Oxford University (UK Parliament constituency)
Oxford University | |
---|---|
Former university constituency for the House of Commons | |
1603–1950 | |
Seats | 2 |
Oxford University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950. The last two members to represent Oxford University when it was abolished were A. P. Herbert and Arthur Salter.
Boundaries, electorate and electoral system
[edit]This university constituency was created by a Royal Charter of 1603. It was abolished in 1950 by the Representation of the People Act 1948.
The constituency was not a physical area. Its electorate consisted of the graduates of the University of Oxford. Before 1918 the franchise was restricted to male graduates with a Doctorate or MA degree. Namier and Brooke estimated the number of electors as about 500 in the 1754–1790 period; by 1910, it had risen to 6,500. Following the reforms of 1918, the franchise encompassed all graduates who paid a fee of £1 to join the register. This included around 400 women who had passed examinations which would have entitled them to a degree if they were male.[1]
The constituency returned two Members of Parliament. From 1918, the MPs were elected by the single transferable vote method of proportional representation.
History
[edit]The university strongly supported the old Tory cause in the 18th century. The original party system endured long after it had become meaningless in almost every other constituency.
After the Hanoverian succession to the British throne the Whigs became dominant in the politics of Cambridge University, the other university represented in Parliament, by using a royal prerogative power to confer doctorates. That power did not exist at Oxford, so the major part of the university electorate remained Tory (and in the first half of the 18th century sometimes Jacobite) in sympathy.
The university also valued its independence from government. In a rare contested general election in 1768 the two candidates with administration ties were defeated.
In the 19th century the university continued to support the right, almost always returning Tory, Conservative or Liberal Unionist candidates. The only exception was William Ewart Gladstone, formerly "the rising hope of the stern unbending Tories". He first represented the university as a Peelite, supporting a former member for the constituency – the sometime Conservative Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel. Gladstone retained his seat as a Liberal, for a time after 1859. Following Gladstone's defeat, in 1865, subsequent Liberal candidates were rare and they were never successful in winning a seat.
Even after the introduction of proportional representation, in 1918, both members continued to be Conservatives until 1935. Independent members were elected in the last phase of university elections to Parliament, before the constituency was abolished in 1950.
Members of Parliament
[edit]Sir William Whitelock is named by Rayment as "Sir William Whitelocke" and by Sedgwick as "Sir William Whitlock".
The Roman numerals in brackets after the names of the two members called William Bromley (who were father and son) are included to distinguish them. It is not a method which would have been used by the men themselves.
- Constituency created (1603)
Parliament of England 1604–1707
[edit]As there were sometimes significant gaps between Parliaments held in this period, the dates of first assembly and dissolution are given. Where the name of the member has not yet been ascertained, the entry unknown is entered in the table.
Elected | Assembled | Dissolved | First Member | Second Member |
---|---|---|---|---|
1604 | 19 March 1604 | 9 February 1611 | Sir Thomas Crompton | Sir Daniel Donne or Dun[2] |
1614 | 5 April 1614 | 7 June 1614 | Sir John Bennet | |
1620 or 1621 | 16 January 1621 | 8 February 1622 | Sir Clement Edmondes | |
1623 or 1624 | 12 February 1624 | 27 March 1625 | Sir Isaac Wake | Sir George Calvert |
1625 | 17 May 1625 | 12 August 1625 | Sir Thomas Edmonds | Sir John Danvers |
1626 | 6 February 1626 | 15 June 1626 | Sir Thomas Edmonds[3] | |
1628 | 17 March 1628 | 10 March 1629 | Sir Henry Marten | |
