R (Bidar) v London Borough of Ealing

R (Bidar) v London Borough of Ealing, SS for Education and Skills
European Court of Justice
Decided 15 March 2005
Full case name	Dany Bidar v London Borough of Ealing and Secretary of State for Education and Skills
Case	C-209/03
CelexID	61983CJ0293
ECLI	ECLI:EU:C:2005:169
Language of proceedings	English
Court composition
Advocate General General Geelhoed
Keywords
Free movement of citizens

R (Bidar) v London Borough of Ealing, SS for Education and Skills is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of citizens in the European Union.

Facts

Danny Bidar, was French, and lived with his grandmother in the UK from August 1998, with his mother, who had cancer and died. He attended the local secondary school, and began reading UCL economics in September 2001. He received assistance with tuition fees (following Gravier v City of Liège), but his application for a student loan was refused on the ground that he did not have ‘settled’ status.

AG Geelhoed referred to concerns of "benefit tourism".

Judgment

The Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice held that Bidar could not be denied the student loan on the basis that he did not have settled status. Bidar was an EU citizen, lawfully resident under TFEU art 21, in conjunction with the Persons of Independent Means Directive 90/364 (now the Citizens Rights Directive article 7(1)(b)). He satisfied those conditions. He was entitled under TFEU art 18 to social assistance benefits, and these included maintenance costs through subsidised loans or grants. Student assistance fell within the treaty scope. The English rules were indirect discrimination. It was legitimate for a member state to grant assistance only to those with a degree of integration. The three year rule was compatible with EU law, but the requirement to have settled status was not, because it was impossible for a student from another member state to obtain it.

See also

• European Union law