Quality of well-being scale
The Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB) is a general health quality of life questionnaire which measures overall status and well-being over the previous three days in four areas: physical activities, social activities, mobility, and symptom/problem complexes.[1]
It consists of 71 items and takes 20 minutes to complete.[2] There are two different versions of the QWB; the original was designed to be administered by an interviewer, and the second development (the QWB-SA) was designed to be self-administered.[3]
The four domain scores of the questionnaire are combined into a total score that ranges from 0 to 1.0, with 1.0 representing optimum function and 0 representing death.[4]
Development
[edit]The QWB was originally called the Health Status Index, then the Index of Well-Being, and then eventually became the Quality of Well-Being Scale.[2] It has undergone several modifications since its development.
The process of administering the QWB can be described in three stages. They are the assessment of functional status, scaling the responses and indicating prognosis.
Assessment of functional status involves a structured interview which records the symptoms and problems experienced over the last eight days. It is used to classify the patient’s level of functioning. The interview takes about seven minutes or longer, according to the patient’s level of health. Questions in the interview covered three criteria of functioning: physical activity, social activity and mobility and confinement. The interview also records the presence of symptoms or problem complexes, which are problems that were experienced on the previous day, but were not being experienced at the present time.[5]
The responses from the interview were then scaled. Preference weights were given for each function level by 867 raters. The preference weights indicated the social judgement of the importance of each function level. A score is generated, which is known as W. W can then be adjusted to reflect the prognosis of a given medical condition.[2]
International use
[edit]Since the development of the Quality of Well-Being Scale and the consequent Quality of Well-Being Scale-Self Administered, the questionnaire has been utilized in numerous studies worldwide. Due to the general nature of the questionnaire, it has proven useful in a variety of different formats and contexts.
One way in which the QWB and the QWB-SA has been utilized is that it has been a comparator used to validate other measures, or a starting point for creating subscales of the questionnaire. An example of this is a subscale developed for use with the QWB-SA that assesses mental health,[6] a comparator study seeking to investigate the Health and Activity Limitation Index[7] and a study seeking to validate a new questionnaire called the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D.[8]
The QWB and the QWB-SA have also been validated or assessed for suitability in various cultures and countries. The QWB has been assessed for use in Trinidad and Tobago[9] and the QWB-SA has been validated for German patients with prostate disease,[10] as well as Chinese patients with epilepsy.[11] When the QWB-SA's Spanish version was assessed for its applicability in Spain, researchers identified some sociocultural issues in the translation. For example, some translated terms and usage applied US-specific concepts and regional lexical choices and cannot be successfully implemented in Spain without adaptation.[12]
See also
[edit]Self-perceived quality-of-life scale
References
[edit]- ^ "Rehab Measures: Quality of Well Being and Self-Administered version". RehabMeasures.org. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- ^ a b c McDowell, Ian (2006). MEASURING HEALTH: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (PDF). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 675–683. ISBN 978-0195165678.
- ^ "Quality of Well Being". SCIREproject.com. Monkey Hill Health Communications. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- ^ "Health-Related Quality of Life Measures". HealthMeasurement.org. The Health Measurement Research Group. Retrieved 11 December 2013.
- ^ Busija, L; Pausenberger, E; Haines, TP; Haymes, S; Buchbinder, R; Osborne, RH (Nov 2011). "Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)" (PDF). Arthritis Care & Research. 63 (Suppl 11): S383–412. doi:10.1002/acr.20541. PMID 22588759.
- ^ Sarkin, AJ; Groessl, EJ; Carlson, JA; Tally, SR; Kaplan, RM; Sieber, WJ; Ganiats, TG (Sep 2013). "Development and validation of a mental health subscale from the Quality of Well-Being Self-Administered". Quality of Life Research. 22 (7): 1685–96. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0296-2. PMC 4819419. PMID 23104088.
- ^ Boslaugh, SE; Andresen, EM; Recktenwald, A; Gillespie, K (Jan 2009). "Evidence for potential bias in the Health and Activity Limitation Index as a health preference measure for persons with disabilities". Disability and Health Journal. 2 (1): 20–6. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.004. PMID 21122739.
- ^ Richardson, J; Iezzi, A; Khan, MA; Maxwell, A (Nov 23, 2013). "Validity and Reliability of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument". The Patient. 7 (1): 85–96. doi:10.1007/s40271-013-0036-x. PMC 3929769. PMID 24271592.
- ^ Hector RD, Sr; Anderson, JP; Paul, RC; Weiss, RE; Hays, RD; Kaplan, RM (Jun 2010). "Health state preferences are equivalent in the United States and Trinidad and Tobago". Quality of Life Research. 19 (5): 729–38. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9630-8. PMC 2874060. PMID 20237958.
- ^ Frosch, D; Porzsolt, F; Heicappell, R; Kleinschmidt, K; Schatz, M; Weinknecht, S; Kaplan, RM (2001). "Comparison of German language versions of the QWB-SA and SF-36 evaluating outcomes for patients with prostate disease". Quality of Life Research. 10 (2): 165–73. doi:10.1023/a:1016771205405. PMID 11642687. S2CID 11838636.
- ^ Gao, L; Xia, L; Pan, SQ; Xiong, T; Li, SC (Sep 2013). "Validation of a Chinese version of the Quality of Well-Being Scale-Self-Administered (QWB-SA) in patients with epilepsy". Epilepsia. 54 (9): 1647–57. doi:10.1111/epi.12324. PMID 23875999.
- ^ Congost-Maestre, Nereida (2020-04-30). Sha, Mandy (ed.). Sociocultural issues in adapting Spanish health survey translation: The case of the QWB-SA (Chapter 10) in The Essential Role of Language in Survey Research. RTI Press. pp. 203–220. doi:10.3768/rtipress.bk.0023.2004. ISBN 978-1-934831-24-3.