Portal talk:Western Sahara/Western Sahara lists

Untitled

Why? Why would you include a link to a disambiguation page that includes in irrelevant list as well as the relevant one instead of linking directly to the relevant one? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 15:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quite simply because there is such link and is redirecting to the cities in Western Sahara. It is better than including two categories "cities in Western Sahara" for those who would like to see them separated from Morocco, and "cities in Morocco" for those who see them as Moroccan cities. It is a question of neutrality.--A Jalil 16:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? By your reasoning, we should have a link to List of all cities, in case someone wants to see cities in Comoros as well. Why should we have a link to a disambiguation page instead of the relevant page itself? The list of cities in Morocco is irrelevant, as they are in Morocco, not Western Sahara. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 16:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you see Morocco irrelevant to Western Sahara, that is your opinion. In the facts and in reality they are very related. " ... they are in Morocco, not Western Sahara.". In the opinion of many former Polisario leaders, they are in Morocco. So a medium line is to be found and that is what my edit simply does.--A Jalil 17:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring me? Why did you ignore my question? A list of cities in Morocco belongs in the Moroccan portal. Should we put the List of cities in Algeria because Algeria is associated with the conflict? Of course not. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 17:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]