Nakba Law
Nakba Law | |
---|---|
Knesset | |
Enacted | 2011 |
"Fundamentals of Finance – Amendment No. 40", sometimes referred to as the Nakba Law, is a 2011 Israeli law which received criticism for limiting freedom of speech pertaining to the founding of Israel and the Nakba. The law affects organizations which are funded, in whole or in part, by the government.[1]
The law authorizes the Minister of Finance to withhold a limited amount of state funds from any government-funded[1] institution or body that commemorates "Israel's Independence Day or the day on which the state was established as a day of mourning", or that denies the existence of Israel as a "Jewish and democratic state."
The amount of state funds withheld is related to the amount of money spent on the event, capped at three times the amount of money spent.[1]
Background
[edit]The law was first proposed in 2008 by Alex Miller from the nationalistic party Yisrael Beiteinu,[2] and preliminarily approved by the Ministerial Committee for Legislation on May 24, 2009.[2] The proposal was rejected and sent to the Committee for Constitution, Law, and Justice for revision, where the proposed fine of ten times of the cost of the event was reduced to three times of the amount at the suggestion of David Rotem (Yisrael Beiteinu). [3]
Thirty-seven members of the Knesset voted in favor of the law, and twenty-five voted against at the third reading of the Law. 58 out of 120 MKs did not show up for the vote, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.[4][5]
Provisions
[edit]The law affects organizations which are funded, in whole or in part, by the Israeli government.[1]
It declares that the Minister of Finance is authorized to withhold transfer of state funds, if the primary goal of the funds spent was to do one of the following:
- Denying the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and Democratic State[1]
- Incitement of racism, violence, or terrorism[1]
- Supporting armed conflict or acts of terror, of an enemy state or a terror organization, against the State of Israel[1]
- Referring to the Israeli Independence Day or the founding day of the country as a day of mourning[1]
- An act of vandalism or physical debasement of the flag or symbols of the state[1]
Effects
[edit]The decision of the law was criticised by the human rights organisation Human Rights Watch[6] and the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank William La Rue[7] also by Israeli NGOs like the Israel Democracy Institute,[8] as an infringement of freedom of expression.
In 2019, Tel Aviv University cancelled a lecture by the politician Ofer Cassif, citing the law as the reason. This was the first instance of an academic institution heeding this law.[9]
Citations
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i Book of Laws - ספר החוקים (PDF) (in Hebrew). Vol. 2286 כ"ד באדר ב' התשע"א, 30.3.2011. Israel: Knesset (published 30 March 2011). 2011. pp. 686–687. ISSN 0334-3030. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 May 2023. This article incorporates a translation of text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ a b Gutman & Tirosh 2021, p. 713.
- ^ Hartman, Ben (2011-03-15). "'Nakba law' passes vote in Knesset committee". The Jerusalem Post.
- ^ Gutman & Tirosh 2021, p. 714.
- ^ Stoil, Rebecca Anna (2011-03-23). "'Nakba Bill' passes Knesset in third reading".
- ^ Israel: New Laws Marginalize Palestinian Arab Citizens, Human Rights Watch, 2011-03-30
- ^ Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue: Addendum, Mission to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory, UN Human Rights Council, 2012-06-11
- ^ Kremnitzer, Mordechai; Fuchs, Amir (2011-03-21). "The Nakba Bill: A Test of the Democratic Nature of the Jewish and Democratic State".
- ^ Kadari-Ovadia, Shira (May 16, 2019). "Israeli University Cancels Event Marking Nakba Day, Citing Violation of Law". Haaretz. Retrieved October 12, 2021.
Bibliography
[edit]- Gutman, Yifat (2016). "Memory Laws: An Escalation in Minority Exclusion or a Testimony to the Limits of State Power?". Law & Society Review. 50 (3): 575–607. doi:10.1111/lasr.12221.
- Gutman, Yifat; Tirosh, Noam (2021). "Balancing Atrocities and Forced Forgetting: Memory Laws as a Means of Social Control in Israel". Law & Social Inquiry. 46 (3). Cambridge University Press: 705–730. doi:10.1017/lsi.2020.35. S2CID 234091285. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
- Kapshuk, Yoav; Strömbom, Lisa (2021). "Israeli Pre-Transitional Justice and the Nakba Law". Israel Law Review. 54 (3). Cambridge University Press: 305–323. doi:10.1017/S0021223721000157. This article incorporates text from this source, which is available under the CC BY 4.0 license.