R v Mapara
 | This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (July 2024) |
| R v Mapara | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Hearing: 16 December 2004 Judgment: 27 April 2005 | |
| Full case name | Sameer Mapara v Her Majesty The Queen |
| Citations | [2005] 1 SCR 358, 2005 SCC 23 |
| Docket No. | 29750 [1] |
| Prior history | On appeal from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia. |
| Court membership | |
| Reasons given | |
| Majority | McLachlin C.J., joined by Bastarache, Binnie, Abella and Charron JJ. |
| Concurrence | LeBel J., joined by Fish J. |
| Major and Deschamps JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
R v Mapara, 2005 1 S.C.R. 358, 2005 SCC 23, was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on criminal conspiracy.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ SCC Case Information - Docket 29750 Supreme Court of Canada
External links
[edit]- Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision available at LexUM and CanLII
.svg){kind=small}  | This article about Canadian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |