McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Appearance
McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
---|---|
Decided April 3, 2017 | |
Full case name | McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Docket no. | 15-1248 |
Citations | 581 U.S. 72 (more) |
Holding | |
A district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan |
Concur/dissent | Ginsburg |
McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 581 U.S. 72 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a district court's decision whether to enforce or quash a subpoena issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission should be reviewed for abuse of discretion, not de novo.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of McLane Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, No. 15-1248, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)