Jump to content

Oberfohren Memorandum

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933

Allegedly authored in spring 1933 by German national-conservative politician Ernst Oberfohren, the Oberfohren Memorandum advocated that the Reichstag fire of February 27, 1933, had been planned by Hermann Göring and Joseph Goebbels and carried out by a group of Nazi officers. Although rejected as a fabrication by the Nazis, its origins remained mainly unclear until the end of World War II. From 1959 to 1962 author Fritz Tobias published his research in Der Spiegel magazine and in his work The Reichstag Fire: Legend and Truth, asserting that the document was a forgery, produced and circulated in 1933 by German Communist journalist émigrés in France.[1][2]

Overview

[edit]
Willi Münzenberg

The memorandum was named after Ernst Oberfohren, chairman of the German National People's Party (German: Deutschnationale Volkspartei, DNVP) faction in the Reichstag. The DNVP was an alliance of nationalists, reactionary monarchists and antisemites supported by the Pan-German League, that constituted the largest and most powerful national-conservative party in Germany during the Weimar Republic until the rise and exclusive rule of the Nazi Party in July 1933.[3][4]

By the end of March 1933 copies of the memorandum were already circulated in secret. An English journalist forwarded a copy to the United Kingdom. The Manchester Guardian published an article on 26th April 1933 that suggested the Reichstag fire had been a Nazi plot. The authors claimed their information was based on a memorandum they had received from a prominent conservative politician of Germany. The article asserted that the Government immediadetely attributed the fire to the Communists. At once false evidence was manufactured, ″thereby not inculpating but rather exculpating the Communists and deepening the suspicion felt by all objective observers that the real incendiaries were to be found within the Cabinet itself. Before the tribunal of history it is not the Communists, not the wretched van der Lubbe (the alleged perpetrator, who Hitler had threatened to execute before his guilt had been proven, even before he had been tried), but the German Government that is arraigned.″[5][6]

The paper was denounced as a fake by the Nazis. Oberfohren, who had already resigned from office in late March, was found shot dead in his appartement on May 7, 1933. Then reported as a suicide, national and international observers alike assumed that the Nazis forced Oberfohren to commit suicide.[7]

In an attempt to convince the international media that the Nazi Party was responsible for the fire, the full text, authored by a group of Communist journalists around Arthur Koestler, Willi Munzenberg, Otto Katz and Erich Wollenberg and published in August 1933 in Munzenberg's Paris publishing house, appeared in the Brown Book of the KPD. Muenzenberg, who had still been in Berlin during the Reichstag fire night, immediately fled to Paris, was granted political asylum in France and with Comintern financial support acquired the publishing house Editions du Carrefour. The group was also responsible for the forged confession given by SA officer Karl Ernst.[5][8][2][6]

According to the memorandum Ernst Oberfohren, in his capacity as chairman of the jointly governing German National People's Party had compiled irrefutable evidence, that identified the Nazis as the true instigators of the Reichstag arson. The argument regarding the fire was that it could not have been the work of a single person (Van der Lubbe) – but a group. ″The agents of Herr Göring, led by the Silesian SA leader, Reichstag-deputy Heines, entering the Reichstag through the heating-pipe passage coming from the palace of the President of the Reichstag, Hermann Göring. Every SA and SS leader was carefully selected and had a special station assigned to him. As soon as the outposts in the Reichstag signalled that the Communist deputies Torgler and Koenen had left the building, the SA troops set to work.″[5][9] According to the memorandum Linus van der Lubbe might have been gay and was probably affiliated with SA leader Ernst Röhm, widely known to be homosexual.[2][6]

Trial & anti-trial

[edit]

In July 1933, Marinus van der Lubbe, Ernst Torgler, Georgi Dimitrov, Blagoi Popov, and Vasil Tanev were indicted on charges of setting the Reichstag on fire and from 21 September to 23 December 1933, the Leipzig Trial, presided over by judges from the German Supreme Court (Reichsgericht) took place. Already dismissed as a fake, the memorandum was not taken note of.

