This page is part of WikiProject Current events, an attempt to expand and better organize information in articles related to current events. If you would like to participate in the project, visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.Current eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Current eventsTemplate:WikiProject Current eventsCurrent events articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Request to remove headline regarding battle of baghuz fawqani. This battle is in a ping pong mode with offensive stopping and starting every other day, an IP adress has added it in todays events as if there was a change in the battle but there isn't. The IP has edit warred, causing the article to be locked. Now his edit is stuck there. Can somebody remove it. It is really pointless and stuck there forever now. Jim7049 (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Jim7049 (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That WP:WRONGVERSION thing doesn't make sense. So what it says is if an article got locked because of an edit warred it should stay in the form it is when it got locked? What if it was something illogical like it currently is, should it stay that way since there was an edit war? Jim7049 (talk) 00:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jim7049 - You need to understand that making repeated back-and-forth reverts to an article or page is edit warring and disruptive, and is a violation of policy no matter how "correct" that you believe your changes are, or how "correct" you believe that you are. If it's a content-related dispute, then there's no deviation or exception when it comes to Wikipedia's policies and the expectation that edits are within their compliance; all editors must follow Wikipedia's dispute resolution protocol and discuss the issue between them and come to a consensus or agreement. Edit warring is not acceptable.
When I go to apply full protection to an article and due to disputes and edit warring, the revision and the article's content is completely irrelevant to me and I put no basis into "choosing the right revision" first when doing so. Whatever revision is published at the time I apply the protection is essentially the "luck of the draw". Unless there's a serious policy violation which warrants me to remove and fix it immediately (such as a BLP violation or violation of copyright), I don't care about whose revision is currently published while the article is protected. It's up to you to change what's currently published by discussing the dispute and coming up with the solution that everyone can agree upon.
I hope my response has provided some clarity and helped to answer your questions regarding WP:WRONGVERSION. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to message me on my user talk page and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. Keep youself outta trouble; work things out with the other editors, don't engage in any more edit warring behavior, and collaborate with the other editors in a respectful and positive manner. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)14:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not doneEdit requests to fully protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial... as this is under discussion it is not uncontroversial. — xaosfluxTalk00:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done 
Done, thanks. ansh666 19:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)