Jump to content

Mexico City Blues

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mexico City Blues
First edition
AuthorJack Kerouac
Cover artistRoy Kuhlman
LanguageEnglish
PublisherGrove Press
Publication date
1959
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (hardback and paperback)
OCLC20993609
Preceded byPull My Daisy 
Followed byThe Scripture of the Golden Eternity 

Mexico City Blues is a long poem by Jack Kerouac, composed of 242 "choruses" or stanzas, which was first published in 1959. Written between 1954 and 1957, the poem is the product of Kerouac's spontaneous prose technique, his Buddhist faith, emotional states, and disappointment with his own creativity—including his failure to publish a novel between 1950's The Town and the City and the more widely acclaimed On the Road (1957).[1]

Writing and publication

[edit]

Kerouac began writing the stanzas, or "choruses", that became Mexico City Blues while living in Mexico City with Bill Garver, a friend of William S. Burroughs. Largely written under the influence of cannabis and morphine, the choruses were defined only by the size of Kerouac's notebook page. The poem incorporates multiple textual sources, including direct quotations; three of the choruses (52, 53 and 54) are transcriptions of conversations Kerouac had with Garver, while others variously include onomatopoeia and scenic transcriptions of sounds. The choruses often include references to real figures including Burroughs and Gregory Corso, as well as religious figures and themes.[2] After finishing Mexico City Blues, while still in Mexico City, Kerouac additionally wrote Tristessa.[3]

In October 1957, after Kerouac achieved fame with On the Road, he sent Mexico City Blues to City Lights Books in the hopes of publication in their Pocket Poets series.[4] In 1958, after the publication of The Dharma Bums, Kerouac's friend Allen Ginsberg tried to sell the book to Grove Press and New Directions Press;[5] it was eventually published by Grove in November 1959.[6]

Critical reception

[edit]

Rexroth review and contemporary reception

[edit]

Upon publication of Mexico City Blues, a review by the poet Kenneth Rexroth appeared in The New York Times. Rexroth mainly criticized Kerouac's perceived misunderstanding of Buddhism, referring to his portrayal of Buddha as "a dime-store incense burner", and sardonically concluded that he "always wondered what ever happened to those wax work figures in the old rubber-neck dives in Chinatown. Now we know; one of them at least writes books."[7] Ginsberg, in observations recorded in Barry Gifford and Lawrence Lee's oral history Jack's Book (1978), attributed Rexroth's "damning, terrible" review and his condemnation of the Beat phenomenon to Rexroth feeling vulnerable as a result of the perception that "he had now 'shown his true colors' by backing a group of unholy, barbarian, no-account, no-good people – Beatnik, unwashed, dirty, badmen of letters who didn't have anything on the ball. So he may have felt vulnerable that he originally had been so friendly, literarily, and had backed us up."[8]

In his monograph on the poem, literary critic James T. Jones describes Rexroth's review as "a model of unethical behavior in print" which, as his standard of a defamatory piece, "consigned one of Kerouac's richest works to temporary obscurity"; he additionally argued that it may have been written in retaliation for perceived poor manners on Kerouac's part, or as an indirect attack on the poet Robert Creeley, a friend of Kerouac's who had an affair with Rexroth's wife.[9] Creeley himself had published a more positive review in Poetry,[9] which described the poem as "a series of improvisations, notes, a shorthand of perceptions and memories, having in large part the same word-play and rhythmic invention to be found in [Kerouac's] prose."[10] The poet Gary Snyder, a friend of Kerouac's, described Mexico City Blues as "the greatest piece of religious poetry I've ever seen."[11] The poet Anthony Hecht reviewed Mexico City Blues in The Hudson Review, declaring that "the proper way to read this book ... is straight through at one sitting."[12] Hecht argued that Kerouac's professed aspiration to be a "jazz poet", amplified by his publishers, was an imposture, and that the book was in fact greater if understood as something much more "literary", resembling or drawing on the work of Ezra Pound, William Carlos Williams, Gertrude Stein, E. E. Cummings and James Joyce.[13] Hecht concluded that:

there is something valuable and beguiling behind the poetry which is as curiously difficult to get at as if the book were translated from another tongue ... But what seems to me to emerge at the end is a voice of remarkable kindness and gentleness, an engaging and modest good humor and a quite genuine spiritual simplicity...[14]