1640 | 13 April 1640 | 5 May 1640 | Sir Francis Windebanke | Sir John Danvers[4] |
1640 | 3 November 1640 | 5 December 1648 | John Selden | Sir Thomas Roe |
6 December 1648 a | 20 April 1653 b | unknown | ||
1653 c | 4 July 1653 | 12 December 1653 | unrepresented in Barebones Parliament | |
1654 d | 3 September 1654 | 22 January 1655 | Dr John Owen | |
1656 e | 17 September 1656 | 4 February 1658 | Nathaniel Fiennes | |
1658 or 1659 | 27 January 1659 | 22 April 1659 | Matthew Hale | John Mylles |
N/A f | 7 May 1659 | 20 February 1660 | unknown | unknown |
21 February 1660 | 16 March 1660 | |||
12 April 1660 | 25 April 1660 | 29 December 1660 | Thomas Clayton | John Mylles |
1 April 1661 | 8 May 1661 | 24 January 1679 | Laurence Hyde | Sir Heneage Finch, Bt |
16 January 1674 | Thomas Thynne | |||
27 February 1679 | 6 March 1679 | 12 July 1679 | Heneage Finch | John Eddisbury |
19 August 1679 | 21 October 1680 | 18 January 1681 | Sir Leoline Jenkins | Charles Perrot |
1681 | 21 March 1681 | 28 March 1681 | ||
1685 | 19 May 1685 | 2 June 1687 | ||
23 November 1685 | George Clarke | |||
7 January 1689 | 22 January 1689 | 6 February 1690 | Heneage Finch | Sir Thomas Clargesg |
1690 | 20 March 1690 | 11 October 1695 | ||
21 October 1695 | 22 November 1695 | 6 July 1698 | Sir William Trumbull | |
23 July 1698 | 24 August 1698 | 19 December 1700 | Sir Christopher Musgrave, Bt | Sir William Glynne, Bt |
3 January 1701 | 6 February 1701 | 11 November 1701 | Heneage Finch | |
21 March 1701 | William Bromley (I) | |||
1701 | 30 December 1701 | 2 July 1702 | ||
1702 | 20 August 1702 | 5 April 1705 | ||
22 November 1703 | Sir William Whitelock | |||
1705 | 14 June 1705 | 1707 h |
Notes:-
- a Date of Pride's Purge, which converted the Long Parliament into the Rump Parliament.
- b Date when Oliver Cromwell dissolved the Rump Parliament by force.
- c Date when the members of the nominated or Barebones Parliament were selected. The university was not represented in this body.
- d Date when the members of the First Protectorate Parliament were elected. The university was represented by one member in this body.
- e Date when the members of the Second Protectorate Parliament were elected. The university was represented by one member in this body.
- f The Rump Parliament was recalled and subsequently Pride's Purge was reversed, allowing the full Long Parliament to meet until it agreed to dissolve itself.
- g Clarges died on 4 October 1695, so the seat was vacant at the dissolution of 11 October 1695.
- h The MPs of the last Parliament of England and 45 members co-opted from the former Parliament of Scotland, became the House of Commons of the 1st Parliament of Great Britain which assembled on 23 October 1707 (see below for the members in that Parliament).
Parliaments of Great Britain 1707–1800 and of the United Kingdom 1801–1950
[edit]- Constituency abolished (1950)
Notes:-
- 1 Bromley had represented the university since a by-election in March 1701. He was Speaker of the House of Commons 1710–1713.
- 2 Abbot was Speaker of the House of Commons 1802–1817.
- 3 Estcourt and Inglis are regarded as Conservative MPs from 1835, as this was the approximate date when the Tory Party became known as the Conservative Party.
- 4 Gladstone accepted office in a Liberal ministry in 1859, thus vacating the seat he had held (as a Peelite MP – more formally a Liberal Conservative). He was re-elected as a Liberal candidate.
- 5 Anson became a Conservative MP when the Liberal Unionists formally merged with the Conservatives in 1912.
- 6 Cecil joined the non-Coalition wing of his party at some point during the 1918–1922 Parliament.
Elections
[edit]
1710s – 1720s – 1730s – 1740s – 1750s – 1760s – 1770s – 1780s – 1790s – 1800s – 1810s – 1820s – 1830s – 1840s – 1850s – 1860s – 1870s – 1880s – 1890s – 1900s – 1910s – 1920s – 1930s – 1940s |
Elections in the 1710s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Whitelock | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | William Bromley (I) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Note (1715): Bromley had been Speaker of the House of Commons 1710-1713.
