In re Stolar
| In re Stolar | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 9, 1969 Reargued October 14–15, 1970 Decided February 23, 1971 | |
| Full case name | Application of Martin Robert Stolar |
| Citations | 401 U.S. 23 (more) 91 S. Ct. 713; 27 L. Ed. 2d 657; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 82; 57 Ohio Op. 2d 26 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Cert. to the Supreme Court of Ohio |
| Holding | |
| The First Amendment prohibits Ohio from requiring bar applicants to list every organization he or she belonged to since age 17. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Plurality | Black, joined by Douglas, Brennan, Marshall |
| Concurrence | Stewart |
| Dissent | Harlan |
| Dissent | White |
| Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Burger, Harlan, White |
In re Stolar, 401 U.S. 23 (1971), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that requiring bar applicants, like Martin Stolar, to list every organization that one belonged to since age 17 is unconstitutional.[1]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]External links
[edit]
Works related to In re Stolar at Wikisource- Text of In re Stolar, 401 U.S. 23 (1971) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |