [59] |
Criminal defence of duress | – | – | |
R v Sanichar 2013 SCC 4 [60] |
Whether appellate court erred in setting aside convictions and ordering a new trial | – | – | |
R v Taylor 2013 SCC 10 [61] |
Whether trial judge erred in rejecting evidence | – | Cromwell J (oral) | |
R v Levkovic 2013 SCC 25 [62] |
Constitutional challenge of s. 243 of the Criminal Code under s. 7 of the Charter on grounds of vagueness | – | Unanimous | |
R v Buzizi 2013 SCC 27 [63] |
Criminal defence of provocation and whether the defence should have been put to the jury | – | Moldaver and Karakatsanis JJ | |
R v Gauthier 2013 SCC 32 [64] |
Elements of the criminal defence of abandonment | – | – | |
R v Baldree 2013 SCC 35 [65] |
Admissibility of hearsay evidence | – | McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ | |
Ezokola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2013 SCC 40 [66] |
Rejection of refugee applicant on grounds of complicity in crimes against humanity; Whether passive acquiescence is sufficient to establish complicity | LeBel J | Unanimous | |
Ontario v Criminal Lawyers' Association of Ontario 2013 SCC 43 [67] |
Jurisdiction of courts – Whether superior and statutory courts have inherent jurisdiction to determine the rate of remuneration of amici curiae | – | LeBel, Abella and Cromwell JJ | |
Divito v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) 2013 SCC 47 [68] |
Constitutional challenge of provisions of the International Transfer of Offenders Act under mobility rights under s. 6(1) of the Charter | LeBel J | McLachlin CJ | |
R v Pappas 2013 SCC 56 [69] |
Defence of provocation | – | – | |
R v Hay 2013 SCC 61 [70] |
Jury charges and eyewitness evidence | – | – | |
La Souveraine, Compagnie d'assurance générale v Autorité des marchés financiers 2013 SCC 63 [71] |
Provincial offences and strict liability under the Quebec Act respecting the distribution of financial products and services | – | LeBel J |