Module talk:Sports table

Winning percentage four digits

Can an option be done for goal percentage with 4 digits, for example like the win percentage with notratio setting?

I need help if there is another notratio code for goal percentage please, anyone who can help me?

Example

Pos	Team	Pld	W	L	GF	GA	PP	PCT	Qualification
1	South East Melbourne Phoenix	8	6	2	686	636	107.9	75.00	Semi-Finals
2	Melbourne United	11	8	3	931	830	112.2	72.73
3	Perth Wildcats	10	7	3	880	809	108.8	70.00
4	Illawarra Hawks	11	6	5	962	966	99.6	54.55
5	Tasmania JackJumpers	11	5	6	834	837	99.6	45.45
6	Sydney Kings	12	5	7	959	987	97.2	41.67
7	Brisbane Bullets	10	4	6	844	880	95.9	40.00
8	Adelaide 36ers	10	4	6	805	854	94.3	40.00
9	Cairns Taipans	6	2	4	459	484	94.8	33.33
10	New Zealand Breakers	11	3	8	866	943	91.8	27.27

Updated to match(es) played on 4 February 2022. Source: NBL.com.au

Giacontigers (talk) 12:10, 6 February 2022 (AEDT)

How to indicate that two teams have tied in a Sports Table module.

On my current draft page, at User:Yoblyblob/1985 Niue Soccer Tournament, the two top teams in Division 1 officially tied for a joint championship. Does anyone know how to edit the number to show them both finishing in first? Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

@Yoblyblob I don't think you can, but you can use the status column to show that the title was shared (see Module:Sports table/WDL#Results and status). Otherwise I think you'd have to use a normal table and not this module. Nthep (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

|pos_XXX=1 Quri.inka (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

This is true. I'd forgotten about the |POS= parameter. Nthep (talk) 19:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 18 September 2024

Description of suggested change: Allow custom text inside splitN for tables like 2014 FIFA World Cup#Final standings.

Diff:

−

table.insert(t,'|- style="background-color:'..result_col['black1']..'; line-height:3pt;"\n') table.insert(t,string.rep('|',2*N_cols)..'\n')

+

if yesno(Args['split'..ii]) == nil then table.insert(t,'|-\n') table.insert(t,'|colspan='..(2*N_cols)..'|'..Args['split'..ii]..'\n') else table.insert(t,'|- style="background-color:'..result_col['black1']..'; line-height:3pt;"\n') table.insert(t,string.rep('|',2*N_cols)..'\n') end

SocietyBox (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

The {{{res_col_header}}} parameter allows grouping and has the benefit of positively identifying which rows the comment applies to. It's not always apparent which rows a heading like those in 2014 FIFA World Cup#Final standings applies to. MOS:COLHEAD actively discourages the use of inserted summary rows like this. Nthep (talk) 13:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Just the excuse I needed to rewrite that table. SocietyBox (talk) 23:59, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Help with a custom table

I've been trying to convert the wikitable at 2024 USL Cup#Ranking of non-group leading teams to use Module:Sports table, but have come across some issues. When using Module:Sports table/Custom, the following issues arise:

• Played column calculation: cannot add W+PKW+PKL+L
• Points column calculation: cannot assign 2 points for a PKW and 1 point for a PKL
• Points column formatting: cannot disable bolding

See the below code for an example.

Using Sports table/Custom

Pos	Team	Pld	W	PKW	PKL	L	GF	GA	GD	Pts	Qualification
1	Union Omaha	5	3	2	1	2	16	13	+3	9	Advanced to knockout stage
2	Lexington SC	5	3	2	1	2	10	10	0	9
3	Greenville Triumph SC	6	3	1	1	3	10	8	+2	9
4	Chattanooga Red Wolves SC	6	1	1	1	5	10	15	−5	3
5	Richmond Kickers	5	2	3	0	3	9	11	−2	6
6	Spokane Velocity FC	6	1	0	2	5	9	17	−8	3
7	One Knoxville SC	6	4	1	1	2	8	7	+1	12
8	Central Valley Fuego FC	4	1	1	3	3	8	10	−2	3
9	South Georgia Tormenta FC	4	0	2	2	4	8	13	−5	0

Updated to match(es) played on unknown. Source:

Or, instead of using the Custom module, would it be easier to allow an option to modify WL PK/WDL OT to change which columns are and are not bolded? What would be the best solution? Pining Frietjes, who is very knowledgeable with this module. Thanks, S.A. Julio (talk) 18:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

S.A. Julio, yes, changing WL PK/WDL OT would probably be less complicated, with a lot less code in the article. looking at WDL OT. we may be able to trigger it through |ranking_style= without adding another parameter. I have to look. Frietjes (talk) 18:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

I added |ranking_style=forpts which bolds the goals for column. I could have it unbold the points column, but the looking at the logic for |ranking_style= in the other cases, I would expect it to bold both. to selectively turn on and off bolding, we should have a different parameter for clarity. but, in this case, the ranking is first by points scored, and second by points, so it seems okay to have both bolded. Frietjes (talk) 19:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

@Frietjes: Ok, great thank you! I will note that for this article, only head-to-head points is a tiebreaker. Therefore, the points column doesn't really need to be emphasized, but it's not a big deal if it requires too many changes for another parameter. S.A. Julio (talk) 20:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Totals check

@Frietjes: One other quick question: often this module will be used to show how teams rank from different groups, for example: UEFA Euro 2016#Ranking of third-placed teams. However, then the totals check will give a number of warnings when previewing an edit that the wins/losses, goals for/against, etc. do not total each other. Is there any way the totals check feature could be disabled when groups are present? Would be really appreciated if possible! Thanks, S.A. Julio (talk) 20:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@S.A. Julio try adding |notracking=yes to the table. Nthep (talk) 21:07, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@Nthep: The only issue is that there are hundreds of such tables, having a simpler way of disabling the totals check would be nice. I would say almost all tables with the 'group' column do not need a total check. S.A. Julio (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

The test to display total checks could be set to depend on either of the |show_groups= or |notracking= parameters without too much difficulty (I think). But there would need to be a way to allow total checks to be shown, if wanted, on tables with groups so the logic would need to allow that.

There's probably more investigation needed into how many tables there are that use groups and how many of those don't need total checks. Nthep (talk) 21:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)