Rajbala v. State of Haryana

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for events. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.
Find sources: "Rajbala v. State of Haryana" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (May 2016)

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Rajbala v. State of Haryana" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (September 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Rajbala v. State of Haryana (2016) 1 SCC 463 is a judgment of the Supreme Court of India

Rajbala v. State of Haryana

Court	Supreme Court of India
Full case name	Rajbala and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Decided	10 December 2015
Citation	Writ Petition (Civil) No. 671 of 2015; (2016) 1 SCC 463 AIR 2016 SC 33
Court membership
Judge sitting	J.Chelameswar & Abhay Manohar Sapre
Case opinions
The Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015 was challenged under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court of India dismissed the challenge and upheld the constitutionality of the Act.
Decision by	J.Chelameswar
Concurrence	Abhay Manohar Sapre