Later studies

[edit]

Jones has described Mexico City Blues as

definitive documentation of Kerouac's attempt to achieve both psychic and literary equilibrium. He endeavored to express in a complex, ritualized song as many symbols of his personal conflicts as he could effectively control by uniting them with traditional literary techniques. In this sense, Mexico City Blues is the most important book Kerouac ever wrote, and it sheds light on all his novels by providing a compendium of the issues that most concerned him as a writer, as well as a model for the transformation of conflict into an antiphonal language.[15]

In his book Jack Kerouac: Prophet of the New Romanticism (1976), Robert A. Hipkiss criticizes much of Kerouac's poetry, but identifies Mexico City Blues as probably containing Kerouac's best poetry, and praises the 235th Chorus in particular.[16] Hipkiss compares the 235th Chorus to Robert Frost's "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening", and interprets the chorus, which reads "How do I know that I'm dead / Because I'm alive / And I got work to do ...", as referring to obligations which give purpose to the narrator's life, but which are "painful and not satisfying". Unlike in Frost's poem, in Mexico City Blues "there is no satisfactory putting aside of the death wish by contemplating the 'miles to go before I sleep.'"[17] Hipkiss describes the poem as "an expression of the creative impulse very much for its own sake—a refusal of rules of creation and a celebration, in the act, of the spontaneity inherent in creativity."[18]

In other media

[edit]

When Bob Dylan and Allen Ginsberg visited Kerouac's hometown of Lowell, Massachusetts, as part of the Rolling Thunder Revue tour, they visited Kerouac's grave where Ginsberg recited stanzas from Mexico City Blues. Footage of the two men at the grave was featured in the film Renaldo and Clara (1978). Ginsberg later said that Dylan was already familiar with Mexico City Blues, having read it while living in St. Paul, Minnesota, in 1959.[19]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jones, James T. (2010) [1992]. A Map of Mexico City Blues: Jack Kerouac as Poet (Revised ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. p. 10. ISBN 978-0809385980.
  2. ^ McNally, Dennis (1979). Desolate Angel: Jack Kerouac, the Beat Generation, and America. New York: Random House. p. 195. ISBN 0394500113.
  3. ^ McNally 1979, p. 196.
  4. ^ McNally 1979, p. 243.
  5. ^ McNally 1979, p. 254.
  6. ^ McNally 1979, p. 274.
  7. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth (November 29, 1959). "Discordant and Cool". The New York Times.
  8. ^ Gifford, Barry; Lee, Lawrence (1999) [1978]. Jack's Book: An Oral Biography of Jack Kerouac. Edinburgh: Rebel Inc. ISBN 086241928X.
  9. ^ a b Jones 2010, p. 15.
  10. ^ Creeley, Robert (June 1961). "Ways of Looking". Poetry: 195.
  11. ^ McNally 1979, p. 208.
  12. ^ Hecht, Anthony (Winter 1959–1960). "The Anguish of the Spirit and the Letter". The Hudson Review. 12 (4): 601. doi:10.2307/3848843. JSTOR 3848843.
  13. ^ Hecht 1959–1960, p. 602.
  14. ^ Hecht 1959–1960, p. 603.
  15. ^ Jones 2010, p. 4.
  16. ^ Hipkiss, Robert A. (1976). Jack Kerouac: Prophet of the New Romanticism. Lawrence: The Regents Press of Kansas. p. 81. ISBN 0700601511.
  17. ^ Hipkiss 1976, p. 52.
  18. ^ Hipkiss 1976, p. 94.
  19. ^ Wilentz, Sean (August 15, 2010). "Bob Dylan, the Beat Generation, and Allen Ginsberg's America". The New Yorker.
[edit]