Pressure-retarded osmosis

The ideal water potential between fresh water (right) and sea water (left) corresponds to a hydraulic head of 270 metres

Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) is a technique to separate a solvent (for example, fresh water) from a solution that is more concentrated (e.g. sea water) and also pressurized. A semipermeable membrane allows the solvent to pass to the concentrated solution side by osmosis. The technique can be used to generate power from the salinity gradient energy resulting from the difference in the salt concentration between sea and river water.

History

This method of generating power was invented by Prof. Sidney Loeb in 1973 at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel.

Richard Norman submitted a manuscript describing the concept to Science in May 1974. In that manuscript, Norman clearly indicated that he was unaware of any prior work on the topic. Loeb submitted a comment on Norman's cost analysis to Science in January 1975. In that publication, Loeb proposed the term "pressure retarded osmosis". He further wrote "To facilitate examination of the concept in some detail, the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation awarded a grant (No. 337) to our Research Authority in May 1974."

Scientific and technical background

The ideal power production formula, which applies to an idealized situation, predicts that the optimal hydraulic pressure difference, $\Delta P$ is one-half the osmotic pressure difference between the saline and pure water streams $\Delta \Pi /2$. For a seawater to fresh water PRO system, the ideal case corresponds to an optimal power pressure of 26 bars. This pressure is equivalent to a column of water (hydraulic head) 270 meters high.

In a real-world system, both the hydraulic pressure and the osmotic pressure will vary through the PRO system as a result of friction, water removal, and salt build up near the membranes. These factors reduce the achievable power below the ideal limit. The amount of membrane area that can be used is limited by cost and other practical considerations, and this factor limits achievable power production. A significant portion of the electrical power generated by PRO must be used by the pumps that circulate water through the plant. Appropriate membranes are also necessary. All these factors have limited the economic viability of PRO.

PRO has the potential to extract osmotic power from waste streams, such as desalination plant brine discharge or treated wastewater effluent. The potential power output is proportional to the salinity difference between the fresh and saline water streams. Desalination yields very salty brine, while treated municipal wastewater has relatively little salt. Combining those streams could produce energy to power both facilities. However, powering an existing wastewater treatment plant by mixing treated wastewater with seawater in a mid-size city could require a membrane area of 2.5 million square meters.

Process

A pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) diagram. The applied pressure must be below the osmotic pressure for the process to work. Pipe thicknesses qualitatively convey the relative volumetric flow rate. Image modified by author from

PRO uses a water–permeable membrane with an osmotic pressure difference to drive water flux from a low–concentration "diluate" stream, into a slightly pressurized higher–concentration. An energy recovery device on this stream provides the energy output, and must exceed the pumping pressure input for net power production.

Testing

The world's first osmotic plant with capacity of 10 kW was opened by Statkraft, a state-owned hydropower company, on 24 November 2009 in Tofte, Norway. It had been estimated that PRO could generate 12 TWh annually in Norway, sufficient to meet 10% of Norway's total demand for electricity.

In January 2014, Statkraft terminated their pressure-retarded osmosis pilot project due to economic feasibility concerns.

Starting in 2021, SaltPower is building another commercial osmotic power plant in Denmark using very high salinity brine from a geothermal power plant.

See also

• Electrodialysis reversal (EDR)
• Forward osmosis
• Green energy
• Osmotic power
• Osmotic pressure
• Renewable energy
• Reverse electrodialysis (RED)
• Reverse osmosis
• Semipermeable membrane
• Van 't Hoff factor

Further reading

• Norman R. S. (1974). "Water Salination: A Source of Energy". Science. 186 (4161): 350–2. Bibcode:1974Sci...186..350N. doi:10.1126/science.186.4161.350. PMID 17839865. S2CID 8550368.
• Loeb S.; Norman R. S. (1975). "Osmotic Power Plants". Science. 189 (4203): 654–655. Bibcode:1975Sci...189..654L. doi:10.1126/science.189.4203.654. PMID 17838753.
• Loeb S. (1988). "Comments on the suitability of reverse osmosis membranes for energy recover by submarine osmotic power plants Desalination (Review)". Journal of Membrane Science. 68: 75–76. doi:10.1016/0011-9164(88)80044-4.
• Loeb S. (1998). "Energy Production at the Dead Sea by Pressure-Retarded Osmosis: Challenge or Chimera?". Desalination. 120 (3): 247–262. Bibcode:1998Desal.120..247L. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00222-7.
• Loeb S. (2002). "Large-scale power production by pressure-retarded osmosis, using river water and sea water passing through spiral modules desalination (Review)". Journal of Membrane Science. 143 (2): 115–122. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00233-3.
• Cath T. Y.; Childress A. E.; Elimelech M. (2006). "Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments (Review)". Journal of Membrane Science. 281 (1–2): 70–87. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048.
• Achilli A.; Cath T. Y.; Childress A. E. (2009). "Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: an experimental and theoretical investigation". Journal of Membrane Science. 343 (1–2): 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.006.