MediaWiki talk:Ipbreason-dropdown/sandbox
- Common block reasons
- Vandalism
- Vandalism-only account
- Spamming links to external sites
- Spam / advertising-only account
- Creating attack pages
- Creating nonsense pages
- Abusing multiple accounts
- Block or ban evasion
- Personal attacks or harassment
- Edit warring
- Disruptive editing
- Making legal threats
- Arbitration enforcement
- Repeatedly and deliberately triggering the Abuse filter
- Templated reasons
- {{anonblock}}
- {{schoolblock}}
- {{blocked proxy}}
- {{usernameblock}}
- {{spamusernameblock}}
- {{UsernameHardBlocked}}
- {{checkuserblock}}
- {{Tor}}
- {{Vaublock}}
Protected edit request on 6 May 2019
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Four issues should be addressed.
- Two of the templates should not be bulleted because bulleting them causes Multiline table in list lint errors: {{rangeblock}} and {{Tor}}.
- Many of the templates should not be bulleted because bullets causes part of the content to display outside the box.
- The user of this page needs to see the template name together with the template display.
- One of the templates is listed twice.
I have solved these four issues in User:Anomalocaris/sandbox/Lint Test. Please take the contents of that template as replacement markup for MediaWiki:Ipbreason-dropdown/sandbox. — Anomalocaris (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Not done for now: @Anomalocaris: Isn't this the same as MediaWiki_talk:Ipbreason-dropdown#Protected_edit_request_on_14_February_2018? That conversation still holds. This is a sandbox, so, okay, but the content you've created in your sandbox can't be used on the actual page so it's not helpful here. That being said, I think we can just blank the sandbox if it's causing linter headaches, since it was part of a redesign from four years ago and wasn't ever challenged or used since. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Amorymeltzer: Thank you for your attention to this. I had forgotten about my edit request on 14 February 2018 of another "template". If this design is no longer on the table, I would favor blanking the page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well, it's definitely "on the table" since it was what got used in the actual dropdown, but I'll blank it with a note here, especially since subpages aren't enabled here. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Well, it's definitely "on the table" since it was what got used in the actual dropdown, but I'll blank it with a note here, especially since subpages aren't enabled here. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- Amorymeltzer: Thank you for your attention to this. I had forgotten about my edit request on 14 February 2018 of another "template". If this design is no longer on the table, I would favor blanking the page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
