Makati–Taguig boundary dispute
Makati–Taguig boundary dispute | |||
---|---|---|---|
Part of Internal boundary disputes in the Philippines | |||
Date | 1993–2023 | ||
Location | |||
Methods | Lawsuit | ||
Resulted in | Taguig victory
| ||
Parties | |||
Lead figures | |||
Mayor of Makati Mayor of Taguig |
The local city governments of Makati and Taguig of the Philippines were involved in a territorial dispute. The cities claimed jurisdiction over the entirety of the Fort Bonifacio military reservation, which includes the financial district of Bonifacio Global City (BGC) and Enlisted Men’s Barrios (Embo) barangays.
Taguig has administration over Bonifacio Global City and some territory to its south as part of its Fort Bonifacio barangay. In addition, Pinagsama exercises control over the McKinley Hill area and Palar Village, while Barangay Ususan controls some exclaves along Circumferential Road 5 (C-5), such as Logcom Village, Wildcat Village, and Aranai Village. Makati claims the main Bonifacio Global City area, Bonifacio Capital District that includes McKinley Hill, Manila American Cemetery, the lands along C-5, and most parts of Palar Village and Fort Andres Bonifacio to be under the jurisdiction of its barangays, Post Proper Northside and Post Proper Southside, while Ususan's exclaves along the eastbound portion of C-5 are also claimed by Barangays Rizal and Pembo. Pateros also claims to control the Embo barangays of Makati and some barangays in Taguig and Pasig. Pateros's claim includes Bonifacio Global City. However, the legal case it filed is separate from the case involving Makati and Taguig.[1]
In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled with finality that Taguig has jurisdiction over Fort Bonifacio and the Embo barangays. The jurisdiction of the Embo barangays were transferred to Taguig on 2023, and in September 2024, these barangays were apportioned to the two legislative districts of Taguig and Pateros.[2]
Background
[edit]The claims of Makati and Taguig over Fort Bonifacio and the surrounding Enlisted Men’s Barrios (Embo) barangays are deeply linked with historical events, land acquisitions, and legal proclamations, forming the basis of a complex territorial dispute.
Makati's claim is based on land ownership records indicating that the disputed areas and Fort William McKinley (now Fort Andres Bonifacio) were not under Taguig's jurisdiction, along with legal proclamations and various official documents such as censuses since 1918, elections since 1975, cadastral mappings, and presidential decrees. Furthermore, a directory of Rizal province, which encompassed Makati and Taguig (Tagig) at that time, showed that those areas are part of Makati as of 1934.[3]: 79
On the other hand, Taguig's claim traces its existence since being a pueblo of the province of Tondo (later Manila) during the Spanish colonial rule, with legislative acts in the early 1900s enacted to revise its territory, including the annexation of the adjacent municipalities of Pateros (which also had claims on the disputed area) and Muntinlupa. It is also underscored by the establishment of Fort William McKinley within Taguig's territory, as confirmed by presidential proclamations and cadastral mappings. Key documents such as the Proclamation No. 423 of 1957 and cadastral mappings exclude the disputed areas, reinforcing Taguig's territorial claim over Fort Bonifacio.
On November 22, 1993, Taguig filed a complaint before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Pasig against Makati, Executive Secretary Teofisto Guingona Jr., Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Secretary Angel Alcala, and Lands Management Bureau (LMB) Director Abelardo Palad Jr. The complaint arose from Taguig's territorial dispute with Makati over the entirety of Fort Bonifacio and the Enlisted Men's Barangays (EMBOs). Taguig averred that these areas were within its territory and jurisdiction. It also alleged that Presidential Proclamation Nos. 2475, s. 1986 and 518, s. 1990 were unconstitutional because they altered Taguig's boundaries without the required plebiscite. The trial court also imposed a 20-day temporary restraining order (TRO) against Makati, Alcala, and Palad.[4]
Supreme Court
[edit]The City of Makati seeks to nullify Special Patent Nos. 3595 and 3596 signed by President Fidel V. Ramos in 1995, which places parts of Fort Bonifacio under the jurisdiction of the City of Taguig. The suit of the City of Makati was dismissed on June 27, 2008, through Associate Justice Leonardo Quisumbing. Due to a pending civil case filed by the Taguig City Government asking the court to define its territorial boundaries, the City of Makati cannot halt Taguig from collecting taxes on land located in Fort Bonifacio because it does not have any other source of sufficient income.[5][6][7]
1994 Writ of Preliminary Injunction
[edit]On August 2, 1994, the Pasig Regional Trial Court issued a Writ of Preliminary Injunction, explicitly referring to Parcels 3 and 4, Psu-2031 comprising the entirety of the Fort Bonifacio military reservation:
- Enjoining defendants Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and Director of Land Management Bureau, from disposing of, executing deeds of conveyances over, issuing titles, over the lots covered by Proclamation Nos. 2475 and 518; and
- Enjoining defendant Municipality, now City of Makati, from exercising jurisdiction over, making improvements on, or otherwise treating as part of its territory, Parcels 3 and 4, Psu-2031 comprising Fort Bonifacio.
