Jump to content

Islamic Revival in British India

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900
English cover
AuthorBarbara D. Metcalf
LanguageEnglish
SubjectDeobandi movement
GenreThesis
PublisherPrinceton University Press
Publication date
1982
Publication placeUnited States
Pages402
ISBN9781400856107
OCLC889252131
Websiteprinceton.edu

Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900 is a book authored by Barbara D. Metcalf, a professor at the University of California. Originally, this book emerged as a revised edition of her doctoral dissertation and was published in 1982 by Princeton University Press.[1] At its core, the book focused on the Deobandi movement formative phase. It is the first major monograph dedicated to the institutional and intellectual history of this movement.[2]Moreover, it sought to clarify the transformative journey undertaken by Islamic scholars, commencing in the 18th century. This journey was catalyzed by the challenges faced by Indian Islam in the aftermath of the 1857 Mutiny, prompting a diverse array of approaches for a resolution.[3] Throughout her research, the author gathered pertinent materials in Urdu to present a precise depiction of Deoband's organizational structure.

The book opens with a detailed examination of the landscape of 18th-century Islamic reform movements. Subsequently, it reserves four detailed chapters to present an account of the establishment, administration, financial intricacies, and the education and training of young scholars at the Deoband seminary. The work engaged in a critical examination of various styles of religious leadership, delving into the multifaceted roles of muftis, shaikhs, writers, and debaters, often with an unwavering focus on details. A chapter is set aside for an analysis of the social milieu within which the Deobandi ulama operated. Furthermore, the book examines through alternative trends within Sunni Islam, including the Ahl-i Hadith, the Barelwis, the Nadwatul Ulama, and Deoband's rival, Aligarh. It seeks to position Deoband within a historical context and accentuate its unique attributes when compared to other institutions of Indian Muslim erudition and the tapestry of various religious movements.[4]

Content

[edit]

The initial chapters investigate the historical context of the Deobandi movement, examining the role of Indian Islamic scholars in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. It highlights their growing significance after the decline of the Mughal state, contrasting developments in northern India's Muslim culture centers. The emphasis on ma'qulut in the Dars-i Nizami at the Firangi Mahal in Lucknow is contrasted with Shah Waliullah Dehlawi and his dynasty's focus on Hadith in Delhi.[5]

The core section details the founding of the Darul Uloom Deoband in 1867 following the destruction of Delhi. It presents sympathetic portraits of the Deobandi movement's founders, Qasim Nanawtawi and Rashid Ahmad Gangohi, drawn from their writings and Urdu biographies. Metcalf references original sources, including Darul Uloom's annual reports, providing evidence for the balance between tradition and reform in the Deobandis' approach.[5]

Institutionally, Darul Uloom's networks and donors draw inspiration from the West, influenced by founders' experiences at Delhi College. The deliberate rejection of traditional ties for broader linkages aligns the Deobandis with a trend in nineteenth-century Indian Islam toward institutional and ideological rationalization. This shift is evident in discussions about attempts to subordinate the seminary to local interests and the character of religious teachings at Deoband, emphasizing Hadith and Hanafi law complemented by Sufi spirituality without pir worship.[5]

The roles of leading Deobandi 'ulama' as educators, issuers of fatawa, and participants in religious disputes are examined. Their impact as writers in developing Urdu as the primary language of Indian Islam is noted, particularly Ashraf Ali Thanwi's Bahishti Zewar. The 'ulama's social background is analyzed based on annual reports, dispelling common misconceptions about their status as part of the ashraf.[6]

The final chapters focus on contemporary conflicts between the Deobandis and other movements within Indian Islam, such as the Ahl-i Hadith, Barelwi 'ulama', Aligarh movement, and Nadwatu l-'Ulama'.[6]

Theme

[edit]

The author presents her perspective through the lens of Islamic scholars.[7] According to Francis Robinson, the essence of the entire book lies in recognizing the existence of an Islamic reality—a prerequisite for any genuinely fruitful study.[7] Robinson emphasizes Metcalf's achievements, particularly her investigation into the varied responses of northern Indian ulama to the decline of Muslims and the dominance of the British. This exploration sheds new light on groups such as the Barelwis, Ahl-i-Hadiths, Nadwatul Ulama, and the Deoband school.[7] Metcalf's second success reveals the vibrancy of 18th and 19th-century Indian Islam, exposing the emergence of innovative religious forms.[8] The third success unveils the reasons behind the success of the Deobandi way, while the fourth provides ample evidence depicting the vulgarization of Islamic learning by 19th-century Indian ulama.[9][10] Amedeo Maiello observes a shift in focus from modernist advocates in previous studies to Metcalf's emphasis on the response of Islamic scholars to the social and cultural disorientation of their time. This shift highlights the intricate yet unified nature of the Indian Muslim pattern of reform.[11] Moreover, Maiello emphasizes the crucial moderating role played by Islamic scholars in updating the inherited tradition.[11] Yohanan Friedmann favored the book's consideration of the extent to which Sufi doctrine and practice influenced Deoband.[12]

Source

[edit]

The author drew insights from the annual reports of Darul Ulooms, consultative council meeting minutes, and analogous records from Deoband's sister institution, Mazahir Uloom. Additionally, they delved into numerous biographies of prominent Deobandis, characterized by a distinct hagiographic tone.[12] Yohanan Friedmann urges a discerning approach, emphasizing the importance of a critical perspective. While the material is used thoughtfully, reservations are warranted. Its extensive application in portraying the spiritual atmosphere in Deoband is reasonable, given that stories of teachers' exemplary conduct likely originated within the institution. However, concerns arise when the author describes actual conditions at Darul Uloom, such as ideal teacher relationships and their aversion to material gain. The inherently enthusiastic nature of the biographies prompts readers to approach them with skepticism, especially in the context of life at Deoband.[12]

