Jump to content

J. J. C. Smart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Rate of passage argument)

J. J. C. Smart
AC FAHA
Born
John Jamieson Carswell Smart

(1920-09-16)16 September 1920
Cambridge, England
Died6 October 2012(2012-10-06) (aged 92)[2]
Melbourne, Australia
Nationality
  • Australian
  • British
Other namesJack Smart
Alma mater
Era20th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
School
Institutions
Academic advisorsGilbert Ryle
Doctoral studentsMark Colyvan
Phillip H. Wiebe
Other notable studentsJeff Malpas[1]
Henry Krips[1]
Main interests
Notable ideas

John Jamieson Carswell Smart AC FAHA (16 September 1920 – 6 October 2012)[2] was a British-Australian philosopher who was appointed as an Emeritus Professor by the Australian National University. He worked in the fields of metaphysics, philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, philosophy of religion, and political philosophy. He wrote several entries for the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.[3][4]

Career

[edit]

Born in Cambridge, England, of Scottish parents, Smart began his education locally, attending The Leys School, a leading independent boarding school. His younger brothers also became professors: Alastair (1922–1992) was Professor of Art History at Nottingham University; Ninian was a professor of religious studies and a pioneer in that field. Their father, William Marshall Smart, was John Couch Adams Astronomer at Cambridge University and later Regius Professor of Astronomy at Glasgow. In 1950, W. M. Smart was President of the Royal Astronomical Society. In 1946, Jack Smart graduated from the University of Glasgow with an MA, followed by a BPhil from Oxford University in 1948. He then worked as a Junior Research Fellow at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, for two years.

Smart served in the Second World War with the British Army where he was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Royal Corps of Signals on 9 October 1941 and given the service number 212091.[5][6] His war service was mainly in India and Burma.[6] He was demobilised in April 1946 and in 1950 was granted the honorary rank of lieutenant.[6]

He arrived in Australia in August 1950 to take up the Chair of Philosophy at the University of Adelaide, which he occupied from 1950 until 1972. After twenty-two years in Adelaide, he moved to La Trobe University where he was Reader in Philosophy from 1972 to 1976. He then moved to the Australian National University where he was Professor of Philosophy in the Research School of Social Sciences from 1976 until his retirement in 1985, and where the annual Jack Smart Lecture is held in his honour.[7] Following his retirement he was Emeritus Professor at Monash University.

Smart was a Foundation Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities at its establishment in 1969.[8] In 1990 he was awarded the Companion in the General Division of the Order of Australia.[9] In 1991 he was elected to become an honorary Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, and in 2010, elected to become an honorary Fellow of Queen's College, Oxford.[9]

At first Smart was a behaviourist before becoming an early proponent of type identity theory.[10]

Metaphysics

[edit]

Smart's main contribution to metaphysics is in the area of philosophy of time. He has been an influential defender of the B-theory of time, and of perdurantism.

His most important original arguments in this area concern the passage of time, which he claimed is an illusion. He argued that if time really passed, then it would make sense to ask at what rate it passes, but this requires some second time-dimension with respect to which passage of normal time can be measured. This in turn faces the same problems, and so there must be a third time-dimension, and so on.[11] This is called the rate of passage argument and it was originally put forward by C. D. Broad.[12][13]

Smart changed his mind about the nature and causes of the illusion of the passage of time. In the 1950s, he held that it was due to people's use of anthropocentric temporal language. He later came to abandon this linguistic explanation of the illusion in favour of a psychological explanation in terms of the passage of memories from short-term to long-term memory.

Philosophy of mind

[edit]

Regarding the philosophy of mind, Smart was a physicalist. In the 1950s, he was also one of the originators, with Ullin Place, of the mind–brain identity theory, which claims that particular states of mind are identical with particular states of the brain. Initially, this view was dubbed "Australian materialism" by its detractors, in reference to the stereotype of Australians as "down-to-earth" and "unsophisticated".

Smart's identity theory dealt with some extremely long-standing objections to physicalism by comparing the mind–brain identity thesis to other identity theses well known from science, such as the thesis that lightning is an electrical discharge, or that the morning star is the evening star. Although these identity theses give rise to puzzles such as Gottlob Frege's puzzle of the Morning Star and Evening Star, in the scientific cases, some claim that it would be absurd to reject the identity theses on this ground. Since the puzzles facing physicalism are strictly analogous to the scientific identity theses, it would then also be absurd to reject physicalism on the grounds that it gives rise to these puzzles.

Ethics

[edit]

In ethics, Smart was a defender of utilitarianism. Specifically, he defended "extreme", or act utilitarianism, as opposed to "restricted", or rule utilitarianism. The distinction between these two types of ethical theory is explained in his essay Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.[14]

Smart gave two arguments against rule utilitarianism. According to the first, rule utilitarianism collapses into act utilitarianism because there is no adequate criterion on what can count as a "rule". According to the second, even if there were such a criterion, the rule utilitarian would be committed to the untenable position of preferring to follow a rule, even if it would be better if the rule were broken, which Smart called "superstitious rule worship".[15]

Another aspect of Smart's ethical theory is his acceptance of a preference theory of well-being, which contrasts with the hedonism associated with "classical" utilitarians such as Jeremy Bentham. Smart's combination of the preference theory with consequentialism is sometimes called "preference utilitarianism".

Smart's arguments against rule utilitarianism have been very influential, contributing to a steady decline in its popularity among ethicists during the late 20th century. Worldwide, his defence of act utilitarianism and preference theory has been less prominent but has influenced philosophers who have worked or been educated in Australia, such as Frank Jackson, Philip Pettit, and Peter Singer.

One of Smart's two entries in The Philosophical Lexicon refers to his approach to the consequences of act utilitarianism: to "outsmart" an opponent is "to embrace the conclusion of one's opponent's reductio ad absurdum argument."[16] This move is more commonly called "biting the bullet".

Works

[edit]
"Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism", The Philosophical Quarterly, Oct. 1956, pages 344–354.[17]
An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics, 1961.[18]
Philosophy and Scientific Realism, 1963.[19][20][21]
Problems of Space and Time, 1964 (edited, with introduction).
Between Science and Philosophy: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, 1968.
Utilitarianism : For and Against (co-authored with Bernard Williams; 1973)
Ethics, Persuasion and Truth, 1984.
Essays Metaphysical and Moral,1987.
Our Place in the Universe: A Metaphysical Discussion, 1989.
Atheism and Theism (Great Debates in Philosophy) (including contributions by John Haldane; 1996)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Tree – David Chalmers". Retrieved 22 July 2020.
  2. ^ a b "J.J.C. (Jack) SMART Obituary: View J.J.C. SMART's Obituary by The Canberra Times". Tributes.canberratimes.com.au. Archived from the original on 17 December 2019. Retrieved 14 October 2012.
  3. ^ Smart, J. J. C. (2017), "The Mind/Brain Identity Theory", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 16 September 2019
  4. ^ Smart, J. J. C. (9 March 2004). "Atheism and Agnosticism". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. ^ "No. 35306". The London Gazette (Supplement). 10 October 1941. p. 5938.
  6. ^ a b c "British Army officer histories". Unit Histories. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
  7. ^ [1][dead link‍]
  8. ^ "Our history". Australian Academy of the Humanities. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  9. ^ a b "Monash University Website". Archived from the original on 21 March 2012.
  10. ^ Smart, J. J. C. (5 May 2017). "The Mind/Brain Identity Theory". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University – via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  11. ^ Smart, Jack (1960). "River of Time". In Flew, Antony (ed.). Essays in Conceptual Analysis. Macmillan & Co. pp. 214–215.
  12. ^ J. J. C. Smart, "The river of time", Mind 58 (232):483–494 (1949). JSTOR 2250877
  13. ^ Ned Markosian, "How fast does time pass?", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53(4):829–844 (1993). JSTOR 2108255
  14. ^ Smart, J. J. C. (1956). "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism". The Philosophical Quarterly. 6 (25): 344–354. doi:10.2307/2216786. JSTOR 2216786. Based on a paper read to the Victorian Branch of the Australasian Association of Psychology and philosophy, Oct. 1955. Smart later stated that he made mistakes in this essay (for example, that probably maximizing benefit is not the same thing as maximizing probable benefit). However, perhaps because of this very fact, that is, perhaps because Smart did not fall prey to what might be called the "philosopher's disease" of attempting to be obsessively precise, this essay lays out a clear, readable presentation of act utilitarianism.
  15. ^ Smart, J. J. C. (1956). "Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism". The Philosophical Quarterly. 6 (25): 344–354. doi:10.2307/2216786. JSTOR 2216786. Based on a paper read to the Victorian Branch of the Australasian Association of Psychology and philosophy, Oct. 1955. Smart's views on rule utilitarianism have been challenged, for example by Alan Gibbard
  16. ^ "PDF | The Philosophical Lexicon, 8th Edition | ID: jw827p68f | Tufts Digital Library". dl.tufts.edu. Retrieved 24 September 2022.
  17. ^ Corrected and reprinted in Philippa Foot (ed.), Theories of Ethics (1967), and Michael D. Bayles (ed.), Contemporary Utilitarianism (1968).
  18. ^ Reprinted in Utilitarianism : For and Against (1973), with Smart's chapter "Act-Utilitarianism and Rule-Utilitarianism" also being republished in Readings in the problems of ethics (1965) and Morality and the Good Life (1997).
  19. ^ Caton, Charles E. (1965). "Review of Philosophy and Scientific Realism". The Philosophical Review. 74 (4): 537–539. doi:10.2307/2183132. ISSN 0031-8108. JSTOR 2183132.
  20. ^ Alexander, Peter (1966). "New Books". Mind. 75 (299): 442–444. doi:10.1093/mind/LXXV.299.442. ISSN 0026-4423. JSTOR 2251839.
  21. ^ Hirst, R. J. (1 February 1965). "J. J. C. Smart, Philosophy and Scientific Realism". The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 15 (60): 358–360. doi:10.1093/bjps/XV.60.358. ISSN 0007-0882.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related to J. J. C. Smart.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._J._C._Smart&oldid=1223462219#Metaphysics"