Jump to content

Organogermanium compounds in cross-coupling reactions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Organogermanium compounds in cross-coupling reactions refers to a type of cross-coupling reaction where one of the coupling partners is an organogermanium compound. Usually these reactions are catalyzed by transition metal complexes.

History

[edit]

The first example of organogermanes used in transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction was reported in 2004.[1] However, due to the toxicity, low reactivity (compared with other Ar–[M] nucleophiles) and poor stability of ArGeCl3, this reaction was demonstrated not to be synthetically applicable.

First example of organogermanes used in transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions

After that, various organogermanes were designed to increase their robustness and decrease their toxicity. However, most of them are not trivial to synthesize and have the least reactivity in Pd(0)/Pd(II) catalytic system. As a result, these organogermanes have limited utilization in organic synthesis.[citation needed]

Organogermanes used in transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions

A stoichiometric study by Schoenebeck[2] confirmed that ArGeEt3 are inert species in the transmetallation step with Pd(II) complex. DFT calculation indicated that the conventional concerted transmetallation mechanism has an extremely high energy barrier and not viable under the reaction conditions. Instead, electrophilic aromatic substitution (SEAr)-type pathway is kinetically more favored to activate C–Ge bonds.

Based on this concept, if the transition metal catalyst is electron-deficient or electrophilic enough, the activation of C–Ge bond can be achievable via SEAr mechanism. And due to this unique reactivity, the transformations of organogermanes can exhibit excellent chemoselectivity and tolerate other reactive functional groups, which can provide a platform to functionalize different groups orthogonally.

Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions

[edit]

Highly electrophilic cationic Pd nanoparticle can activate the C–Ge bond of ArGeEt3. The Pd nanoparticle is exclusively reactive towards organogermanes with aryl iodides (ArI) or aryl iodonium salts (Ar2I+) as electrophilic coupling partners. Other cross-coupling-reactive functional groups, such as other (psudo)halides, aryl boronic esters, stayed intact during the reaction. In comparison, under traditional Pd(0)-catalyzed cross-coupling conditions, ArGeEt3 are inert while aryl boronic acids/esters are reactive. Besides, ArGeEt3 bearing electron-deficient aryl groups, whose aryl boronic acid analogues are highly unstable, have excellent stability instead, allowing the use of them as nucleophiles in cross-coupling reactions.[2]

Pd-nanoparticle-catalyzed cross-coupling

Pd(TFA)2 is another reactive catalyst for transmetallation of ArGeEt3. It has an electron-deficient Pd center and provides thermodynamic driving force by forming TFA–GeEt3. Based on this strategy, an oxidative C–O cross-coupling method catalyzed by Pd(TFA)2 was reported. The reaction proceeded through a Pd(II)/Pd(IV) catalytic cycle. Similarly, other reactive functional groups for cross-coupling such as (pseudo)halides and boronic esters are well tolerated.[3]

Pd-catalyzed C–O coupling of organogermanes

Au-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions

[edit]

In addition to Pd nanoparticle and Pd(TFA)2, other electron-deficient transition-metal complexes, such as Au(III) or cationic Au(I) complexes, are reactive for C–Ge bond activation to give aryl gold (Ar–Au) as transmetallation intermediate. Merging this reactivity with C(aryl)–H activation or photo-induced oxidative addition of ArN2BF4 with gold catalysts, C(aryl)–H functionalization[4][5] or C(aryl)–C(aryl) cross-coupling[6] can be realized via Au(I)/Au(III) catalytic cycle. Under the employed conditions, ArGeEt3 are more reactive compared with its aryl silane or boronic ester analogues. Additionally, gold complexes are unreactive with oxidative addition with (pseudo)halides. In conclusion, these reactions also showed great orthogonal reactivity with different reactive functional groups.

Au-catalyzed cross-coupling of organogermanes

Au-catalyzed C(aryl)–C(alkynyl) cross-coupling was reported with alkynyl germanes as nucleophiles and ArN2BF4 as coupling partners under photoirradiation condition. Not surprisingly, this method showed orthogonality against Sonogashira Coupling.[7]

Au-catalyzed Sonogashira coupling of organogermanes

Organogermanes in transition-metal-free reactions

[edit]

Ipso halogenation

[edit]

ArGeEt3 can react with electrophilic halogen sources without transition-metal catalysts to give ipso halogenation product under mild conditions.[8] For the bromination (with NBS) and iodination (with NIS), the reaction is highly chemoselective, with halogenation solely taking place at C–Ge in presence of electron-rich arene, heterocycle substrates or other reactive functional groups. The mechanistic study supports a concerted SEAr-type pathway.

Ipso halogenation of organogermanes

Aryl germanes are stable against selectfluor. The electrophilic fluorination will selectively place at the –Bu3Sn site in presence of –GeEt3. Other Ar–M species, such as aryl boronic acids/esters and silanes, cannot stay intact under this condition.

Chemoselective fluorination of organotin

Based on its unique reactivity, organogermanes can be viewed as masked halides in organic synthesis, which enables the modular synthesis of polyarenes.[9]

Modular synthesis of polyarenes

Giese-type reaction

[edit]

C–Ge bonds of alkyl germanes can be homolyzed by photoirradiation, generating alkyl radical, which can be captured by electron-deficient alkenes.[10] This Giese-type reaction has excellent orthogonal selectivity. Reactive functional groups such as halides, boronic esters can be well tolerated.