- Death of Whitelock
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | George Clarke | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1720s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Bromley (I) | 337 | 43.54 | N/A | |
Tory | George Clarke | 278 | 35.92 | N/A | |
Tory | William King | 159 | 20.54 | N/A | |
Turnout | 774 | N/A | N/A |
- Note (1722): Stooks Smith records the votes as Bromley 278, Clarke 213 and King 142.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Bromley (I) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | George Clarke | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1730s
[edit]- Death of Bromley
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Hyde | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Hyde | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | George Clarke | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Clarke
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Bromley (II) | 329 | 73.11 | N/A | |
Whig | Robert Trevor | 121 | 26.89 | N/A | |
Majority | 208 | 46.22 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 450 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Death of Bromley
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Edward Butler | 214 | 76.98 | N/A | |
Tory | Peregrine Palmer | 64 | 23.02 | N/A | |
Majority | 150 | 53.96 | +7.74 | ||
Turnout | 278 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1740s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Hyde | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Edward Butler | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Butler
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Peregrine Palmer | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Henry Hyde | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Peregrine Palmer | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1750s
[edit]- Summons to the House of Lords of Cornbury, by writ in acceleration for his father's subsidiary title of Lord Hyde
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Roger Newdigate | 184 | 48.81 | N/A | |
Tory | Robert Harley | 126 | 33.42 | N/A | |
Tory | Edward Turner | 67 | 17.77 | N/A | |
Majority | 58 | 15.38 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 377 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Note (1751): Stooks Smith records Turner's vote as 47.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Roger Newdigate | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Peregrine Palmer | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1760s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Roger Newdigate | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Peregrine Palmer | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Palmer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Walter Bagot | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Death of Bagot
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Dolben | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Roger Newdigate | 352 | 38.77 | N/A | |
Tory | Francis Page | 296 | 32.80 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | Charles Jenkinson | 198 | 21.81 | N/A | |
Nonpartisan | George Hay | 62 | 6.83 | N/A | |
Turnout | 908 (493 voted) | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1770s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Roger Newdigate | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Francis Page | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1780s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Dolben | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Francis Page | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Dolben | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Francis Page | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1790s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Dolben | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Francis Page | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Dolben | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Francis Page | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1800s
[edit]- Resignation of Page
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Scott | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Dolben | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | William Scott | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Scott | 651 | 48.95 | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Abbot | 404 | 30.38 | N/A | |
Tory | Richard Heber | 275 | 20.68 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,330 | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Scott | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Abbot | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1810s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Scott | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Abbot | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Creation of Abbot as the 1st Lord Colchester
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Robert Peel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Scott | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Robert Peel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections in the 1820s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William Scott | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Robert Peel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Creation of Scott as the 1st Lord Stowell
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Richard Heber | 612 | 54.11 | N/A | |
Tory | J. Nicholl | 519 | 45.89 | N/A | |
Majority | 93 | 8.22 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,131 | N/A | |||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Peel as Secretary of State for the Home Department
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Robert Peel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold |
- Resignation of Heber
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Robert Peel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Peel as Secretary of State for the Home Department
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Robert Peel | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold |
- Resignation of Peel
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Robert Inglis | 755 | 55.35 | N/A | |
Tory | Robert Peel | 609 | 44.65 | N/A | |
Majority | 146 | 10.70 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,354 | N/A | |||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
- Note (1829): Stooks Smith records that the polls were open for three days. Inglis was a candidate promoted by the Ultra-Tories in opposition to Catholic emancipation.
Elections in the 1830s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Robert Inglis | Unopposed | |||
Tory hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Robert Inglis | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,524 | ||||
Tory hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | |||
Tory | Robert Inglis | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,496 | ||||
Tory hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Robert Inglis | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,496 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Robert Inglis | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,496 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1840s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Grimston Estcourt | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Robert Inglis | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 2,496 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Note (1841): McCalmont classifies Inglis as a Peelite candidate, at this election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Inglis | 1,700 | 48.3 | N/A | |
Peelite | William Ewart Gladstone | 997 | 28.3 | New | |
Conservative | Charles Gray Round | 824 | 23.4 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,851 | 56.1 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 3,300 | ||||
Majority | 703 | 20.0 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 173 | 4.9 | N/A | ||
Peelite gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A |
- Note (1847): Poll 5 days. (Source for this note and the number of voters: Stooks Smith). McCalmont classifies Inglis as a Peelite and Gladstone as a Liberal Conservative candidate, at this election.
Elections in the 1850s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Robert Inglis | 1,369 | 42.3 | −6.0 | |
Peelite | William Ewart Gladstone | 1,108 | 34.3 | +6.0 | |
Conservative | Robert Bullock Marsham[8] | 758 | 23.4 | — | |
Turnout | 1,618 (est) | 46.6 (est) | −9.5 | ||
Registered electors | 3,474 | ||||
Majority | 261 | 8.0 | −12.0 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | −6.0 | |||
Majority | 350 | 10.9 | +6.0 | ||
Peelite hold | Swing | +6.0 |
- Note (1852): Minimum possible turnout estimated by dividing votes by 2. To the extent that electors did not use both their votes, the figure will be an underestimate. McCalmont classifies Gladstone as a Liberal Conservative candidate, at this election.
