Portal talk:Space exploration

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Subportal Space exploration

The wording of the introduction was chosen to place this subportal underneath the Portal:Technology. However it also does fall under the Portal:Space as a clear subtopic of it. I think we should resolve this overlap in a way that shows this portal as placed within both areas. However, if in doubt its main focus is still technology and that placement should not confuse the reader on this. Any comments? Awolf002 11:52, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

There is significant overlap between this portal and Portal:Spaceflight.. the articles Space exploration and Spaceflight have just recently been separated, and after an attempt to merge the categories Category:Space exploration and Category:Spaceflight, they have stayed separate. So I'm not sure which of the two portals would be more appropriate as a subportal of Technology? Mlm42 11:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Spaceflight means what, exactly? It says it is about spacecrafts. If yes, then Portal:Spaceflight seems to seek to cover a subsection of the total area of technology applied in the "use" of space. As I said above, the space exploration title is meant to signal the coverage of all this technology, including related technologies (eg radiation hard micro chips) and their inventors and usages. I think, this approach is valid. However, we need to flesh this out some more to clearly identify what separates the two portals... Awolf002 12:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

To quote Wolfkeeper in the discussion to merge Space exploration and Spaceflight, he says "Spaceflight is a general article about mechanical and technical aspects of astrodynamics, spacecraft propulsion, spacecraft, launch pads, spaceports, reentry, countdown, attitude control systems, guidance, life support and so forth. This is based on the dictionary definition of spaceflight: "the flying of manned or unmanned spacecraft into or in outer space" In other words it's about transportation. Space exploration is a general article about exploring the solar system and other stellar systems, the effects of zero gravity on humans and other life, the effects of solar and cosmic radiation. In other words it's about exploration."

I don't think we can say Spaceflight is a subset of Space exploration - anymore.. communications satellites, for example, have nothing to do with the exploration of space. maybe someday Spaceflight will become as common as Portal:Aviation. So Space exploration would be when missions push the boundaries, and do it for the science, and knowledge. With this view, one may consider Space exploration as a subset of Spaceflight. Mlm42 12:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Alright, point taken. So maybe I was thinking of the wrong term, and this Portal should be called Space technology? If that is still not separate enough from the concept Spaceflight, we should actually discuss if/how to merge the two portals... Awolf002 02:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Ooh, i see.. that's a pretty good name for a Category, actually.. Space technology would include Spaceflight, then; perhaps renaming Portal:Spaceflight to Portal:Space technology, and expanding it appropriately, would be better. Mlm42 07:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

So, you're saying you want to merge the two portals? Or keep both Space technology and Space exploration (after renaming)? I still favor the idea of keeping them separate. Awolf002 11:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

i'm in favour of keeping them separate; Space technology (which would be Spaceflight renamed) and Space exploration. Mlm42 11:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Actually.. maybe it's best to rename this one to Space technology, and include anything that would be under Space exploration in Spaceflight. Mlm42 16:50, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, this move may be easier. As long as Spaceflight is a good term for Space exploration. It sounds to me a little bit like "manned space missions"... Awolf002 17:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

do you mean Spaceflight implies "manned"? hmm.. probably the same with Space travel, right? i think we need to decide what these terms mean to most people before we continue.. Mlm42 20:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Right. Yes, we need a discussion (and maybe a straw poll) by a larger group of people, with many "native speakers" (which I am not :). Awolf002 00:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm trying to figure out where I stand on this discussion (having just come across it), and frankly I'm so confused that I can't come up with an opinion, except that these categories seem to be getting way too complicated. If we can't figure out what is a subset of what, and what implies manned versus unmanned, how do we expect Wikipedia readers to be able to? MLilburne 12:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Hear, hear! There was an failed effort to merge all contents into a single portal (Portal:Space), but there was no interest by the community in this discussion. We need a way out of this confusion without merging just by renaming, I guess. Awolf002 12:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry that I missed the merger discussion... maybe next time. Anyhow, I will think about the renaming idea. There must be a simple solution in here somewhere. MLilburne 12:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Biography

I like the new addition of a "Astronaut of the week," however I would think we should change the headline. This portal focuses on technology and a biography of Robert H. Goddard must be in scope, too. How about just changing it to "Biography of the week"? Secondly, do we have enough biographies to cover a new article per week? Maybe per month will work better? Awolf002 11:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

I will by bold and change it... Awolf002 11:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

If Portal:Spaceflight gets changed to Portal:Space technology, then perhaps there would be a better place for those kind of biographies, and here we could only have astronauts. Mlm42 11:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't see why there's any category that implies only astronauts, except perhaps "space explorers", and even that would be debatable. MLilburne 12:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Tabs for this portal?

I have created a mockup for a "tabbed" version of this portal to cut down on the amount of scrolling when looking for certain topics. It looks half-way decent and so I like to hear suggestions and oppinions on how this may become the way this portal is organized. Cheers! Awolf002 18:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I just added a "tabbed version" of this portal, accessible via a link at the top of the page. Please, comment or improve at will! Awolf002 22:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Portal peer review

Space exploration

I would like to get input on any useful expansion to the various sections in this portal, as well as comments on whether to use a single page or the proposed "tabbed" page approach. This portal does not have many contributors, so good ideas are very welcome! Awolf002 01:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I have went through and found an few issues.

• The lead needs to be longer and should sum up the entire portal.
• The picture of the week needs image credits below the picture.
• In article of the month the subject of the article should be a bold link to the articles page not just bold.
• Biography of the week has the same problem as the article and needs a bold link.
• Since you don't have rotating content you seem to have a permanent hole on the bottom left hand side I would recommend moving something from the right over.
• Most of the links to your Associated Wikimedia don't go anywhere the either need to be corrected or removed.
• You don't seem to have a topics section, that is definitely something I recommend you add.
• The categories section needs some expansion.

These are just some initial thoughts I'll read through and let you know of anything else.— WilsBadKarma ^(Talk) 04:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for these great recommendations! I will work on these, today. Awolf002 12:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, here's a few more:

• Definite intro expansion.
• The footers in rotated content boxes should be the same. Example, "Read More" in article box, not in any other.
• I would recommend having less news stories(4-5), with a short summary instead of just a link. Although what you have now should work, just personal preference.
• Did you know should be shortened to the last 4-5, and add an archive.
• Categories should be expanded.
• No topics box at all.
• Use <div style="text-align:center; margin:-7px; padding-bottom:12px;">{{purge|'''Show new selections'''}} above rotated content.

As for tabbed pages, I would recommend only if you can fill such pages. Actually I think you could. Do like things you can do, and wikiprojects on one. Maybe can have News and did you know on another. I think theres enough for tabs, but you don't have em, if you do the main page right. Joe I 20:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Jo! I was on a bit of a break in the last weeks. Now is the time to put all these great suggestion into the TODO list and work on them. You all are a great help! Awolf002 02:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Joining forces with Portal:Spaceflight

I wonder if it makes sense for the maintainers of this portal to join forces with Portal:Spaceflight? The two are similar in scope.... (sdsds - talk) 20:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Other portal/category ideas

• Space Industrialization
• Space Settlement

Lazyquasar 03:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Revisiting merger proposals

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Please see Portal talk:Spaceflight#Revisiting merger proposals. I have proposed that this portal is merged into Portal:Spaceflight. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 00:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Notice from the Portals WikiProject

WikiProject Portals is back!

The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.

As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.

There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals. So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.

Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.

And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.

From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   07:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)