MediaWiki talk:Abusefilter-log-summary

Editprotected

{{editprotected}} I would like to propose an addition: "Note that one edit may trigger multiple filters." This would make the log more clear. Evil saltine (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Edokter • Talk • 22:53, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from LikeLakers2, 16:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please make a edit like this, so that it will bypass the redirect, and also use the correct name. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 16:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Not to bypass the redirect, but to replace "abuse filter" with "edit filter" to avoid biting newbies. Anomie ⚔ 01:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please replace: "False positives should be reported here."

By: "False positives should be reported at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives."

Reason: Mystery meat navigation. Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 10 April 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The link at the end of this message should link directly to WP:EFFPR so that patrollers looking at the edit filter log can easily have one-click access to the proper reports page, rather than having to manually type the shortcut into the search bar or click navigation to the transclusion page and then have to make two or three additional clicks to end up at the "proper" page. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]