R v Dytham
R v Dytham [1979] QB 722 is an English criminal law case dealing with liability for omissions. The court upheld the common law mantra that if there is a duty to act, then failure to do so is an offence.[1]
A police officer from St. Helens, witnessed the death of a nightclubber outside Cindy's nightclub but took no action to help because, had he reported it then Dytham would have had to stay beyond the end of his shift. The defendant was convicted of the common law offence of misconduct in a public office.[2] The court rejected the defendant's contention that this offence required malfeasance, or at least misfeasance, and did not extend to non-feasance.[3]
The court held that as a police officer, he had a duty of care to all of society, unlike civilians, in which case, there is no duty to put oneself at harm.
References
[edit]- ^ Halsbury's Laws of England, volume 25: "Circumstances", paragraph 6 (5th edition)
- ^ Mead, Geoffrey (1991). "Contracting into Crime: A Theory of Criminal Omissions". Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 11 (2): 147–173. ISSN 0143-6503.
- ^ David Ormerod; David Perry, eds. (2023). Blackstone’s Criminal Practice 2024 (34 ed.). Oxford University Press. A1.19. ISBN 9780198892489.
  | This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This crime-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |