Quercus parvula
| Quercus parvula | |
|---|---|
.jpg)
| |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Kingdom: | Plantae |
| Clade: | Tracheophytes |
| Clade: | Angiosperms |
| Clade: | Eudicots |
| Clade: | Rosids |
| Order: | Fagales |
| Family: | Fagaceae |
| Genus: | Quercus |
| Subgenus: | Quercus subg. Quercus |
| Section: | Quercus sect. Lobatae |
| Species: | Q. parvula
|
| Binomial name | |
| Quercus parvula | |
Quercus parvula, the Santa Cruz Island oak, is an evergreen red oak found on north-facing Santa Cruz Island slopes and in the California Coast Ranges from Santa Barbara County north to Mendocino County. It was taxonomically combined with Quercus wislizeni until resurrected as a separate species by Kevin Nixon in 1980.[2] The type locality of Q. parvula var. shrevei (originally described by C.H. Muller as Q. shrevei) is Palo Colorado Canyon in Monterey County. It is placed in Quercus section Lobatae.[3]
Three varieties of Q. parvula are currently recognized:[4]
| Image | Scientific name | Description | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Quercus parvula var. parvula[5] | Recent work suggests Q. parvula var. parvula to be Q. parvula var. shrevei x Q. wislizeni. | Santa Cruz Island oak[4] - Santa Cruz Island, California. |
| Quercus parvula var. shrevei[2][6] Shreve oak[4] | If further studies support the recently identified issues with var. parvula, this taxon may be revised to Q. shrevei. | forest oak[7] - central and northern coastal California. | |
| Quercus parvula var. tamalpaisensis | This is an invalid taxon. Recent DNA studies have shown Tamalpais oak to be a hybrid between Q. wislizeni and Q. parvula var. shrevei.[8] | Tamalpais oak[9] - Marin County, California. |
Q. parvula differs morphologically from its close relative Q. wislizeni in the following ways:[8]
- Leaf blades are larger, > (2)4 cm long rather than < 4(6) cm
- Leaf blades are thinner, generally < 0.26 mm near the apex rather than usually > 0.26 mm
- Current year twigs are 5-sided rather than ± roundish in cross section
- Leaf petioles and current year twigs are glabrous to sparsely hairy rather than moderately to very hairy
- Nut tips are blunt rather than more sharply pointed
- Abaxial golden glandular uniseriate leaf blade trichomes are missing or sparse rather than moderate to dense
- Abaxial multiradiate leaf blade trichomes are missing or sparse on the midvein rather than occasional to common
- Secondary leaf blade veins are raised abaxially rather than ± not raised
Q. parvula and Q. wislizeni never produce newly emerging leaves with a velvety coating of red bulbous trichomes on the abaxial (upper) surface. This separates them from Q. kelloggii and both varieties of Q. agrifolia which produce such leaves.
Ecology
[edit]Mainland Q. parvula is commonly found with or near Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood), and often near Q. agrifolia var. agrifolia (coast live oak) and Notholithocarpus densiflorus (tanoak).
Q. parvula differs ecologically from Q. wislizeni in the following ways:[8]
- Island or coastal habitat rather than Sierra foothills
- Associates with Sequoia sempervirens rather than Pinus sabiniana
Hybridization
[edit]Quercus parvula is theoretically capable of hybridizing with all of the other California red oaks except the higher elevation southern California Quercus agrifolia var. oxyadenia[10] (sharpacorn oak)[11] from which it is separated by the Transverse Ranges. However Q. parvula's generally later flowering time (April–May versus February–April for Q. kelloggii, Q. wislizeni and Q. agrifolia) may limit genetic exchange with other Lobatae.
References
[edit]- ^ Kua, C.-S. (2016). "Quercus parvula". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016: e.T62538A3116230. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T62538A3116230.en. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
- ^ a b K. Nixon, "A Systematic Study of Quercus parvula Greene on Santa Cruz Island and Mainland California," Master's Thesis, 1980.
- ^ Denk, Thomas; Grimm, Guido W.; Manos, Paul S.; Deng, Min & Hipp, Andrew L. (2017). "Appendix 2.1: An updated infrageneric classification of the oaks" (xls). figshare. Retrieved 2023-02-24.
- ^ a b c Jepson Flora Project (eds.) 2015 Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html July 17, 2015
- ^ Greene, Pittonia 1:40 (1887)
- ^ K. Nixon, C.H. Muller, “New Names in California Oaks,” Novon 4(4):391 (1994)
- ^ R. Morgan et al, in Santa Cruz Cnty. Pl. Checklst., 22 (2005)
- ^ a b c Duncan A. Hauser, Al Keuter, John D. McVay, Andrew L. Hipp and Paul S. Manos, The evolution and diversification of the red oaks of the California Floristic Province (Quercus section Lobatae, series Agrifoliae), October 2017 104:1581-1595
- ^ S.K. Langer, “A New Oak On Mount Tamalpais,” Four Seasons, 9(3): 21-30 (1993)
- ^ Torr., Sitgr. Rep., 172, pl. 17 (1853)
- ^ J.G. Cooper, Smithsonian Rep. 1858: 261 (1859)