Feature

[edit]

This composition distinguishes itself through a thoughtfully curated array of maps, tables, and a hint of illustrations. In tandem with a thorough glossary and index, the bibliography maintains a discerning focus on English titles.[6] Christopher Shackle highlights a possible reader challenge: discerning among various 'ulama' with akin names in the text. Shackle's proposal to incorporate a brief biographical index could subtly enrich the reader's experience.[6]

Reception

[edit]

Scholars widely acknowledge the book for its originality, substantial contribution to knowledge, and in-depth analysis of Islamic movements in British India, highlighting its role in shaping scholarly understanding. While some critiques exist, the overall reception emphasizes the book's significance. Gowher Rizvi underscores its contribution beyond simplistic categorizations, emphasizing the importance of considering participants' perspectives and beliefs for a more profound exploration.[13] William R. Roff sees it as a significant work of historical and cultural analysis, describing it as a valuable addition to studies of Islam and society in the modern world.[14] Christopher Shackle positions it as essential reading for students of Indian Islam, emphasizing its relevance to those concerned with the modern period.[15] Yohanan Friedmann acknowledges the book's provision of fresh material as a substantial contribution to knowledge about a crucial religious movement in modern Muslim India.[16] Similarly, Francis Robinson commends its originality, technical skill, and richness of ideas.[17] Amedeo Maiello praises Metcalf's adept use of original sources, including school records and unpublished material, viewing the book as a much-needed study in modern Muslim Indian history.[18] Gopal Krishna, former Director of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, opines, "This meticulously scholarly book is truly marvelous."[19] The Daily Star rates it as an "outstanding study."[20] However, Annemarie Schimmel, while acknowledging the social science approach, criticizes the author's lack of knowledge in classical Islamic languages and the tradition of Islamic education, pointing out a potential limitation in the book's scope.[21]

Legacy

[edit]

In 2002, Muhammad Qasim Zaman penned The Ulama in Contemporary Islam as an expanded rendition of Islamic Revival in British India. While Metcalf delves into the origins of the Deobandi movement, Zaman scrutinizes their approach in strategizing, articulating, contesting, and safeguarding their religious authority through a range of discursive and nondiscursive means.[22][20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Rizvi, Gowher (1983). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900". The American Historical Review. 88 (4): 1050. doi:10.2307/1874144. ISSN 0002-8762. JSTOR 1874144. Archived from the original on 7 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  2. ^ Tareen, Sher Ali (2014). "Deoband Madrasa". Oxford Bibliographies Online. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780195390155-0019. Archived from the original on 28 October 2022. Retrieved 9 November 2023.
  3. ^ Schimmel, Annemarie (1984). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 104 (2): 378. doi:10.2307/602213. ISSN 0003-0279. JSTOR 602213. Archived from the original on 31 January 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  4. ^ Friedmann, Yohanan (1984). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India. Deoband 1860-1900". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 16 (1): 151. doi:10.1017/S0020743800027689. ISSN 0020-7438. JSTOR 162948. S2CID 161148825. Archived from the original on 6 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  5. ^ a b c Shackle 1984, p. 374.
  6. ^ a b c d Shackle 1984, p. 375.
  7. ^ a b c Robinson 1984, p. 339.
  8. ^ Robinson 1984, p. 340.
  9. ^ Robinson 1984, p. 341.
  10. ^ Robinson 1984, p. 342.
  11. ^ a b Maiello 1984, p. 294.
  12. ^ a b c Friedmann 1984, p. 151.
  13. ^ Rizvi 1983, p. 1051.
  14. ^ Roff, William R. (1983). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900". The Journal of Asian Studies. 42 (3): 705. doi:10.2307/2055574. ISSN 0021-9118. JSTOR 2055574. S2CID 154514853. Archived from the original on 9 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  15. ^ Shackle, C. (1984). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 47 (2): 375. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00037769. ISSN 0041-977X. JSTOR 617475. S2CID 162955825. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  16. ^ Friedmann, Yohanan (1983). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India. Deoband, 1860-1900". Pacific Affairs. 56 (3): 565. doi:10.2307/2758230. ISSN 0030-851X. JSTOR 2758230. Archived from the original on 9 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  17. ^ Robinson, Francis (1984). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860-1900". Modern Asian Studies. 18 (2): 344. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00014475. ISSN 0026-749X. JSTOR 312439. S2CID 144232956. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  18. ^ Maiello, Amedeo (1984). "Review of Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband 1860–1900". Oriente Moderno. 3 (64) (7/12): 296. ISSN 0030-5472. JSTOR 25816916. Archived from the original on 6 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  19. ^ Krishna, Gopal (1984). "Book reviews : BARBARA DALY METCALF, Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband. 1860-1900". The Indian Economic & Social History Review. 21 (1): 137. doi:10.1177/001946468402100113. ISSN 0019-4646. S2CID 144637273. Archived from the original on 11 November 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  20. ^ a b Rahman, Md Anisur (28 January 2021). "Worth A Re-read : A History Of The Ulama In British India". The Daily Star. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
  21. ^ Schimmel 1984, p. 379.
  22. ^ Talib, Mohammad (2005). "Review of The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change". Journal of Islamic Studies. 16 (2): 228. doi:10.1093/jis/eti136. ISSN 0955-2340. JSTOR 26199576. Archived from the original on 12 November 2023. Retrieved 17 November 2023.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_Revival_in_British_India&oldid=1256163948"