Jump to content

Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service
Decided May 18, 2023
Full case namePolselli v. Internal Revenue Service
Docket no.21-1599
Citations598 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
When the Internal Revenue Service issues a summons in aid of collecting a tax liability, the exception to the notice requirement in 26 U.S.C. § 7609(c)(2)(D)(i) applies even if the delinquent taxpayer has no legal interest in the accounts or records summoned.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
MajorityRoberts, joined by unanimous

Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when the Internal Revenue Service issues a summons in aid of collecting a tax liability, the exception to the notice requirement in 26 U.S.C. § 7609(c)(2)(D)(i) applies even if the delinquent taxpayer has no legal interest in the accounts or records summoned.[1][2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 21-1599, 598 U.S. ___ (2023)
  2. ^ "Justices rule IRS can summon bank information without notifying account holders under appropriate circumstances". SCOTUSblog. 2023-05-19. Retrieved 2024-10-24.
[edit]
  • Text of Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service, No. 21-1599, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)