Jump to content

Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Etched portrait from the editions of Boxhorn's works by Caspar Commelijn (1660ff.), after a portrait of c. 1640

Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn (August 28, 1612 – October 3, 1653) was a Dutch scholar (his Latinized name was Marcus Zuerius Boxhornius). Born in Bergen op Zoom, he was professor at the University of Leiden. He discovered the similarity among Indo-European languages, and supposed the existence of a primitive common language which he called 'Scythian'. He included in his hypothesis Dutch, Greek, Latin, Persian, and German, later adding Slavic, Celtic and Baltic languages. He excluded languages such as Hebrew from his hypothesis. He died in Leiden.

Indo-Scythian theory

[edit]

Boxhorn wrote numerous works, especially about the history of his homeland.

Marcus Zuërius van Boxhorn was one of the most important historical linguists. His Indo-Scythian theory laid the foundation for today's understanding of the Indo-European language family. In the 17th century he first investigated a possible genetic relationship mainly in European languages. In his opinion, languages such as Greek, Latin, Welsh, German, Russian, Celtic, Turkish, Latvian, Lithuanian and later also Persian had a common original language. Van Boxhorn first described his Indo-Scythian theory in 1637 in a letter to his friend Claudius Salmasius, who later added Sanskrit to van Boxhorn's theory. In 1647 van Boxhorn published his theory in three parts.

At that time, many people believed that Hebrew was the original human language. This assumption was mostly based on biblical sources. Two compatriots of van Boxhorn, Johannes Goropius Becanus[1] (1519–1572) and Adriaan van Schrieck[2] (1560–1621), however, were of the opinion that Dutch was the original language. Van Boxhorn rejected this theory and assumed a common original language of Latin, Greek, Germanic, Russian, Welsh, Latvian, Lithuanian, Turkish and Persian, which he named Scythian.[3] He did not believe that all languages are derived from a single language.

Van Boxhorn first publicly postulated his theory in a work about the goddess Nehalennia, whose statues and altars were discovered in January 1647 in the Dutch province of Zeeland. Van Boxhorn dealt with the origin of the name of Nehalennia, which had not yet been clarified. The first volume[4] of his work van Boxhorn wrote in the form of an open letter to the Countess Amalia of Solms-Braunfels, in the third volume he explained his so-called Indo-Scythian theory and presented evidence for it.[5]

The inspiration for van Boxhorn's theory was, among other things, the Lexicon Symphonum published in Basel in 1537 by the Bohemian humanist Sigismund Gelenius, who was born in Prague. Even before Boxhorn, the University of Leiden had studied the genetic relationship of languages and language groups. In 1575, Franciscus Raphelengius (Ravlenghien) (1539–1597), professor of Hebrew in Leiden, taught his students about the similarities between the Persian and the Germanic languages, which suggested a genetic relationship. This idea was later developed in Leiden by Bonaventura de Smet[6] and later Johann Elichmann.[7] In the library of his friend Petrus Scriverius, also known as Peter Schrijver, Boxhorn found the works of Rudolphus Agricola von Groningen, alias Roelof Huisman, Johannes Aventinus (Turmair) and Hadrianus Junius von Hoorn, alias Adriaen de Jonghe, who examined the relationship between Greek, Latin and Germanic.

A century after Boxhorn postulated his theory, the French scholar Gaston-Laurent Cœurdoux (1691–1779) found grammatical evidence that Sanskrit was related to Indo-Scythian, i.e. Indo-European languages.[8] In 1771 he found cognates of the verb "to be" in Sanskrit and Latin, which indicated a relationship. In Germany, van Boxhorn's theory was propagated in 1686 in the thesis of Swedish philologist Andreas Jäger at the University of Wittenberg.[9] In England the theory became known at the beginning of the 18th century and was spread by Lord Monboddo (James Burnet).[10] Inspired by these writings, Sir William Jones (1746–1794) also dealt with the Indo-European theory.[11] Because of his high standing with the British colonial government and his status in Asian society, he won recognition of the kinship of Sanskrit to Greek and Latin. Although Jones himself made no studies on this relationship, he mentioned the work of Lord Monboddo, from which he had learned of van Boxhorn's results.

Methodology

[edit]

To prove the common origin of languages, van Boxhorn compared etymologies, inflection patterns and grammars of Greek, Latin, Persian, Old Saxon, Dutch and German, Gothic, Russian, Danish, Swedish, Lithuanian, Czech, Croatian and Welsh. He found similarities that suggest a genetic relationship of these languages. Van Boxhorn was the first to include not only Greek, Germanic, Romance and Slavic languages in the language family, but also Persian, Sanskrit, Celtic and Baltic languages.

Marcus Zuërius van Boxhorn compared not only similar words in different languages, but whole inflection patterns and grammars. He was of the opinion that the relationship between languages must be verifiable on the basis of systematic grammatical correspondences and not only postulated on the basis of similar-looking word forms. He was the founder of the methodology for studying language that we now call the comparative method.

Van Boxhorn viewed language as an organic system and warned against loan words and Wanderworts, which spread as loanwords among languages and cultures, and which can influence the comparison of languages. A kinship of languages is often wrongly suspected on the basis of similar words, but these have been adopted from one language and originally come from another language. Van Boxhorn wanted to prevent these misinterpretations by systematically comparing inflection morphology and other grammatical features.

Works

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Johannes Goropius Becanus (Jan van Gorp van der Beke): Origines Antwerpianae, sive Cimmeriorum Becceselana novem libros complexa, Atuatica, Gigantomachia, Niloscopium, Cronia, Indoscythica, Saxsonica, Gotodanica, Amazonica, Venetica et Hyperborea . ex officina Christophori Plantini, Antwerp 1569.
  2. ^ Adrianus Scrieckius (Adriaan van Schrieck): Van t'beghin der eerster volcken van Europen, in-sonderheyt vanden oorspronck ende saecken der Neder-Landren, xxiii Boecken, Met betoon vande dwalinghen der Griecken ende Latinen op t'selve Beghin ende den ghemeynen Oorspronck. 'Ende dat de Neder-Landren metten Ga-halen ende Tuytschen t'samen in d'eerste tijden ghenaemt Kelten, ghecomen uuten Hebreen op t'Noorden ofte den Kelteghen cant des weerelts/ghelijck de Caldeen op t'Oosten/ende ander na t'Heet-Op der Sonnen; verre te boven gaen den Griecken ende Romainen in ouderdom ende spraecke. Af-beleet vanden Beghinne, totten tijd van Carolus Magnus; ende besluytende over de 4900 iaeren.. ex Typographia Francisci Belletti, Ipris Flandrorum 1614.
  3. ^ Gerda Hassler (Ed.). History of Linguistics 2008: Selected papers from the eleventh International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XI), August 28 - September 2, 2008, Potsdam . Volume 115, Studies in the History of the Language Sciences. John Benjamin Publishing, 2011. ISBN 9027287171. p. 159: "From 1647 onwards, in several of his writings, Boxhorn elaborated the idea that Scythian was the original mother language of Persian, Greek, Latin, the Germanic languages, Turkish, Welsh, Lithuanian, Russian and Latvian (cf. Boxhorn 1647).“
  4. ^ Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn: Bediedinge van de tot noch toe onbekende afgodinne Nehalennia over de dusent ende Meer jaren onder het sandt begraven, dan onlancx ontdeck op het strandt van Walcheren in Zeelandt . Willem Christiaens vander Boxe, Leiden 1647.
  5. ^ Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn: Antwoord van Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn gegeven op de Vraaghen, hem voorgestelt over de Bediedinge van de afgodinne Nehalennia, onlancx uytghegeven, in welcke de ghemeine herkomste van der Griecken, Romeinen ende Duytschen tale uyt den Scythen duydelijck bewesen, ende verscheiden oudheden van des volckeren grondelijck ontdeckt ende verklaert worden. Willem Christiaens vander Boxe, Leiden 1647.
  6. ^ Bonaventura Vulcanius (Bonaventura de Smet): De literis et lingua Getarum sive Gothorum. Item de notis Lombardicis. Quibus accesserunt specimina variarum linguarum, quarum indicem pagina quae praefationem sequitur ostendit. ex officina Plantiniana, apud Franciscum Raphelengium, Leiden 1597.
  7. ^ Johann Elichmann: Tabula Cebetis graece, arabice, latine. Item aurea carmina Pythagorae. Typis Iohannis Maire, Leiden 1640.
  8. ^ Gaston-Laurent Cœurdoux: Mémoire [letter to Abbot Barthélémy of 1767]. In: Memoires de littérature de [. . .] l'Académie Royale des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres No. 49 (Anquetil Duperron, Paris 1784–93), pp. 647–67.
  9. ^ Andreas Jäger: De lingua vetustissima Europae, Scytho-Celtica et Gothica . Wittenberg 1686.
  10. ^ Lord Monboddo: Of the origin and progress of language. J. Balfour, Edinburgh and T. Caldwell, London 1773-92; Lord Monboddo [James Burnet]:Antient metaphysics. 6 volumes. Bell and Bradfute, Edinburgh and T. Caldwell, London 1779–99.
  11. ^ Sir William Jones: Third anniversary discourse: on the Hindus. [Speech on February 2, 1786]. In:Asiatick Researches No. 1, 1798, pp. 415–31.

Literature

[edit]
  • Lyle Campbell / William J. Posner: Language Classification. History and Method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008.
  • Daniel Droixhe: La linguistique et l’appel de l’histoire, 1600–1800. Rationalisme et révolutions positivistes. Droz, Genf 1978.
  • Daniel Droixhe: Boxhorn's Bad Reputation. A Chapter in Academic Linguistics. In: Klaus D. Dutz (Ed.): Speculum historiographiae linguisticae. Kurzbeiträge der IV. Internationalen Konferenz zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften (ICHoLS IV), Trier 24-27 1987. Nodus, Münster 1989. p. 359–84.
  • Daniel Droixhe: Boxhorn, in: R. E. Asher (Eds.): The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1994.
  • Daniel Droixhe: Souvenirs de Babel. La reconstruction de l’histoire des langues de la Renaissance aux Lumières. Académie royale de langue et de littérature françaises de Belgique, Brüssel 2007.
  • R.H.F. Hofman: Marcus Zuerius Boxhorn (1612-1653), in: L. Toorians (Ed.): Kelten en de Nederlanden van prehistorie tot heden. Peeters, Leuven/Paris 1998. pp. 149–167.
  • George van Driem: Languages of the Himalayas. An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region. Brill, Leiden 2001. p. 1412.
  • B. van Wayenburg: Marcus van Boxhorn. Uitvinder van de Europese oertaal. In: Mare di libri 32 2004.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marcus_Zuerius_van_Boxhorn&oldid=1206615969"