Loughrin v. United States
Appearance
Loughrin v. United States | |
---|---|
Decided June 23, 2014 | |
Full case name | Loughrin v. United States |
Citations | 573 U.S. 351 (more) |
Holding | |
A conviction of the crime of knowingly executing a scheme to obtain property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank "by means of false or fraudulent pretenses," does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
Concur/dissent | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
Laws applied | |
Loughrin v. United States, 573 U.S. 351 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a conviction of the crime of knowingly executing a scheme to obtain property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank "by means of false or fraudulent pretenses," does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution.[1][2]