Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.

Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
	Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 23, 2022
Full case name	Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
Docket no.	21-328
Citations	596 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
	Federal courts may not adopt an arbitration-specific rule conditioning a waiver of the right to arbitrate on a showing of prejudice.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer; Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor; Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch; Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinion
Majority	Kagan, joined by unanimous

Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that federal courts may not adopt an arbitration-specific rule conditioning a waiver of the right to arbitrate on a showing of prejudice.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., No. 21-328, 596 U.S. ___ (2022).
^ "Courts may not "make up" new procedural rules to favor arbitration". SCOTUSblog. 2022-05-24. Retrieved 2024-10-31.

External links

Text of Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., No. 21-328, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[case-1] Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., No. 21-328, 596 U.S. ___ (2022).

[2] "Courts may not "make up" new procedural rules to favor arbitration". SCOTUSblog. 2022-05-24. Retrieved 2024-10-31.

[1]

[2]