Jump to content

Epidendrum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Nanodes)

Epidendrum
E. nocturnum
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Monocots
Order: Asparagales
Family: Orchidaceae
Subfamily: Epidendroideae
Tribe: Epidendreae
Subtribe: Laeliinae
Genus: Epidendrum
L., 1763
Type species
Epidendrum nocturnum
Jacq., 1760
Species

About 1,100 species—see List of Epidendrum species

Epidendrum /ˌɛpɪˈdɛndrəm/,[1] abbreviated Epi in the horticultural trade,[2] is a large neotropical genus of the orchid family. With more than 1,500 species,[3] some authors describe it as a mega-genus. The genus name (from Greek επί, epi and δένδρον, dendron, "upon trees") refers to its epiphytic growth habit.

When Carl Linnaeus named this genus in 1763, he included in this genus all the epiphytic orchids known to him. Although few of these orchids are still included in the genus Epidendrum, some species of Epidendrum are nevertheless not epiphytic.

Distribution and ecology

[edit]

They are native to the tropics and subtropical regions of the American continents, from North Carolina to Argentina. Their habitat can be epiphytic, terrestrial (such as E. fulgens), or even lithophytic (growing on bare rock, such as E. calanthum and E. saxatile). Many are grown in the Andes, at altitudes between 1,000 and 3,000 m. Their habitats include humid jungles, dry tropical forests, sunny grassy slopes, cool cloud forests, and sandy barrier islands.

Members of this genus can be very aggressive colonisers of disturbed habitat, and many species which were once rare in this genus have become more common as the result of human activities. For example, some of these plants can be found in greater abundance growing terrestrially along road cuts throughout their native ranges as the result of road construction.[4][5]

Many of these species are relatively easy to grow in rich humus compost with some sand. The plants resemble Dendrobiums in form and habit typically, although they tend to be terrestrial rather than lithophytic and epiphytic, and do better in a humus rich, well aerated substrate.[4][5]

Most of the high altitude members of this genus from cloud forests defy cultivation outside their habitat, and it is reported that even moving a plant from one location to another on the same host tree in habitat will result in the death of the plant, possibly due to dependency on a specific mycorrhizal fungal symbiont.[4][5]

Characteristics

[edit]

They are quite varied in flower size and appearance. They grow in tufts, in racemose inflorescences, sometimes in corymbs or panicles. The apical, lateral or basal flowers are mostly small to medium in size and frequently are not marked by a conspicuous display. The inflorescences are frequently dense. Many species are fragrant. The flowers may be produced only once, or during several years from the same or new inflorescences. The ellipsoid fruits are 3-ribbed capsules.

This genus has the following characteristics:

  • a slit rostellum (small extension or little beak to the median stigma lobe), producing a transparent or white thick and adhesive liquid.
  • the sometimes fringed lip is adnate to ( = united with) the column (forming a nectary tube (but rarely producing nectar), continuing through the pedicel). The genus Prosthechea was split off because the lip is not completely adnate to the apex of the column.
  • the pollinarium contains four pollinia, sometimes two and rarely eight pollinia, and then four very reduced.
  • the erect, pendent, or creeping stems are reed-like, simple or branching, or may be pseudobulbs or thickened stems. (The genus Coilostylis, recently split off from Epidendrum, has pseudobulbs, is an artificial genus and does not stand up to molecular analysis.)

Synonymy

[edit]
Epidendrum radicans in the wild.
Epidendrum sp. in the wild.

Initially, European taxonomists applied the generic epithet Epidendrum to all newly discovered epiphytic orchids. Gradually, many of these "Epidendrums" were recognized as being quite diverse and deserving of different generic epithets—many belong to different tribes or subtribes (e.g. Vanda). To add to the confusion, however, many descriptions of closely related species were published with different generic epithets.

As if the confusion caused by these publications were not great enough, many closely related genera (or perhaps subgenera, sections, or subsections) have been recognized and published. According to the modern rules of taxonomy, each new proposed genus that is split off from Epidendrum must bear the name of the oldest generic epithet published for a member of the new genus. Hence, many genera which have been brought into synonymy with Epidendrum have later been segregated out again. Because most of these decisions rest on the informed opinions of authorities, the segregated taxa are often then re-published as synonyms. Hence, some of the following information may seem a bit contradictory, especially if the assertion that two names are "synonyms" is misconstrued as an assertion that the two names mean exactly the same thing.

The following genera have been brought into synonymy with Epidendrum:

Genera which have been erected (or resurrected) from Epidendrum include the following examples:

  • Anacheilium (Lindl.) Withner & P.A.Harding (2004). This genus contains more than 50 species, reclassified from Prosthechea, Encyclia, and Epidendrum.
  • Barkeria
  • Dimerandra
  • Caularthron
  • Encyclia This is another "mega-genus" differing from Epidendrum in that the plants are mostly pseudobulbous, and in that the lip "encircles" the column, rather than being adnate. Like Epidendrum, genera have been and are likely to continue to be split off from this genus.
  • Euchile (Dressler & G.E. Pollard) C.L. Withner (1998) was elevated from a section of Encyclia with two species.
  • Hormidium Lindl. ex Heynh, described by Brieger as having the lip adnate to the proximal part of the column. Brieger placed more than 100 species in this genus. (Lindley was unsure if this was a genus, subgenus, or section.) Withner and Harding recently transferred two more species into this genus: one from Epidendrum and one from Encyclia.
  • Microepidendrum Brieger ex W.E.Higgins (2002)
  • Nanodes
  • Oerstedella Rchb.f.
  • Oestlundia W.E.Higgins (2002)
  • Panarica Withner & P.A.Harding (2004) contains six species, some from Prosthechea and some from Epidendrum
  • Pollardia Withner & P.A.Harding (2004) contains seventeen species, some from Prosthechea and some from Epidendrum.
  • Prosthechea This debatable genus contains the "cockleshell orchids", with lips which are adnate to the column only about halfway to the apex, and which "encircle" the end of the column. Most of the species of this genus were long classified in Encyclia. Some species of this genus have been placed in Anacheilium (Lindl.) Withner & P.A.Harding (2004) and Panarica Withner & P.A.Harding (2004).
  • Pseudencyclia Chiron & V.P.Castro (2003)
  • Psychilis

Subgenera

[edit]

Species

[edit]
See List of Epidendrum species for a full list

Epidendrum sensu lato is a huge genus, embracing more than 2,000 binomials (about 1,100 accepted names and the rest have become synonyms of other species). More than 1,000 have been split off into new or resurrected genera. However, it is estimated that there are more than 2,000 Epidendrum orchids, many of which still have to be discovered. More than 400 new species have lately been described by Eric Hágsater and colleagues (see: Reference).

Several botanists have been honored with an Epidendrum orchid named after them, including the following:

Hybrids

[edit]

Only a few natural hybrids within the genus have been named as species, such as Epidendrum × doroteae, Epidendrum × gransabanense and Epidendrum × purpureum.

Epidendrum orchids hybridize readily with members of other related genera, such as Cattleya (× Epicattleya is the accepted nothogenus for such a hybrid) Brassavola (producing a × Brassoepidendrum). There are also multi-generic hybrids, for example, × Vaughnara is the nothogenus for hybrids containing ancestor species from each of the genera Brassavola, Cattleya, and Epidendrum, but no others.

Hybridization is thought to have a strong influence in diversification of this genus sometimes compromising the genetic integrity of the parental species.[6][7]

Culture

[edit]

The flowers of many Epidendrum species are small, but some such as E. ibaguense are showy, and many are widely cultivated, such as E. cinnabarinum, E. ibaguense, E. nocturnum, E. radicans, E. secundum, and a multitude of hybrids of these species.

Most Epidendrum species require cool or intermediate to warm conditions for culture, and the commonly cultivated species, such as E. radicans grow in typically cool conditions. Some, such as E. conopseum (syn. E. magnoliae) can even tolerate extended freezing conditions. In Auckland and other sub-tropical regions of New Zealand, the cool growing plants will flower all year round. While they are normally grown in pots, it is also possible to grow them in a bark garden or on a tree, although the plants prefer a humus rich well-aerated media.[5]

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Sunset Western Garden Book, 1995:606–607
  2. ^ "My Huge List of Orchid Abbreviations". 2014-06-13.
  3. ^ "WCSP". World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Retrieved 2015-08-28.
  4. ^ a b c The Orchids, Natural History and Classification, Robert L. Dressler. ISBN 0-674-87526-5
  5. ^ a b c d Illustrated Encyclopedia of Orchids ISBN 0-88192-267-6
  6. ^ Marques, Isabel; Draper, David; Riofrío, Lorena; Naranjo, Carlos (2014-02-04). "Multiple hybridization events, polyploidy and low postmating isolation entangle the evolution of neotropical species of Epidendrum (Orchidaceae)". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 14 (1): 20. Bibcode:2014BMCEE..14...20M. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-20. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 3927766. PMID 24495351.
  7. ^ Vega, Yesenia; Marques, Isabel; Castro, Sílvia; Loureiro, João (2013-11-05). "Outcomes of Extensive Hybridization and Introgression in Epidendrum (Orchidaceae): Can We Rely on Species Boundaries?". PLOS ONE. 8 (11): e80662. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...880662V. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080662. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3818259. PMID 24224057.
  • Brieger, F. C. and Hunt, P. F. "HORMIDIUM, MAXILLARIA AND SCAPHYGLOTTIS (ORCH.)", Taxon 18(5) pp. 601–603 (Oct. 1969)
  • Hagsater, E., and Soto, M. 2005. Epidendrum In Pridgeon, A. M., Cribb, P. J., Chase, M. W., and Rasmussen, F. N., (eds.) Genera Orchidacearum 4: Epidendroideae (Part One). Oxford University Press, pp. 236–251.
  • Hagsater, E, and Sánchez S., L. 2006. The Genus Epidendrum, Part 5, Species New &O ld in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidacearum 8: pl. 801-900.
  • Hagsater, E., and Sánchez S., L. 2007. The Genus Epidendrum, Part 6, Species New and Old in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidacearum 9: pl. 901-1000.
  • Hagsater, E., and Sánchez S., L. 2008. The Genus Epidendrum, Part 7, Species New and Old in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidacearum 11: pl. 1101-1200.
  • Hagsater, E., and Sánchez S., L. 2009. The Genus Epidendrum Part 8, Species New & Old in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidacearum 12: pl. 1201-1300.
  • Hagsater E., and Sánchez S., L. 2010. The Genus Epidendrum, Part 9, Species New and Old in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidacearum 13: pl.1301-1400.
  • Hagsater, E., and Sánchez S., L., 2013. The Genus Epidendrum, Part 10, Species New and Old in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidacearum 14: pl. 1401-1500.
  • Hagsater, E., and Sánchez S., L., 2015. The Eenus Epidendrum, Part 11, Species New and Old in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidccearum 5(1): pl. 1501-1568.
  • Hagsater, E., and Sánchez S., L. 2016. The Genus Epidendrum, Part 11, Species New and Old in Epidendrum, Icones Orchidacearum 15(2): pl. 1569-1600.
  • Hagsater, E., Sanchez Saldana, L., and Garcia Cruz, J. (eds.) 1999. Icones Orchidacearum: fascicle 3. The genus Epidendrum: part 2. "A second century of new species in Epidendrum". Herbario AMO, Mexico D.F.
  • Hagsater, E., Santiago Ayala, S., and Rodríguez-Martínez, L. 2016. Epidendrum lasiostachyum (Orchidaceae):A New Colombian Species of The Epidendrum Macrostschyum Group. Lankesteriana 16(1): 27-37
  • Hagsater, E. 2001. Icones Orchidacearum: Fascicle 4. The Genus Epidendrum. Part 3, "A Third Century of New Species in Epidendrum". Asociacion Mexicana de Orquideologia A.C., Mexico, D.F.
  • Hágsater, E. 2004. The genus Epidendrum. Part 4. A fourth century of new species in Epidendrum. Icon. Orchid. 7: pl. 701-800.
  • Withner, C. A., Cattleyas and Their Relatives. Brassavola, Encyclia, and Other Genera of Mexico and Central America (5) Timber Press, 1998
  • Withner, C. A. and Harding, P. A., Cattleyas and Their Relatives. The Debatable Epidendrums Timber Press 2004.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Epidendrum&oldid=1237316528"