This page is part of WikiProject Current events, an attempt to expand and better organize information in articles related to current events. If you would like to participate in the project, visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.Current eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Current eventsTemplate:WikiProject Current eventsCurrent events articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
I removed this [1] as I don't believe it belongs. This isn't the signpost and the story is likely of limited interest outside wikipedia. Indeed the headline itself was misleading and provocative. The article doesn't mention anything about the recent local elections, which occurred long after the resignation/multiple accounts was discovered and the person didn't apparently take part in the recent local elections (or if he did, it doesn't appear to have had any effect). The only reason this story is of any interest is because it involves a member of the arbcom but while of great interest to wikipedians perhaps, it's of far less interest to everyone else which may explain why it only got in to the news 2 weeks+ later. To put it a different way, were it not for the fact that this concerns wikipedia and editors on wikipedia are naturally edited in wikipedia, few people would have noticed it considered putting it on Nil Einne (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