- Ordering defendants to pay the cost of the suit.[8]
2011 RTC ruling
[edit]In 2011, the Pasig Regional Trial Court made permanent the 1994 Writ of Preliminary Injunction that stated the entire Fort Bonifacio Military Reservation (including the Embo barangays), consisting of Parcels 3 and 4, Psu-2031, is confirmed to be part of the territory of the City of Taguig. The ruling prevented the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the Land Management Bureau from disposing of, executing deeds of conveyances over, issuing titles, over the lots covered by Proclamation Nos. 2475 and 518. It also ordered the City of Makati to refrain exercising jurisdiction, making improvements on, and from treating as part of its territory the Fort Bonifacio Military Reservation.[8]
Further rulings and appeals
[edit]The City of Makati appealed the 2011 Pasig RTC ruling to the Court of Appeals. On August 5, 2013, after a year and a half of deliberations, it was decided in a 37-page decision written by Justice Marlene Gonzales-Sison of the Court of Appeals that the jurisdiction over Fort Bonifacio has reverted to Makati from Taguig. The court upheld the constitutionality of Presidential Proclamation Nos. 2475 and 518, both of which confirmed that portions of the aforementioned military camps are under the jurisdiction of Makati. The decision also cited the fact that voters from the barangays that are subject to the dispute between Makati and Taguig have long been registered as voters of Makati, thus bolstering the former's jurisdiction over Fort Bonifacio.[9] Taguig Mayor Lani Cayetano, however, maintained that this decision was not yet final and executory, and asked Justice Gonzales-Sison to recuse herself from the case as it was discovered that her family has close ties with the Binays of Makati.[10]
On August 22, 2013, the Taguig city government filed a motion for reconsideration before the Court of Appeals' Sixth Division, affirming its claim on Fort Bonifacio.[11] With the filing of the motion, Taguig asserted jurisdiction over Fort Bonifacio. According to Taguig's legal department, jurisprudence, and the rules of procedure in the country's justice system, all say that the filing of a motion for reconsideration suspends the execution of a decision and puts it in limbo.[12] On June 15, 2016, in a 27-page decision by the Second Division of the Supreme Court, the court found Makati guilty of direct contempt for forum shopping.[13]
On October 3, 2017, the Court of Appeals upheld its final decision in favor of the city government of Taguig and not Makati. The Supreme Court also found Makati guilty of forum shopping after simultaneously appealing the Pasig Regional Trial Court (RTC) ruling and filing a petition before the Court of Appeals, both seeking the same relief.[14][15] However, Makati maintained its claim over the disputed area.[16]
Result
[edit]In a decision released on April 27, 2022, the Supreme Court upheld the 2011 Pasig RTC ruling that declared that the 729 hectares (1,800 acres) Bonifacio Global City complex, along with several surrounding barangays of Makati (Pembo, Comembo, Cembo, South Cembo, West Rembo, East Rembo, and Pitogo), was under the jurisdiction of the Taguig city government.[17] However, Makati released a statement saying that it would continue exercising jurisdiction over areas it controlled until it received an official copy of the decision.[18]
On April 3, 2023, the Supreme Court junked the motion for reconsideration that was filed by Makati to override the court's earlier decision, siding with Taguig. The city government of Taguig released a statement "welcoming the new Taguigeños", referring to the residents of the affected barangays, and saying that the Taguig LGU will start working on the transition and handover of such barangays.[19]
Makati appeal attempt
[edit]Makati Mayor Abigail Binay claimed that the dispute is "not yet over", stating that her office has received a notice that the Supreme Court has set its case with Taguig for oral arguments. This was contradicted by Supreme Court spokesperson Brian Keith Hosaka, who stated that there are no such documents.[20]
The Taguig City Government slammed Binay's comment and also expressed belief that her meeting with President Bongbong Marcos, First Lady Liza Araneta Marcos and Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo was meant to "undermine the probity of our highest officials and subvert the people's trust in the impartiality of justice".[20] Taguig's mayor sought sanctions against Binay for the statement.[21]
On June 29, the SC rejected Makati's motion to file a second appeal, saying that it is generally prohibited under their rules. It also said its en banc "is not an appellate court" and will not entertain further pleadings in the case. Makati's had filed an earlier motion for reconsideration, which was rejected in 2022.[22]
On October 5, Makati City Mayor Abigail Binay filed a motion for clarification with the petition for the issuance of a status quo ante order before the Taguig City Court Branch 153 to facilitate the proper transition of territory. This is the same court where the Taguig-Makati land row started, which was eventually resolved by the Supreme Court in favor of Taguig. The petition came after Taguig and Makati engaged in a dispute over schools and health facilities in Embo barangays, prompting national agencies to intervene.[23]
Aftermath and transition
[edit]Taguig issued a statement welcoming the ten Embo barangays to its jurisdiction.[24] Meanwhile, Makati Mayor Abigail Binay conceded defeat after the Supreme Court denied Makati's second appeal.[25] Taguig proposed the formation of a joint transition body and later conducted a meeting with officials of the affected barangays for transition.[26][27] Makati also suggested holding a plebiscite covering the contested area if both city governments agree.[28] Public facilities such as schools, barangay halls, community centers, sports facilities, became subject to ownership dispute since Taguig claims ownership of the said properties on the grounds of the Makati's unlawful possession, while Makati maintains that it is still the rightful owner of the land and facilities therein since the ruling did not consider ownership of the facilities.[28][29] Both city governments have engaged in a series of feuds in regards to the transition.
Initial reactions from the residents of the Embo barangays about the Supreme Court ruling are negative.[30] As a response to the ruling, some residents launched a series of motorcade protests. The first motorcade protest was held on August 20, 2023, followed by three more on August 27, 2023, November 5, 2023, and January 30, 2024.[31][32][33]
Students studying at the University of Makati and other Embo public schools, as well as residents served by the Ospital ng Makati who are beneficiaries of Makati's social programs, are affected.[34] Taguig would extend its scholarship program to residents of the formerly disputed area.[35] Mayor Binay, on the other hand, pledged to continue to provide assistance to residents in the area. She claimed that Taguig would not be able to do so immediately, noting that its scholarship program has a residency requirement.[36]
The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) reminded various government agencies to comply with the SC ruling with regard to budget planning and allocation.[37]
Transfer of local government
[edit]The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) ordered the transfer of the ten Embo barangays, formerly under Makati, to the jurisdiction of its Taguig field office, through a memorandum circular dated October 26, 2023. Meanwhile, the DILG National Capital Region was ordered to furnish reports to DILG Taguig of the ten barangays on the conduct of line inventory and turnover of the Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan properties, financial records, documents and money accountabilities.[38][39]
Makati has excluded the ten barangays from its national tax allotment (NTA) beginning fiscal year 2024, transferring them to Taguig by virtue of a memorandum issued by the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) dated December 28, 2023.[40] Makati Mayor Abigail Binay stated that the city expects big savings following the transfer of the ten barangays to Taguig,[41] with each of the 23 remaining barangays in Makati receiving ₱10.085 million share from the city’s basic real property tax collection (RPT) for the fiscal year 2024.[42]
Court jurisdiction
[edit]By virtue of Administrative Matter No. 23-10-01-SC dated December 5, 2023, the Supreme Court of the Philippines is set to transfer the jurisdiction of civil and criminal cases committed within the Embo barangays from Makati courts to Taguig courts effective January 1, 2024.[43] It also named seven Makati courts and four Metropolitan Trial Courts to assist their Taguig counterparts, which are pending an increase in numbers.[44][45]
In response to the jurisdictional change, on May 8, 2024, Taguig–Pateros 1st district Representative Ricardo Cruz Jr. filed House Bill No. 10378, seeking to create ten additional Regional Trial Court branches and eight additional Metropolitan Trial Court branches in Taguig.[46] As of May 13, 2024, the bill is pending with the House Committee of Justice.[47]
Businesses
[edit]In November 2023, business establishments in the Embo barangays are now advised to register in Taguig. The local government of Taguig would accommodate and process the replacement of Makati business permits.[48]
Land registration and real property tax payments
[edit]In late November 2023, land owners in the Embo barangays are now advised to pay real property tax in Taguig.[49] The Land Registration Authority (LRA) issued an order, dated January 1, 2024, to transfer all transactions related to the properties in the Embo barangays from Makati's Registry of Deeds to Taguig's Registry of Deeds.[50]
Postal codes
[edit]Effective February 2024, the Philippine Postal Corporation (PHLPOST) assigned the range of 1640 to 1649 as the new ZIP codes to the Embo barangays,[51] replacing the range of 1214 to 1218, leaving Pinagkaisahan, Makati as the only barangay under 1213, and deconsolidating the Post Proper barangays from 1200 of the Makati Central Post Office (CPO).[52][53]
Barangay | Old | New |
---|---|---|
Cembo | 1214[a] | 1640 |
Comembo | 1217 | 1641 |
Pembo | 1218[b] | 1642 |
East Rembo | 1216 | 1643 |
West Rembo | 1215 | 1644 |
South Cembo | 1214[a] | 1645 |
Pitogo | 1213[c] | 1646 |
Post Proper Northside | 1200[d] | 1647 |
Post Proper Southside | 1200[d] | 1648 |
Rizal | 1218[b] | 1649 |
- Notes
- ^ a b ZIP code of Cembo shared with South Cembo, which was part of the barangay until separation in 1966
- ^ a b ZIP code of Pembo shared with Rizal, which was part of the barangay until separation in 1996
- ^ ZIP code shared with Pinagkaisahan, Makati
- ^ a b ZIP code of Makati CPO and Buendia Avenue (Makati segment only), where the Post Proper barangays were consolidated
Emergency services
[edit]In August 2023, the Philippine National Police has started preparations to realign its police forces in the Embo barangays.[54] According to its initial plan, incumbent police officers assigned in the area would remain but would be turned over from Makati Central Police Station to Taguig Central Police Station.[55]
On November 29, 2023, Makati City Government recalled old ambulances deployed to barangay Comembo for battery replacement and subsequent repairs lasting until January 2024. They claimed repairs were necessary before returning them to their donor, the Department of Health (DOH), as per terms in the Deed of Donation executed in September 2021. In January 2024, another Comembo ambulance was temporarily recalled for inventory and licensing until it was redeployed on February 8. An ambulance was also transferred from barangay Rizal to Guadalupe Nuevo due to the former's proximity to Ospital ng Makati shared with Comembo. However, the Taguig City Government accused Makati of “summarily pulling out” those old ambulances while announcing the turnover of new ambulances to Comembo and Rizal on February 11, 2024.[56][57] Makati insisted that an official Notice of Revocation is required before handing them to Taguig.[58]
Fire substations in the Embo barangays were initially closed down by the Makati City Government, but were later reopened on January 5, 2024, by the DILG, which assumed direct supervision. National government-owned fire equipment would be supplied to the substations and Taguig firefighters would be stationed there.[59] The decision to close the substations drew criticism from Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, husband of Taguig Mayor Lani Cayetano.[60]
Electorate
[edit]Barangay and Sanggunian Kabataan
[edit]Ahead of the Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections (BSKE) held in October 2023, the COMELEC transferred the ten Embo barangays to Taguig.[61] The DILG has instructed both the cities of Makati and Taguig to assist COMELEC regarding the upcoming BSKE.[62] COMELEC has also instructed the Office of the Election Officer (OEO) of both Taguig and Makati (second district) to prepare a new list of qualified electoral boards, to print new voter's list reflecting the change to Taguig, and to ensure that voting centers would be available. Voters in the affected barangays were automatically transferred to Taguig.[61][62]
On November 12, newly elected Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) officials from the Embo barangays, along with other newly elected barangay and SK officials from Taguig, took their oath before Taguig Mayor Lani Cayetano in Bonifacio Global City.[63] However, on November 25, newly elected barangay officials and SK chairpersons from the Embo barangays opted to take their oath before Makati Mayor Abigail Binay at the Makati City Hall.[64][65]
Local election
[edit]On June 28, 2024, the COMELEC formally listed the 10 Embo barangays to be under Taguig, thereby making them eligible to vote in the 2025 local elections, for mayor, vice mayor, and city council, but initially not for the congressman (district representative) position.[66] Due to the disenfranchisement of Embo residents, the COMELEC was informed by the Taguig City Council of plans to pass a resolution reallocating the Embo barangays between Taguig’s two existing legislative districts, adding four councilors per district for a total of 24 elective seats. This process culminated with the passage of Ordinance No. 144 on September 16, followed by Senate and House Concurrent Resolutions and COMELEC Resolution No. 11069 dated September 25,[67] officially allowing Embo residents vote for a congressman for Taguig.[2][68]
Representation in the Congress and legislative districts
[edit]With the ruling, the fate of Makati's 2nd district, which covered the Embo barangays and the non-contested barangays of Guadalupe Nuevo, Guadalupe Viejo, and Pinagkaisahan, is uncertain. The remaining barangays in Makati does not satisfy the constitutional requirement of having at least 250,000 residents to be represented by a congressional district.[69] With this development, Makati may be reduced to a single district, with the Embo barangays potentially forming the third district of Taguig or being absorbed into the two existing districts.[69] Legislation and plebiscite would be still required.[70]
Makati's 2nd district is expected to remain despite not fulfilling the population constitutional requirements even with three barangays.[70] However, beginning in 2025, voters from the Embo barangays will not be able to vote for this district's representative to the House of Representatives, as legislation should be passed to revise Taguig's legislative districts to include them.[71]
On September 14, 2024, the Taguig City Council commenced its committee hearings on a proposed ordinance incorporating the Embo barangays into Taguig's two existing districts and increase the number of elected councilors in each district from 8 to 12, totaling 24. It was later enacted as Taguig City Ordinance No. 144 on September 16.[72] Subsequently, Senator Alan Peter Cayetano adopted Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 23 on September 23, followed by the House of Representatives adopting House Concurrent Resolution No. 37 on September 25.[73][74] Both Senate and House of Representatives also adopted Concurrent Resolution No. 26.[75] On September 27, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) announced that they had adopted the Senate resolution as COMELEC Resolution No. 11069, allowing voters from the Embo barangays to vote for a district representative for Taguig in 2025.[76] With this, barangays Comembo, Pembo, and Rizal will be included to the 1st district, while barangays Cembo, East Rembo, Pitogo, Post Proper Northside, Post Proper Southside, South Cembo, and West Rembo will be included to the 2nd district.[2][67]
On October 29, 2024, retired Associate Justice and former Taguig–Pateros representative Dante Tiñga filed certiorari and temporary restraining order petitions with the Supreme Court, questioning the constitutionality of Taguig City Ordinance No. 144. He also sought the nullification of COMELEC Resolution No. 11069 and Concurrent Resolution No. 26 of the Senate and House of Representatives.[72]
Administration of schools
[edit]The Regional Office of the Department of Education–National Capital Region has issued a memorandum ordering the transfer of the affected 14 Embo public elementary and high schools from the Schools Division Office (SDO) of Makati City to the Schools Division Office of Taguig City and Pateros. A meeting was held between the officials of the SDO of Taguig City and Pateros, local officials of Taguig, and the principals of the affected Embo public schools and tackled that Taguig is ready for the opening of classes in the affected schools on August 29.[77]
The schools would be later placed under the direct supervision of the national Department of Education as tensions arose between the two cities regarding the ownership, management and administration of the schools.[78] Meanwhile, the Makati City Government stated that it is willing to lease 11 out of 14 public schools in the Embo area, in an effort to reinforce their claim on the properties.[79] Transfer of management, operations and administration of the 14 affected schools from Makati to Taguig was expedited, completing it by January 1, 2024 when those were finally placed under the supervision of Taguig City's SDO.[80][81]
The Makati City Government later appealed to the DepEd to retain Makati Science High School, Fort Bonifacio Elementary School, and Fort Bonifacio High School under the SDO of Makati City and to integrate both Fort Bonifacio-named schools with the adjacent University of Makati, owned by the city government, as laboratory schools.[82][83] However, in July 2024, their request was denied by the department, citing a lack of legal basis and justification. DepEd Undersecretary Revsee Escobedo cited that granting the request would violate the Supreme Court ruling, the Constitution, and the Basic Education Act of 2001, which mandates that basic education governance is a responsibility of the national government.[84][85]
Additionally, starting from the academic year 2024–2025, students from the Embo barangays enrolled at the University of Makati would be reclassified as non-Makati residents. The waived tuition fees exclusively for Makati residents remained in place for them for the remainder of the academic year 2023–2024.[86]
Daycare centers
[edit]Originally scheduled to close on December 31, 2023, the Makati City Government decided to extend the operations of daycare centers in the Embo barangays until January 31, 2024, at which point they were closed.[87] On February 1, 2024, the Taguig City Government designated the nearest public elementary schools as temporary daycare centers, while new daycare centers are being set up in the barangays. Free transportation services will also be provided for daycare students living far away from the daycare centers.[88]
Taguig, on a statement dated February 1, 2024, criticized Makati for shutting down the daycare centers without prior notice and allegedly removing daycare equipment.[89] As a response, Makati City Administrator Claro Certeza stated that Taguig officials were already informed about the closure but chose to blame Makati for their lack of action. He argued that Taguig violated the memorandum of agreement signed with the DepEd in such designation of public elementary schools as temporary daycare centers, asserting that daycare centers are not within the scope of the DepEd.[87] Taguig later refuted claims of receiving prior notice from Makati and asserted that Makati did not coordinate with them.[90]
Healthcare
[edit]On September 25, 2023, Makati City Administrator Claro Certeza alleged that the Taguig City Government rejected the deals regarding the transfer of 8 health centers, the Ospital ng Makati, and patient data in the areas affected by the territorial dispute between the cities. The Makati City Government proposed a credit line for Taguig and offered Taguig the option to lease or purchase the facilities it built on the contested areas. However, Taguig countered the proposed deals and memorandums with Makati, asserting that the Makati City Government is acting on bad faith and their proposed deals were founded on the baseless claim that Makati owns the land and the health centers erected on it. Taguig also accused Makati of violating the agreement with the Department of Health (DOH), which stated that both Taguig and Makati shall not take up ownership of existing land and buildings while the transition discussions are ongoing.[91][92]
On January 1, 2024, the Makati City Government announced the discontinuation of Yellow Card benefits, which includes healthcare subsidies, for Embo residents (excluding city employees), and closed down health centers and lying-in clinics due to expired licenses.[93][94][95][96] On January 3, the Taguig City Government stepped in by providing free teleconsultation, free dialysis, and personal medical consultation in its health centers to Embo residents and designated catchment health centers for them in Fort Bonifacio, Pinagsama, and Ususan.[97] It later opened its new satellite pharmacy in East Rembo for them on January 5.[98] Additional services like Home Health for bedridden patients and Doctor on Call were made available to Embo residents on January 11. Makati also announced that the Ospital ng Makati offers free consultations to Embo outpatients, with laboratory services free for senior citizens aged 60 and above.[99] Residents of the Embo barangays still have access to free consultations at health centers in Makati,[100] as well as Lingkod Bayan Caravan, the city government's health caravan.[101]
In early January 2024, the Taguig City Government claimed that Makati declined to turn over the facilities and also accused it for "deceit and fraud" in closing down the health centers in the Embo barangays.[97] In response, Makati said that Taguig had long been aware of the situation before the announcement but didn't act upon it.[102][103] As a result, the DILG invited Mayors Binay and Cayetano and the DOH for a meeting over such closures.[104]
Social welfare
[edit]On September 28, 2023, the residents of the Embo barangays are now eligible to receive scholarships from the Taguig City Government. The city said it received 5,000 scholarship applications, with 387 recipients already receiving their cash allowance within the first two days.[105] Taguig also started giving out cash gifts to senior citizens of the Embo barangays.[106]
However, in late 2023, the Makati City Government continued its annual tradition of distributing Pamaskong Handog (lit. transl. Christmas Gift) bags, containing grocery items, to the residents of Embo barangays in anticipation of Christmas.[107] They also provided free rides to the residents of the Embo barangays for Ayala Avenue New Year’s Eve Countdown to 2024: A Grand Showcase of Filipino Talent, a New Year's Eve street party held in the Makati Central Business District, designating six pick-up and drop-off points in the area.[108]
On January 1, 2024, the Makati City Government discontinued the benefits and incentives of the Blu Cards of senior citizens in the Embo barangays, while clarifying that their Makatizen card may still be used as a debit card and valid ID.[95][109] Weeks later, it announced that the Solo Parent Cards that it issued to single parents from the Embo barangays are no longer valid.[110]
Road and traffic management
[edit]As of November 14, 2023, the Embo barangays were placed under the jurisdiction of Taguig's Traffic Management Office (TMO). Consequently, the area is now covered by the exemption under the expanded number coding scheme by the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) that is also applied in Taguig, having been previously under Makati's full number coding scheme (Monday to Friday, 7:00 am to 7:00 pm PHT).[48][111] However, the MMDA's coding scheme (Monday to Friday, 7:00 am to 10:00 am and 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm PHT) is still enforced on Circumferential Road 5 (C-5), which traverses the formerly disputed area. Both schemes are not implemented on holidays.
The national roads in the Embo barangays remain under the jurisdiction of Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) – Metro Manila 2nd District Engineering Office that covers Makati, Parañaque, and the outskirt of Bonifacio Global City, while those in the rest of Taguig are under DPWH – Metro Manila 1st District Engineering Office.[112]
Ownership of Makati-developed assets
[edit]The Supreme Court decision favoring Taguig in the territorial dispute does not take into consideration the properties built in the Embo barangays using Makati funds, including schools and health centers. Makati asserted that the properties have been awarded by the national government through Proclamation No. 1916, which was signed on October 14, 2009 by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.[113] However, subsequent Proclamations after 1994 that granted properties, land and other benefits to Makati in the area could be assailed or invalidated for the same faulty assumption as the 1986 Marcos proclamation. In line with the principle that accessory follows the principal, Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla stated in a three-page legal opinion dated August 29, 2024 that buildings and structures located within Embo naturally falls within Taguig's jurisdiction. However, the Department of Justice could not conclusively determine whether Makati’s health centers are obliged to pay reimbursements or rent to Taguig until the source of funds for their construction is clearly determined.[114]
If Makati insists on ownership and continues to deprive the Embo citizens of public facilities, they can be considered as builders in bad faith, and Taguig, as rightful owner of the land, is entitled to remedies to rectify this. If the lands are titled to Makati, they are subject to the property, tax, business, and zoning laws of Taguig, and if untitled, Makati is basically squatting on Taguig lands. The transfer of registry records will be the solution to this conundrum. The case is similar to the 1989 and 2001 Camarines Norte vs. Quezon territorial dispute, in which the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Santa Elena, Camarines Norte over Calauag, Quezon. The municipality was able to gain most of the government properties in the disputed barangays like barangay halls, schools, covered courts without the need for the writ of execution.[115]
Since September 2023, the construction of the Makati Intra-city Subway has been stalled for a required reworking, as its planned depot and some stations were initially intended to be located in the formerly disputed area.[116][117]
On April 1, 2024, Makati announced that it filed a complaint with the Office of the Ombudsman against three Taguig city government employees, including the treasurer Voltaire Enriquez, for alleged graft, corruption, and neglect of duty. This stemmed from an alleged delay since May 2023 by the treasurer's office in releasing tax clearance documents for three parcels of land acquired by Makati from the Bases Conversion and Development Authority.[118] Taguig denounced Makati's actions as "harassment."[119]
Makati Park and Garden standoff
[edit]On March 1, 2024, Taguig TMO members attempted to seize control of Makati Park and Garden, but was prevented by the Makati Public Safety Department (PSD).[120] Taguig later closed the park and the adjacent Makati Aqua Sports Arena (MASA) on March 3, 2024, citing lack of permits. However, Makati contended that the closure order did not include MASA and also accused Taguig of continuously land-grabbing their facilities.[29][121] It also argued against needing permits or paying taxes to Taguig, citing Presidential Proclamation No. 1916 series of 2009.[122] The closure of MASA affected 4,400 Makati public school students who use it for their swimming lessons.[123] Taguig, for its part, cited that under the Local Government Code, it is authorized to regulate any business, trade, and activity within its jurisdiction, and it cited Makati’s “unlawful possession” of the park. [124]
During the park's attempted takeover and closure, Makati city government employees were reportedly trapped inside the park and in MASA, respectively. The incident led to the filing of illegal detention cases against Taguig officials led by Mayor Lani Cayetano before the Taguig City Prosecutor’s Office.[125] The Taguig city government later refuted the accusations as false and labeled Makati a bully as well, denouncing its closures as "illegal and immoral."[126][127][128] The illegal detention charges were later dismissed due to lack of evidence.[129]
Religious jurisdiction
[edit]Following the ruling, the Pembo locale of the Iglesia ni Cristo in Barangay Rizal, alongside other local congregations in Taguig, was transferred from Ecclesiastical District of Metro Manila South to the Ecclesiastical District of Metro Manila East. Consequently, the Ecclesiastical District of Metro Manila South was reduced to include only local congregations in Las Piñas and Muntinlupa, as those in southern Makati, Parañaque, and Pasay were transferred to the Ecclesiastical District of Makati.[130][131][132][133]
However, the six Roman Catholic parishes in the Embo barangays remain under the Archdiocese of Manila, which includes Makati, and were not transferred to the Diocese of Pasig, which includes Taguig. This is because diocesan boundaries are determined by the Vatican and do not necessarily follow civil boundaries.[134] Consequently, such parishes remain under the jurisdiction of the episcopal vicar for Makati.[135]
Additionally, the group that meets at the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints chapel in Comembo continues to be referred to as Makati Philippines East Stake despite the barangay's new location in northern Taguig.[136]
References
[edit]- ^ San Juan, Joel (May 12, 2023). "Supreme Court gives Pateros say in land row". BusinessMirror. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
- ^ a b c de Leon, Dwight (September 27, 2024). "Comelec allows EMBO residents in Taguig to vote for congressman in 2025". Rappler. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
- ^ Salonga, Isayas (1934). Rizal Province directory. Vol. 1. Manila: University of Michigan Digital Collections. Retrieved April 16, 2024.
- ^ G.R. No. 168781 (September 14, 2007), City of Makati vs.The Hon. Judge Briccio C. Ygaña, Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court, Pasig City, Branch 153, and Municipality of Taguig, The Lawphil Project, retrieved March 23, 2024
- ^ "Court junks Taguig's suit to nullify Ramos patents". manilastandardtoday.com. Retrieved July 9, 2015.
- ^ G.R. No. 163175 (June 27, 2008), City of Makati, Jejomar Binay and Ernesto S. Mercado, Petitioners, vs. Municipality (now City) of Taguig, Metropolitan Manila, the Executive Secretary, Bases Conversion and Development Authority, Fort Bonifacio Development Corporation, Register of Deeds Vicente A. Garcia and the Land Management Bureau Director, Respondents., retrieved May 14, 2022
- ^ Salaverria, Leila (June 30, 2008). "Court rules against Makati in property dispute case". Inquirer.net. Archived from the original on September 22, 2013. Retrieved July 9, 2015.
- ^ a b "G.R. No. 235316". Supreme Court e-Library. December 1, 2021. Retrieved August 21, 2024. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ "Fort Bonifacio belongs to Makati – CA". Rappler. August 5, 2013. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- ^ Frialde, Mike (August 14, 2013). "Taguig seeks recusal of judge in Fort Bonifacio case". The Philippine Star. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig City Files a Motion for Reconsideration". taguig.gov.ph. Retrieved July 9, 2015.
- ^ "Full Text and Summary of Makati vs. Taguig Case - G.R. No. 163175 - June 27, 2008". www.digest.ph. Retrieved 2024-06-11.
- ^ Torres-Tupas, Tetch (August 1, 2016). "Makati guilty of direct contempt over BGC row with Taguig". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved January 22, 2017.
- ^ Ramos, Marlon (November 6, 2017). "CA: Taguig owns BGC, not Makati". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
- ^ Punay, Edu (November 6, 2017). "It's final: BGC belongs to Taguig". The Philippine Star. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
- ^ Lalu, Gabriel Pabico (August 22, 2018). "Binay insists: BGC, other barangays are Makati". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved May 31, 2020.
- ^ Panaligan, Rey (April 27, 2022). "SC affirms RTC ruling for Taguig City in territorial dispute with Makati City". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved April 27, 2022.
- ^ Garcia, Patrick (April 28, 2022). "Contested areas in SC ruling to remain under Makati City's jursidiction – LGU". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved April 28, 2022.
- ^ "Taguig LGU lauds SC decision over Fort Bonifacio ownership". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved April 3, 2023.
- ^ a b Abrogar, Sofia (June 10, 2023). "Taguig government slams Makati mayor Binay's BGC complex claims, asserts ownership". Inquirer.net. Retrieved July 9, 2023.
- ^ Torres-Tupas, Tetch (June 13, 2023). "Taguig mayor seeks sanctions vs Makati's Abby Binay over territorial dispute statement". Inquirer.net. Retrieved July 9, 2023.
- ^ "Supreme Court rejects Makati's bid for second appeal on Taguig territory row". ABS-CBN News. June 30, 2023. Retrieved July 4, 2023.
- ^ "Makati asks court for status quo, clarification on SC decision in Taguig dispute". Rappler. October 5, 2023. Retrieved October 5, 2023.
- ^ Cordero, Ted (July 1, 2023). "Taguig prepared to take in 10 barangays transferred from Makati". GMA News. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
- ^ Murcia, Alvin (July 18, 2023). "Binay concedes on Makati-Taguig row: 'Tapos na ang laban'" [Binay concedes on Makati-Taguig row: 'The fight is over']. Daily Tribune. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
- ^ "Taguig proposes joint transition team with Makati for BGC". July 20, 2023.
- ^ Hicap, Jonathan (January 6, 2024). "Taguig mayor meets EMBO barangay officials amid ongoing dispute". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 26, 2024.
- ^ a b "Binay airs concern over Makati facilities". The Philippine STAR.
- ^ a b Ombay, Giselle (3 March 2024). "Citing no permits, Taguig closes Makati Park and Garden". GMA News Online. Retrieved 3 March 2024.
- ^ "Cayetano to Embo residents: "Give Taguig's love a chance"". ABS-CBN News. September 20, 2023. Retrieved January 29, 2024.
- ^ Victoria, Vera (August 20, 2023). "EMBO Barangays Residents Stage Motorcade and Prayer Vigil". Taguig.com. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
- ^ "EMBO residents protest Taguig transfer in motorcade (Rappler)". August 27, 2023. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
- ^ De Guzman, Karen (January 30, 2024). "Ilang residente ng Embo barangays, umapelang ibalik sila sa Makati". ABS-CBN News (in Filipino). Retrieved April 27, 2024.
- ^ "Makati mayor worries over fate of 300K residents of District 2". BusinessMirror. July 17, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
- ^ "Taguig's inclusive scholarship program: A game changer for former Makati barangays". Philippine Daily Inquirer. July 11, 2023. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
- ^ Servallos, Neil Jayson (July 18, 2023). "Makati to aid residents affected by land dispute". The Philippine Star. Retrieved July 18, 2023.
- ^ "DBM: Comply with SC ruling on Makati-Taguig budgeting". BusinessWorld. September 17, 2023. Retrieved September 21, 2023.
- ^ "DILG's Taguig office to take control of 10 EMBO villages". Philippine News Agency. November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
- ^ "DILG-Taguig to handle programs, projects in 10 former Makati barangays". Inquirer.net. November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 8, 2023.
- ^ "Makati City excludes 10 EMBO barangays in 2024 tax allocation". CNN Philippines. January 5, 2024. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 5, 2024.
- ^ "Makati expects big savings from EMBOs transfer to Taguig". Manila Standard. February 1, 2024. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
- ^ "23 Makati barangays gain from city's loss of Embo areas". ABS-CBN News. February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
- ^ Pultra, Benjamin (November 17, 2023). "SC directs transfer of case jurisdiction from Makati to Taguig by 2024". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
- ^ "SC Designates Additional Courts to Assist Taguig City Courts". Supreme Court of the Philippines. January 4, 2024. Retrieved July 13, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig Mayor should ask Congress representatives to file urgent bill creating additional courts – Mayor Abby". Makati Web Portal. January 8, 2024. Retrieved January 22, 2023.
- ^ House Bill No. 10378 (May 8, 2024), An Act Creating Ten (10) Additional Branches of the Regional Trial Court and Five (5) Additional Branches of the Metropolitan Trial Court, in the National Capital Judicial Region, to be Stationed in the City of Taguig, Metro Manila, Amending for the Purpose Section 14, Paragraph (D) and Section 27 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 129, Otherwise Known as “The Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980”, as Amended, and Appropriating Funds Therefor (PDF), House of Representatives, retrieved July 13, 2024
- ^ "Hon. Cruz, Ricardo Jr. S." House of Representatives. Retrieved July 13, 2024.
- ^ a b Bautista, Nillicent (November 16, 2023). "'Embo' businesses advised to register in Taguig". PhilStar Global. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
- ^ "LAKING TIPID PARA SA MGA TAGA-EMBO: MAGBAYAD NG AMILYAR SA TAGUIG CITY!". I Love Taguig (facebook). November 27, 2023. Retrieved September 11, 2024.
- ^ Hicap, Jonathan (February 8, 2024). "LRA transfers EMBO barangay property transactions to Taguig". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- ^ BNFM Makati (February 29, 2024). "10 Embo Barangays sa Taguig, may bago nang zip code assignment". Brigada News Philippines (in Filipino). Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ "Makati City Zip Code". Makati. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
- ^ "Zip Code Locate". Philpost. Retrieved March 16, 2024.
- ^ Villanueva, Rhodina; Tupas, Emmanuel (August 19, 2023). "PNP realigns forces for 10 'embo' barangays". The Philippine Star. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- ^ Caliwan, Christian Lloyd (August 18, 2023). "PNP: No transfer of Makati cops in 'embo' areas to Taguig control". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- ^ "'Stop playing the victim'". Daily Tribune. February 24, 2024. Retrieved February 26, 2024.
- ^ Hicap, Jonathan (February 5, 2024). "Taguig replaces ambulances in EMBO barangays". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 15, 2024.
- ^ Zurbano, Joel (February 23, 2024). "Makati clarifies recall of ambulance in Comembo". Manila Standard. Retrieved February 26, 2024.
- ^ Ballecer, Jose Rafael (January 6, 2024). "Makati-Owned 'Embo' Fire Stations Reopen Following DILG Intervention". One News. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- ^ Torregoza, Hannah (January 5, 2024). "Cayetano slams Makati mayor for closing fire, health stations in EMBO barangays". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- ^ a b "Comelec: 10 EMBO barangays now considered part of Taguig for BSKE". CNN Philippines. August 21, 2023. Archived from the original on August 21, 2023. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
- ^ a b "DILG tells Makati, Taguig to help Comelec with BSKE matters in areas affected by transfer". GMA News. August 20, 2023. Retrieved August 22, 2023.
- ^ Zurbano, Joel (November 13, 2023). "Cayetano swears in new village, SK officials in Taguig". Manila Standard. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
- ^ "Newly elected EMBO Barangay, SK officials opt to be sworn in by Mayora Abby". Makati Web Portal. November 26, 2023. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
- ^ Cruz, James Patrick (November 25, 2023). "Loyalty check? Newly-elected EMBO barangay officials take oath before Makati Mayor Binay". Rappler. Retrieved November 25, 2023.
- ^ Cabato, Luisa (June 25, 2024). "Comelec: Embo barangay residents can vote in 2025 polls". Inquirer.net. Retrieved June 29, 2024.
- ^ a b "Resolution No. 11069" (PDF). Lawphil. Commission on Elections. September 25, 2024. Retrieved November 9, 2024.
- ^ Torres, Sherrie Anne (June 28, 2024). "Comelec releases resolution listing 10 EMBO barangays to Taguig City". ABS-CBN News.
- ^ a b Aurelio, Julie (22 July 2023). "SC ruling opens issue on Taguig House seats". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
- ^ a b "After SC ruling, Makati's congressional seat hangs in the balance". Rappler. 26 July 2023. Retrieved 27 July 2023.
- ^ Torres, Sherrie Ann (June 25, 2024). "'Embo' residents can't vote for House rep in 2025: Comelec". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
- ^ a b Galvez, Daphne (October 29, 2024). "SC asked: Void Taguig ordinance increasing council seats". The Philippine Star. Retrieved October 29, 2024.
- ^ Ferreras, Vince Angelo (September 25, 2024). "House adopts resolution preventing the disenfranchisement of 'EMBO' voters". GMA News Online. Retrieved September 25, 2024.
- ^ "Cayetano bats for EMBOs' voting rights in 2025 local elections" (Press release). Senate of the Philippines. September 23, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
- ^ {{cite press release|url=https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/press_release/2024/1001_cayetanoa1.asp%7Ctitle=Cayetano secures voting rights of EMBO barangays in landmark Comelec resolution|date=October 1, 2024|accessdate=November 1, 2024|publisher=[[Senate of the Philippines[[}}
- ^ Casucian, Jiselle Ann (September 27, 2024). "Comelec adopts Senate reso to include EMBO barangays in Taguig districts". GMA Integrated News. Retrieved November 1, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig LGU all systems go in opening of classes in schools formerly under Makati". Inquirer.net. 11 August 2023. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
- ^ "DepEd takes supervision of EMBO schools in Makati-Taguig row". GMA News. 17 August 2023. Retrieved 19 August 2023.
- ^ Cruz, James Patrick (23 August 2023). "Makati to lease some EMBO schools to Taguig". Rappler. Retrieved 25 August 2023.
- ^ "DepEd task force eyes completing transition plan for schools in Makati-Taguig row in November". CNN Philippines. November 10, 2023. Archived from the original on November 12, 2023. Retrieved November 12, 2023.
- ^ "DepEd: Taguig, Makati conclude 'orderly' transition of EMBO schools". CNN Philippines. January 15, 2024. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
- ^ Sarao, Zacarian (February 15, 2024). "Abby Binay asks Sara Duterte to resolve issues in 3 public schools". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved February 15, 2024.
- ^ Sevillano, Stephanie (February 16, 2024). "DepEd fast-tracks review of Makati's request to keep 3 EMBO schools". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
- ^ Galvez, Daphnie (July 29, 2024). "DepEd nixes Makati's request to manage 3 'embo' schools". PhilStar Global. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
- ^ Argosino, Faith (July 28, 2024). "DepEd denies Makati's request to manage 3 Embo schools". Inquirer.net. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
- ^ "UMak students na residente ng EMBO barangays libre pa rin tuition fee sa SY 2023-2024" (in Filipino). Abante TNT. January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- ^ a b Bautista, Nillicent (February 3, 2024). "Makati hits Taguig over closure of 'embo' daycare centers". Philippine Star. Retrieved February 3, 2024.
- ^ Victoria, Vera (February 2, 2024). "Children Affected by the Closure of Daycare Centers in EMBO Barangays by Makati City to be Temporarily Relocated to Nearby Elementary Schools and Barangay Hall by Taguig". Taguig News. Retrieved February 2, 2024.
- ^ Hicap, Jonathan (February 1, 2024). "Taguig LGU bewails closure of daycare centers in EMBO barangays". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved February 1, 2024.
- ^ Bautista, Nillicent (February 6, 2024). "Makati closed 'embo' daycare centers without notice – Taguig". Retrieved February 6, 2024.
- ^ "Makati, Taguig clash on transfer of health facilities, data". GMA News Online. September 25, 2023. Retrieved September 26, 2023.
- ^ "Taguig says Makati 'violates' deal with DOH on transfer of health facilities". CNN Philippines. September 25, 2023. Archived from the original on September 26, 2023. Retrieved September 26, 2023.