Nonetheless, international media generally disagreed with the trial's verdict and a countertrial was held in London by a group of lawyers, democrats and other anti-Nazis under the aegis of German Communist émigrés. The chairman of the mock trial was British Labour Party barrister D. N. Pritt and the chief organiser was the KPD propaganda chief Willi Münzenberg. The other "judges" were Piet Vermeylen of Belgium; Georg Branting of Sweden; Vincent de Moro-Giafferi and Gaston Bergery of France; Betsy Bakker-Nort, a lawyer and member of parliament of the Netherlands for the progressive liberal party Free-thinking Democratic League; Vald Hvidt of Denmark; and Arthur Garfield Hays of the United States. It ended with the conclusion that the defendants were innocent and the true initiators of the fire were to be found amid the leading Nazi Party elite.[10]

After World War II

[edit]

In 1951 the Lower Saxony interior ministry ordered author Fritz Tobias to undertake research on the event. Tobias came to the conclusion that the memorandum was a product of Muenzenberg's Paris publishing house. His history remains widely accepted as it was hardly ever contested by contemporary historians, mainly because he enjoyed a considerable degree of constitutional support from his employer. However, internationally the responsibility for the Reichstag fire remains a topic of debate and research.[11][12][1][13][14][15]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Benjamin Carter Hett (June 2015). "'This Story Is about Something Fundamental': Nazi Criminals, History, Memory, and the Reichstag Fire". Central European History. 48 (2): 199–224. JSTOR 43965146.
  2. ^ a b c Jay Klinghoffer; Judith Apter Klinghoffer (2002). "Rallying to the Defense". International Citizens' Tribunals. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. pp. 19–30. doi:10.1057/9780312299163_3. ISBN 978-0-312-29916-3.
  3. ^ Hermann Beck (2008). The Fateful Alliance: German Conservatives and Nazis in 1933: the Machtergreifung in a New Light. Berghahn Books. pp. 227–. ISBN 978-1-84545-496-8.
  4. ^ William L. Shirer (11 October 2011). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4516-5168-3.
  5. ^ a b c John Simkin. "Oberfohren Memorandum". Spartacus Educational. Retrieved February 27, 2021.
  6. ^ a b c Fritz Tobias. "The Reichstag Fire - Appendix C - THE OBERFOHREN MEMORANDUM" (PDF). JR Books. Retrieved February 27, 2021.
  7. ^ Fran Baker (May 1, 2015). "The Curious Case of the Reichstag Fire: A Story from the Guardian Archive". University of Manchester Library. Retrieved February 27, 2021.
  8. ^ World Committee for the Victims of German Fascism. "The brown book of the Hitler terror and the burning of the Reichstag". HathiTrust. Retrieved February 27, 2021.
  9. ^ Matt Robinson (August 30, 2020). "Who Was Really Responsible For The Reichstag Fire?". Berlin Experiences. Retrieved February 27, 2021.
  10. ^ Connolly, Kate (12 January 2008). "75 years on, executed Reichstag arsonist finally wins pardon". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 1 May 2008.
  11. ^ "The Reichstag Fire". Holocaust Encyclopedia. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Archived from the original on 31 July 2018. Retrieved 12 August 2013.
  12. ^ "75 Years Ago, Reichstag Fire Sped Hitler's Power Grab". Deutsche Welle. 27 February 2008. Archived from the original on 5 May 2015. Retrieved 12 August 2013.
  13. ^ Paterson, Tony (April 15, 2001). "Historians find 'proof' that Nazis burnt Reichstag". The Sunday Telegraph. Archived from the original on 9 March 2018. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
  14. ^ Shirer, William (2011). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. Simon and Schuster. p. 192. There is enough evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the Nazis who planned the arson and carried it out for their own political ends.
  15. ^ John Mage, Michael E. Tigar (March 1, 2009). "The Reichstag Fire Trial, 1933-2008: The Production of Law and History". Monthly Review Foundation. Retrieved February 27, 2021.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Kershaw, Ian (1998). Hitler, 1889–1936: Hubris. London: Allen Lane.
  • Tobias, Fritz (1964). The Reichstag Fire. New York: Putnam.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oberfohren_Memorandum&oldid=1256561402"