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Gladstone as Chancellor of the Exchequer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peelite | William Ewart Gladstone | 1,022 | 53.2 | +18.9 | |
Conservative | Dudley Montagu Perceval[9] | 898 | 46.8 | −18.9 | |
Majority | 124 | 6.4 | −4.5 | ||
Turnout | 1,920 | 57.2 | +10.6 | ||
Registered electors | 3,357 | ||||
Peelite hold | Swing | +18.9 |
- Resignation of Inglis.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Heathcote | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peelite | William Ewart Gladstone | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | William Heathcote | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 3,538 | ||||
Peelite hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Gladstone as Lord High Commissioner to the Ionian Islands. McCalmont classifies Gladstone as a Liberal Conservative candidate, at this election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peelite | William Ewart Gladstone | Unopposed | |||
Peelite hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Ewart Gladstone | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | William Heathcote | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 3,623 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Gladstone as Chancellor of the Exchequer. McCalmont classifies Gladstone as a Liberal candidate, at this election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Ewart Gladstone | 1,050 | 55.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | Richard Temple-Grenville | 859 | 45.0 | N/A | |
Majority | 191 | 10.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,909 | 52.7 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 3,623 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1860s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Heathcote | 3,236 | 47.1 | N/A | |
Conservative | Gathorne Hardy | 1,904 | 27.7 | N/A | |
Liberal | William Ewart Gladstone | 1,724 | 25.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 180 | 2.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,432 (est) | 91.4 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 3,755 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
- Note (1865): Turnout estimated in the same way as for the 1852 election.
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Hardy as President of the Poor Law Board
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Gathorne Hardy | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Hardy as Secretary of State for the Home Department
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Gathorne Hardy | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Gathorne Hardy | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,190 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1870s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Gathorne Hardy | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 4,659 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Hardy as Secretary of State for War
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Gathorne Hardy | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
- Creation of Hardy as the 1st Viscount Cranbrook
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | 2,687 | 73.1 | N/A | |
Liberal | Henry John Stephen Smith[10] | 989 | 26.9 | New | |
Majority | 1,698 | 46.2 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,676 | 73.1 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 5,026 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1880s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 5,033 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1890s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Mowbray | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Death of Mowbray
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | William Anson | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Elections in the 1900s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist | William Anson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist | William Anson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold | |||||
Liberal Unionist hold |
Elections in the 1910s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | William Anson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Hugh Cecil | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal Unionist | William Anson | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Hugh Cecil | Unopposed | |||
Liberal Unionist hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
- Anson became a Conservative MP in 1912 when the Liberal Unionist Party formally merged with the Conservative Party.
- Death of Anson
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Rowland Prothero | Unopposed | |||
Unionist hold |
- Electorate expanded and elections using the bloc vote replaced by those using the single transferable vote, by the Representation of the People Act 1918, from the 1918 United Kingdom general election.
