Jump to content

Hericium clathroides

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hericium clathroides
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Russulales
Family: Hericiaceae
Genus: Hericium
Species:
H. clathroides
Binomial name
Hericium clathroides
Synonyms
  • Dryodon clathroides (Pall.) P. Karst. 1882
  • Hydnum clathroides Pall. 1773
  • Hydnum coralloides var. clathroides (Pall.) Pers. 1801
  • Merisma clathroides (Pall.) Spreng. 1827
Hericium clathroides
View the Mycomorphbox template that generates the following list
Teeth on hymenium
No distinct cap
Hymenium attachment is not applicable
Lacks a stipe
Spore print is white
Ecology is saprotrophic
Edibility is edible

Hericium clathroides is a species of an edible fungus in the Hericiaceae family.[1]

Characteristics

[edit]

This species was distinguished by some authors from H. coralloides based on its substrate - beech wood (rarely other hardwoods). Another feature used to distinguish the two species is that H. coralloides grows hymenophore spines in tufts. Young fruitbodies are edible.[2]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The species was described under the name Hydnum clathroides by Peter Simon Pallas in the second volume of Reise durch verschiedene Provinzen des rußischen Reichs, published in 1773.[3] It was moved to Hericium genus by Christiaan Hendrik Persoon in 1797.[4] The approval work for this taxon is the first volume of Systema Mycologicum by Elias Magnus Fries published in 1821. There it was classified in Merisma within Hydnum genus.[5]

In 1959 Rudolf Arnold Maas Geesteranus proved the misapplication and approval of the epithet by Elias Fries and proposed a change in the treatment of the taxon H. clathroides. Until now, specimens found on fir (Abies) were traditionally called this, but Maas Geesteranus assigned this name to the species fruiting on beech (Fagus). For the species developing in the fir tree, he proposed Scopoli's approach to classify it as H. coralloides.[6] Some mycologists, like Stanisław Domański [pl], André Marchand [fr] and Theodore Louis Jahn accepted new definitions. Nils Hallenberg [sv] in his 1983 analysis of European Hericium (and his interbreeding experiments of beech and fir species) doubted the separation of two species and proposed H. coralloides neotype.[7] Some authors, like Władysław Wojewoda, followed his approach.[8] Index Fungorum considers this taxon verified.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b P.M. Kirk. "Index Fungorum". Retrieved 2023-03-28.
  2. ^ a b Barbara Gumińska, Władysław Wojewoda, Grzyby i ich oznaczanie: Warszawa, PWRiL, 1985, ISBN 83-09-00714-0
  3. ^ a b P.S. von Pallas (1773). Reise durch verschiedene Provinzen des rußischen Reichs. p. 774.
  4. ^ a b C.H. Persoon, Commentatio de Fungis Clavaeformibus, 1797, p. 23
  5. ^ a b E. Fries. "Systema mycologicum, tom I, s.409". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.
  6. ^ a b R.A. Maas Gesteranus (1959). "The stipitate Hydnums of the Netherlands – IV". Persoonia. 1: 119–130. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.
  7. ^ a b N. Hallenberg (1983). "Hericium coralloides and H. alpestre (Basidiomycetes) in Europe". Mycotaxon. 18: 181–189. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.
  8. ^ a b Władysław Wojewoda, Checklist of Polish Larger Basidiomycetes. Krytyczna lista wielkoowocnikowych grzybów podstawkowych Polski, Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2003, ISBN 83-89648-09-1
  9. ^ P.M. Kirk. "Species synonymy". Species Fungorum. Retrieved 2023-03-28.