R v Mubila
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
R v Mubila | |
---|---|
Court | Southern Rhodesia, Bulawayo |
Full case name | R v Mubila |
Decided | 17 August 1955 |
Citation | 1956 (1) SA 31 (SR) |
Court membership | |
Judge sitting | Beadle J and assessors |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | Beadle J |
Keywords | |
Criminal law, Murder, Causation, Novus actus interveniens, Proximate cause |
R v Mubila is an important case in South African and Zimbabwean criminal law, heard on August 17, 1955, in which the accused was charged with murder. DP McCormac appeared for the Crown, and John Morris for the accused.
Its significance lies particularly in the area of legal causation. The court expressed negatively the idea of a proximate cause, with the statement that there must be no novus actus interveniens between X's conduct and Y's death; it also expressed it positively, in the contention that Y's death must follow directly from X's conduct.
The court held that, when a complainant has been injured as the result of an assault upon him, he has no obligation to obtain medical assistance to alleviate the gravity of the wound. Nor is there any obligation on him to follow rigidly all the advice given him by his medical advisers if he does seek that assistance. Provided that, in disregarding that advice, he does not introduce some new danger which would not have existed had the advice never been taken at all, his failure to follow that advice cannot be a factor which can avail the accused in any argument that the original injury was not the cause of death.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- R v Mubila 1956 (1) SA 31 (SR).
- John Burke (ed). Current Law Year Book 1956. Paragraph 2020.
- G Feltoe, "Causation and Foreseeability in Culpable Homicide", The Rhodesian Law Journal 1969, 144 at 150 (Volume 9)
Notes
[edit]