Protection of Stocking Frames, etc. Act 1788
 | |
| Long title | An Act for the better and more effectual Protection of Stocking Frames and the Machines or Engines annexed thereto or used therewith and for the Punishment of Persons destroying or injuring of such Stocking Frames Machines or Engines and the Framework knitted Pieces Stockings and other Articles and Goods used and made in the Hosiery or Framework knitted Manufactory or breaking or destroying any Machinery contained in any Mill or Mills used or any way employed in preparing or spinning of Wool or Cotton for the use of the Stocking Frame. |
|---|---|
| Citation | 28 Geo. 3. c. 55 |
| Introduced by | D. P. Coke |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | 25 June 1788 |
| Repealed | 26 July 1889 |
| Other legislation | |
| Amended by | |
| Repealed by | Master and Servant Act 1889 |
Status: Repealed | |
The Protection of Stocking Frames, etc. Act 1788 (28 Geo. 3. c. 55) was an Act of Parliament passed by the British Government in 1788 and aimed at increasing the penalties for the deliberate disruption of the activity of mechanical knitting machines (stocking frames).[1]
Contents
[edit]Section one of the Act made failure to return frames that had been hired from their owner punishable with a fine, whilst section two made unlawfully disposing of hired frames punishable with imprisonment, and section three made the purchaser equally culpable if he or she knew the frames were not the property of the seller.[2][3] The final (and most strongly worded) section of the Act, section four, made the outright destruction of the frames a felony punishable by 7 to 14 years transportation.[1][2] The Act also included the same penalty for entering by force with the intent to destroy frames or their associated paraphernalia.[2] It was established in later case law that theft of items integral to the correct functioning of the machines (even if they were not damaged) was sufficient to meet the threshold for the Act.[4]
The Act described itself as a response to the malicious theft of frames, and the propensity for "discontents ... and other disorderly persons [to] have assembled in a riotous and tumultuous manner and have destroyed or materially damaged great numbers of stocking frames".[5] Daniel Coke, Member of Parliament for Nottingham, spoke on behalf of the bill in the Commons, citing disturbances in the town and pointing to previous legislation aimed at similar disruption in the wool trade. Coke originally proposed that machine-breaking carry the death penalty,[6] but was later forced to abandon this, seeing the request "overwhelmingly rejected" by Parliament.[1] The Act was eventually passed and received royal assent on 25 June 1788.[7]
Significance
[edit]Later Acts, such as the Destruction of Stocking Frames, etc. Act 1812, temporarily allowed judges to administer the death penalty for the crime of damaging frames,[1] citing the "ineffectual" nature of the lesser punishments set out in section four of the 1788 Act.[8] Section four of the 1788 Act was officially repealed by the Capital Punishments, etc. Act 1823 (4 Geo. 4. c. 46),[9] which, whilst not removing the possibility of transportation, gave judges additional room to sentence offenders to alternative punishments such as imprisonment.[10]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Karly Walters (2004). "Law, "Terror", and the Frame-Breaking Act". CiteSeerX 10.1.1.127.1833.
- ^ a b c Thomas Walter Williams (1816). A compendious and comprehensive law dictionary: elucidating the terms, and general principles of law and equity. Gale and Fenner. pp. 423–. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ The Standard library cyclopaedia of political, constitutional, statistical and forensic knowledge: Forming a work of universal reference on subjects of civil administration, political economy, finance, commerce, laws and social relations. H.G. Bohn. 1853. p. 215. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ Richard Burn; Joseph Chitty; Thomas Chitty (1831). The justice of the peace and parish officer. S. Sweet & A. Maxwell. p. 727. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ Great Britain; William David Evans; Anthony Hammond; Thomas Colpitts Granger (1836). A collection of statutes connected with the general administration of the law: arranged according to the order of subjects. W. H. Bond. pp. 264–265. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ William Cobbett (1816). Cobbett's parliamentary history of England: from the Norman conquest, in 1066 to the year 1803. Comprising the period from the fourteenth of February 1788, to the fourth of May 1789. Bagshaw. pp. 215–216. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ Great Britain House of Lords (1787). Journals of the House of Lords. HMSO. pp. 247–. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ "Transcription of the Destruction of Stocking Frames, etc. Act 1812" (PDF). Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ VOL. L TABLES AND INDEXES. 1854. p. 522. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
- ^ William Hawkins; John Curwood (1824). A treatise of the pleas of the crown or a system of the principal matters relating to that subject, digested under proper heads: in two volumes. Of criminal offences. Sweet. pp. 337–338. Retrieved 21 February 2012.