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
C | Unionist | Hugh Cecil | 49.80 | 2,771 | |
C | Unionist | Rowland Prothero | 30.84 | 1,716 | 2,546 |
Liberal | Gilbert Murray | 13.34 | 742 | 812 | |
Labour | Henry Sanderson Furniss | 6.02 | 335 | 351 | |
Electorate: 7,907 Valid: 5,564 Quota: 1,855 Turnout: 70.37% | |||||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
- Creation of Prothero as 1st Lord Ernle
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Charles Oman | 2,613 | 52.52 | −28.08 |
Liberal | Gilbert Murray | 1,330 | 26.73 | +13.39 | |
Independent | J. A. L. Riley | 1,032 | 20.74 | New | |
Majority | 1,283 | 25.79 | −41.47 | ||
Turnout | 4,975 | 62.92 | −7.35 | ||
Registered electors | 7,907 | ||||
Unionist hold | Swing | ||||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Elections in the 1920s
[edit]Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
Unionist | Hugh Cecil | 56.40 | 3,185 | ||
Unionist | Charles Oman | 18.03 | 1,018 | 2,170 | |
Liberal | Gilbert Murray | 25.57 | 1,444 | 1,594 | |
Electorate: 9,374 Valid: 5,647 Quota: 1,883 Turnout: 60.24% |
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
Unionist | Hugh Cecil | 43.77 | 3,560 | ||
Unionist | Charles Oman | 27.12 | 2,206 | 2,950 | |
Liberal | Gilbert Murray | 29.11 | 2,368 | 2,472 | |
Electorate: 10,814 Valid: 8,134 Quota: 2,712 Turnout: 75.22% |
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
Unionist | Hugh Cecil | 49.65 | 4,320 | ||
Unionist | Charles Oman | 19.97 | 1,738 | 2,968 | |
Liberal | Gilbert Murray | 30.38 | 2,643 | 2,832 | |
Electorate: 10,773 Valid: 8,701 Quota: 2,901 Turnout: 80.77% |
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||||
Unionist | Hugh Cecil | 52.45 | 6,012 | ||
Unionist | Charles Oman | 18.97 | 2,174 | 4,112 | |
Liberal | Gilbert Murray | 28.59 | 3,277 | 3,529 | |
Electorate: 15,770 Valid: 11,463 Quota: 3,822 Turnout: 72.69% |
Elections in the 1930s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hugh Cecil | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Charles Oman | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | FPv% | Count | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Conservative | Hugh Cecil | 48.32 | 7,365 | |||
Independent | A. P. Herbert | 22.24 | 3,390 | 3,864 | 5,206 | |
Conservative | C. R. M. F. Cruttwell | 11.83 | 1,803 | 3,520 | 3,697 | |
Labour | J. L. Stocks | 17.60 | 2,683 | 2,776 | eliminated | |
Electorate: 22,413 Valid: 15,241 Quota: 5,081 Turnout: 68.00 |
- Resignation of Cecil
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent | Arthur Salter | 7,580 | 50.18 | New | |
Conservative | Farquhar Buzzard | 3,917 | 25.93 | N/A | |
Ind. Conservative | Frederick Lindemann | 3,608 | 23.89 | New | |
Majority | 3,663 | 24.25 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 15,105 | 62.68 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 24,021 | ||||
Independent gain from Conservative | Swing |
Elections in the 1940s
[edit]Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent | Arthur Salter | 6,771 | 44.19 | N/A | |
Independent | A. P. Herbert | 5,136 | 33.52 | +11.28 | |
Labour | G. D. H. Cole | 3,414 | 22.28 | +4.68 | |
Majority | 1,722 | 5.23 | |||
Turnout | 15,321 | 53.08 | −14.92 | ||
Registered electors | 28,865 | ||||
Quota | 5,108 | ||||
Independent hold | Swing | ||||
Independent hold | Swing |
- As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
- Constituency abolished (1950)
References
[edit]- ^ "The Universities and Labour", Manchester Guardian, 6 December 1918
- ^ Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
- ^ J. Palmer, A Biographical History of England (1824), 86.
- ^ s:Danvers, John (DNB00)
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Stooks Smith, Henry (1845). The Parliaments of England, from 1st George I., to the Present Time. Vol II: Oxfordshire to Wales Inclusive. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co. pp. 7–9.
- ^ a b Fisher, David R. "Oxford University". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 9 May 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- ^ "Oxford". Berkshire Chronicle. 17 July 1852. p. 4. Retrieved 14 September 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Mr. Dudley Perceval". Morning Chronicle. 29 January 1853. p. 3. Retrieved 14 September 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Representation of Oxford University". Bury and Norwich Post. 14 May 1878. p. 8. Retrieved 14 January 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ a b c d e f g Craig, FWS, ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885-1918. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 9781349022984.
Bibliography
[edit]- Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885–1972, compiled and edited by F. W. S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885, compiled and edited by F. W. S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1977)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1885–1918, compiled and edited by F. W. S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1918–1949, compiled and edited by F. W. S. Craig (Macmillan Press, revised edition 1977)
- McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book: British Election Results 1832–1918 (8th edition, The Harvester Press 1971)
- The House of Commons 1715–1754, by Romney Sedgwick (HMSO 1970)
- The House of Commons 1754–1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844–50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F. W. S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973))
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832–1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume II 1886–1918, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1978)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume III 1919–1945, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1979)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume IV 1945–1979, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1981)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "O"