Giese-type alkylation with organogermanes

Miscellaneous Reactivity

[edit]

The nucleophilicity increases Si < Ge < Sn as well as the hyperconjugation effect known as the β-silicon effect Si < Ge << Sn. The Si–C bond is mainly covalent and the Sn–C relatively polar, bonds with germanium are in between.[11]

Relative nucleophilicity

Reactivity of M-ene reaction: Si < Ge < Sn < Pb. From Si to Pb, an increasing π-σ* conjugation between the C=C double bond and the C–M bond will enhance the reactivity. It is also likely that there is some interaction between the nucleophilic end of the enophile and the metal in the reaction intermediate which lowers the energy of the transition state.[12]

Relative reactivity in ene-reaction

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Enokido, Tatsuki; Fugami, Keigo; Endo, Mayuko; Kameyama, Masayuki; Kosugi, Masanori (2004). "Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reaction by Means of Organogermanium Trichlorides". Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis. 346 (13–15): 1685–1688. doi:10.1002/adsc.200404187.
  2. ^ a b Fricke, Christoph; Sherborne, Grant J.; Funes‐Ardoiz, Ignacio; Senol, Erdem; Guven, Sinem; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2019-12-02). "Orthogonal Nanoparticle Catalysis with Organogermanes". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 58 (49): 17788–17795. doi:10.1002/anie.201910060. ISSN 1433-7851. PMC 6899604. PMID 31562670.
  3. ^ Dahiya, Amit; Gevondian, Avetik G.; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2023-04-12). "Orthogonal C–O Bond Construction with Organogermanes". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 145 (14): 7729–7735. doi:10.1021/jacs.3c01081. ISSN 0002-7863. PMID 36994920. S2CID 257836345.
  4. ^ Dahiya, Amit; Fricke, Christoph; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2020-04-29). "Gold-Catalyzed Chemoselective Couplings of Polyfluoroarenes with Aryl Germanes and Downstream Diversification". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 142 (17): 7754–7759. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c02860. ISSN 0002-7863. PMID 32249568. S2CID 214808814.
  5. ^ Fricke, Christoph; Dahiya, Amit; Reid, William B.; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2019-10-04). "Gold-Catalyzed C–H Functionalization with Aryl Germanes". ACS Catalysis. 9 (10): 9231–9236. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b02841. ISSN 2155-5435. PMC 6781487. PMID 31608162.
  6. ^ Sherborne, Grant J.; Gevondian, Avetik G.; Funes‐Ardoiz, Ignacio; Dahiya, Amit; Fricke, Christoph; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2020). "Modular and Selective Arylation of Aryl Germanes (C−GeEt 3 ) over C−Bpin, C−SiR 3 and Halogens Enabled by Light‐Activated Gold Catalysis". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 59 (36): 15543–15548. doi:10.1002/anie.202005066. ISSN 1433-7851. PMC 7496160. PMID 32392397.
  7. ^ Dahiya, Amit; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2022-07-01). "Orthogonal and Modular Arylation of Alkynylgermanes". ACS Catalysis. 12 (13): 8048–8054. doi:10.1021/acscatal.2c02179. ISSN 2155-5435. S2CID 249968186.
  8. ^ Fricke, Christoph; Deckers, Kristina; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2020-10-12). "Orthogonal Stability and Reactivity of Aryl Germanes Enables Rapid and Selective (Multi)Halogenations". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 59 (42): 18717–18722. doi:10.1002/anie.202008372. ISSN 1433-7851. PMC 7590071. PMID 32656881.
  9. ^ Kreisel, Tatjana; Mendel, Marvin; Queen, Adele E.; Deckers, Kristina; Hupperich, Daniel; Riegger, Julian; Fricke, Christoph; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2022-05-09). "Modular Generation of (Iodinated) Polyarenes Using Triethylgermane as Orthogonal Masking Group". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 61 (20): e202201475. doi:10.1002/anie.202201475. ISSN 1433-7851. PMC 9314983. PMID 35263493.
  10. ^ Selmani, Aymane; Schoetz, Markus D.; Queen, Adele E.; Schoenebeck, Franziska (2022-05-06). "Modularity in the C sp3 Space─Alkyl Germanes as Orthogonal Molecular Handles for Chemoselective Diversification". ACS Catalysis. 12 (9): 4833–4839. doi:10.1021/acscatal.2c00852. ISSN 2155-5435. S2CID 248060934.
  11. ^ Hagen, Gisela; Mayr, Herbert (1991). "Kinetics of the reactions of allylsilanes, allylgermanes, and allylstannanes with carbenium ions". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 113 (13): 4954–4961. doi:10.1021/ja00013a035. ISSN 0002-7863.
  12. ^ Cai, Jiaqiang; Davies, Alwyn G. (1992). "Ene reactions of allylic derivatives of silicon, germanium, tin and lead with N-phenyltriazolinedione: the effect of varying the metal". Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2 (10): 1743–1746. doi:10.1039/p29920001743. ISSN 0300-9580.