- ^ Cruz, James Patrick (January 1, 2024). "EMBO residents lose healthcare subsidy from Makati City gov't". Rappler. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
- ^ Dioquino, Aaron Homer (January 1, 2024). "Yellow cards of residents in EMBO barangays no longer valid starting Jan. 1 - Makati gov't". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
- ^ a b "EMBO residents no longer eligible for Makati benefits". CNN Philippines. January 2, 2024. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
- ^ Bosano, Raphael (January 3, 2024). "Taguig to Makati: Do not politicize healthcare and residents' welfare". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
- ^ a b Hicap, Jonathan (January 3, 2024). "Taguig LGU to provide teleconsultation to EMBO residents after closure of health centers". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig City opens satellite pharmacy for EMBO barangays". CNN Philippines. January 6, 2024. Archived from the original on January 6, 2024. Retrieved January 6, 2024.
- ^ Baustista, Nillicent (January 13, 2024). "Makati, Taguig offer health services to 'embo' residents". The Philippine Star. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig, Makati offer free medical services to EMBO barangays". GMA News Online. January 11, 2024. Retrieved January 16, 2024.
- ^ Zurbano, Joel (February 8, 2024). "Makati grants EMBO residents free access to various health services". Manila Standard. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
- ^ Cruz, James Patrick (January 3, 2024). "Taguig offers free teleconsults after Makati closes EMBO health centers". Rappler. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig knew about imminent closure of health centers in EMBO barangays but did nothing – Makati official". Makati Web Portal. January 3, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
- ^ Bosano, Raphael (January 4, 2024). "DILG to sit with local officials, DOH to resolve Makati-Taguig row". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
- ^ "Students from EMBO barangays get scholarships". PhilStar Global. September 28, 2023. Retrieved September 29, 2023.
- ^ "Taguig LGU starts giving P100,000 to centenarians in EMBO barangays". GMA News Online. September 28, 2023. Retrieved September 29, 2023.
- ^ "No letting go! Makati Mayor Binay to distribute X-mas bags to EMBO residents". Politiko Metro Manila. November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 12, 2023.
- ^ "Libreng Sakay (New Year's Eve celebration)". Makati Web Portal. December 29, 2023. Retrieved January 1, 2024.
- ^ Garcia, Patrick (January 2, 2024). "Makati City halts effectivity of EMBO residents' BLU cards". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved January 2, 2024.
- ^ Bautista, Nillicent (January 23, 2024). "Solo parent cards of 'embo' residents not valid in Makati". The Philippine Star. Retrieved January 23, 2024.
- ^ "Embo barangays in Taguig City are now exempt from number coding". TopGear.com.ph. November 15, 2023. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
- ^ "ROAD AND BRIDGE INFORMATION APPLICATION". Department of Public Works and Highways. Retrieved November 18, 2023.
- ^ Presidential Proclamation No. 1916 (October 14, 2009), Amending Proclamation No. 518 Dated January 31, 1990, Which Excluded Certain Parcels of Land in Barangays Cembo, South Cembo, East Rembo, West Rembo, Pembo, Rizal (Pembo), Pitogo and Comembo, All in the City of Makati From the Operation of Proclamation No. 423, Series of 1957 Which Established the Fort William McKinley (now Fort Bonifacio), as Amended by Proclamation No. 2475, Series of 1986, by Reserving Certain Parcels of Land Embraced Therein for Tenement and Other Public Purposes and Granting Ownership Thereof in Favor of the City of Makati, Lawphil, retrieved July 12, 2024
- ^ Cruz, James Patrick (September 24, 2024). "Taguig holds authority over buildings, structures in EMBO – DOJ". Rappler. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig City: Writ of execution not necessary to exercise jurisdiction over 'Embo' barangays". inquirer.net. August 17, 2023. Retrieved September 8, 2024.
- ^ Cruz, James Patrick (September 6, 2023). "$3.5-billion Makati subway project needs rework after Supreme Court ruling on land dispute". Rappler. Retrieved March 15, 2024.
- ^ Legaspi, Zeus (January 25, 2024). "Transfer of Embo barangays to Taguig affected Makati's subway project". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved March 15, 2024.
- ^ Bajo, Anna Felicia (April 1, 2024). "Makati files complaint vs. Taguig execs for alleged graft, neglect of duty". GMA Integrated News. Retrieved April 16, 2024.
- ^ Hicap, Jonathan (April 1, 2024). "Makati's graft charges vs treasurer and 2 employees baseless, Taguig LGU says". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved April 16, 2024.
- ^ Mendoza, John Eric (1 March 2024). "Guards foil Taguig traffic team's attempt to enter Makati park". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 1 March 2024.
- ^ Garcia, Patrick (March 8, 2024). "'Sorry sa mga batang Makatizens': Mayor Abby laments closure of aqua sports arena". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
- ^ Legaspi, Zeus (4 March 2024). "'Contested park awarded to Makati City by nat'l government'". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 5 March 2024.
- ^ "Taguig closure of Makati facility halts swimming lessons of 4,400 students". Makati Web Portal. March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig temporarily closes Makati Park due to lack of permits". ABS-CBN News. March 3, 2024. Retrieved March 19, 2024.
- ^ Casilao, Joahna Lei (March 5, 2024). "Makati employees file complaints vs. Taguig mayor et al". GMA Integrated News. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
- ^ "Taguig gov't says Makati City personnel lied in complaints". GMA Integrated News. March 8, 2024. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
- ^ Bautista, Nillicent (March 9, 2024). "Makati slams Taguig's closure of sports facility". The Philippine Star. Retrieved March 9, 2024.
- ^ Caliwan, Christian Lloyd (March 4, 2024). "PNP secures EMBO park amid tense Makati-Taguig feud". Philippine News Agency. Retrieved March 12, 2024.
- ^ Batallones, Jeck (September 19, 2024). "Taguig court dismisses illegal detention raps vs Mayor Cayetano due to lack of evidence". ABS-CBN News. Retrieved September 19, 2024.
- ^ "Ecclesiastical District of Makati". Iglesia ni Cristo. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
- ^ "Ecclesiastical District of Metro Manila South". Iglesia ni Cristo. Archived from the original on June 15, 2021. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
- ^ "Ecclesiastical District of Metro Manila East". Iglesia ni Cristo. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
- ^ "Ecclesiastical District of Metro Manila East". Iglesia ni Cristo. Archived from the original on September 24, 2020. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
- ^ Esmaquel, Paterno III (March 4, 2024). "In Makati-Taguig dispute, here's one thing that won't change for EMBOs". Rappler. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
- ^ "CIRCULAR || APPOINTMENTS APRIL - MAY 2024". The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Manila - Office of Communications. May 6, 2024. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
- ^ "Meetinghouse". The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Retrieved September 29, 2024.
External links
[edit]- Municipality of Makati (Now City of Makati) vs. Municipality of Taguig (Now City of Taguig) G.R. No. 235316. December 01, 2021 – Supreme Court of the Philippines